Started By
Message

Henry Ruggs sentenced to 3 to 10 years in Prison

Posted on 8/9/23 at 11:58 am
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
42238 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 11:58 am
Former NFL star Henry Ruggs has been sentenced to 3-to-10 years in prison over the 2021 car crash that resulted in the death of 23-year-old Tina Tintor and her dog.

TMZ Sports
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 12:06 pm
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14722 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 11:59 am to
So was he sentenced or just plead guilty with an agreed upon sentencing range?
Posted by Grad92
Member since Feb 2023
1027 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:04 pm to
bro shouldve gotten 10 for the golden retriever alone
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45104 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:05 pm to
Not near enough prison time.
A case can be made that he should have life with no option for parole.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30052 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:06 pm to
He'll do at least 6
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94962 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:09 pm to
Should have been 30 years minimum.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
20938 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

case can be made that he should have life with no option for parole.


No, not without intent
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69602 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

No, not without intent


Driving 150 mph on a residential road is intent.
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
42238 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

A case can be made that he should have life with no option for parole.

What he did was horrible and indefensible, no doubt, but the applicable statute and sentencing guidelines would never allow life without parole for DUI resulting in death.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 12:14 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145110 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:14 pm to
No its not
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
42238 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:15 pm to
I hope Henry Ruggs does something positive with his life after all of this. He will never be able to make up for what he did, but I hope he finds a way to do some good in the future.
Posted by lsudirtbag
Prairieville
Member since Oct 2021
190 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:20 pm to
Normal people never would get this deal.

Plus football coaches writing letters on his behalf.

Posted by SnoopALoop
Nashville
Member since Apr 2014
4394 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:24 pm to
Wtf
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
57452 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:27 pm to
People actually thought he was going to get 30+ years
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110717 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

What he did was horrible and indefensible, no doubt, but the applicable statute and sentencing guidelines would never allow life without parole for DUI resulting in death.

Certainly not by law, but I do believe a logical case can rather easily be made.

I don't agree with the guy saying going 150mph means there was intent but...Going 156mph while drunk is enough to reasonably assume that something really bad could happen and you're endangering the lives of others. He made the decision to do both together knowing or should know that reasonable assumption.

So when something bad did happen, I'm not saying everyone has to agree, but I think there is a clear logical argument to be made that this person does not deserve to ever walk free again considering he killed someone with the decisions he made.

I'd apply similar logic to if you knowingly run a red light just because you didn't want to sit and wait 2 minutes and you cause an accident.

If your intent is to be reckless, you should pay severe consequences when your recklessness causes someone to die. I would argue 3-10 years isn't severe enough. I get the response of losing a decade of his life, losing millions, all fair points. The simple counter is a person died due to his intentional recklessness, that trumps money and a few years IMO
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 12:29 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422059 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Normal people never would get this deal.
.

I did a vehicular homicide plea/sentencing for 5 years a few years ago, with the judge who is the harshest on DWIs, at that.

*ETA: and he was a baw, certainly not a pro athlete
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 12:31 pm
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
65855 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:30 pm to
That's it?
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
6401 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:32 pm to
NOt near enough. What he did was horrific.
Posted by BlacknGold
He Hate Me
Member since Mar 2009
12042 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

I think there is a clear logical argument to be made that this person does not deserve to ever walk free again considering he killed someone with the decisions he made.


"intent" is getting muddied here. His intent was to drive drunk. the consequence was killing someone.

but he did not get behind the wheel with a clear mind thinking "i want to kill someone." by law, it was an accident.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64511 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Normal people never would get this deal.


normal people get deals like this for murder all over the country
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram