- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GM Jocketty to overrule Baker: Aroldis Chapman to be in the rotation (Reds)
Posted on 3/13/13 at 1:37 pm to PurpleAndGold86
Posted on 3/13/13 at 1:37 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
Wrong.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 1:48 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
Strasburg never pitched more than 123 innings in a season before last year.
Wrong.
Ok, enlighten me.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 1:52 pm to barry
quote:25 mph difference on fb/changeup?
He can get it down in the high 70's
33 starts....33 no hitters
CALLING IT NOW
Posted on 3/13/13 at 2:00 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
When did the Big Unit ever throw a curveball?
When Chapman is 6'10" and has a completely unique delivery, he can not learn a curveball. Everyone else has to. Or should, if they want to have a long career once they lose some velocity off of their fastball. He doesn't need Nolan Ryan's curveball, but a decent one would be nice.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 2:12 pm to Gtothemoney
quote:Visionary!!!
If it ain't broke..... Leave it alone
Posted on 3/13/13 at 2:43 pm to Baloo
quote:
if Chapman was on any other team, he'd already be in the rotation. The only reason there's been a three year delay of him being in the pen is because no one in their right mind trusts Dusty Baker with Chapman's arm
Another major reason is Madson throwing his arm out before the season started. Madson was to be the closer, if he was healthy Chapman would have been in the rotation last season.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 2:52 pm to shel311
quote:
quote: If it ain't broke..... Leave it alone Visionary!!!
Lol.. My first advice is free of charge.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 3:17 pm to barry
quote:
Ok, enlighten me.
In 2008 Strasburg threw 97.1 innings for San Diego State. He then turned around and threw another 41 innings over the summer for Team USA. In my book that is almost 140 innings. That is about the same time frame as an MLB season. So that was incorrect.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 4:12 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
He then turned around and threw another 41 innings over the summer for Team USA. In my book that is almost 140 innings. That is about the same time frame as an MLB season. So that was incorrect.
Not the same things when you take off almost 2 months from the the end of a college season, then pitch maybe every 2 weeks. They don't tack on work loads of guys that pitch in winder or fall ball.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 4:19 pm to barry
quote:
Not the same things when you take off almost 2 months from the the end of a college season, then pitch maybe every 2 weeks. They don't tack on work loads of guys that pitch in winder or fall ball.
Don't forget that the college innings came once a week against severely over matched competition, while the MLB innings came every 5 days against significantly tougher to face hitters.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 4:28 pm to barry
quote:
when you take off almost 2 months
He didn't take off anywhere near 2 months.
quote:
They don't tack on work loads of guys that pitch in winder or fall ball.
That also isn't in the same time frame as a major league season. The fact is that he played in college through May and then was on Team USA through the same summer. The stress on his arm was the same. If you want to discount the innings that he threw for team USA backing up to his college season because he was wearing a different jersey then that just doesn't make any sense.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 4:29 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
against significantly tougher to face hitters
And what exactly does this have to do with what we are talking about? Innings are still innings. He was still throwing 98-99 MPH and throwing his breaking pitches.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 4:35 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
And what exactly does this have to do with what we are talking about? Innings are still innings. He was still throwing 98-99 MPH and throwing his breaking pitches.
To an extent. But facing the 6,7, and 8 hole guys from Cal St Northridge doesn't require the same effort as facing the 6,7, and 8 hole guys from the Braves. He could coast a lot more at SDSU than in the minors, and especially in the majors.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 4:39 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
But facing the 6,7, and 8 hole guys from Cal St Northridge doesn't require the same effort as facing the 6,7, and 8 hole guys from the Braves.
It may not require the same mental focus and stress but you aren't putting forth more effort with your arm to throw a 99 MPH fastball against a college hitter than it does to face the Atlanta Braves and that is what we are discussing-stress on the arm itself.
I never said anywhere that Chapman couldn't or shouldn't be a starter. I simply said it is a different workload and then corrected the guy who said that Strasburg has never thrown more than 123 innings until last season.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 4:42 pm to PurpleAndGold86
I'm gonna guess he threw a lot less pitches to college guys than a normal pro would in the same innings, but too lazy to look it up 
Posted on 3/13/13 at 4:42 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
I never said anywhere that Chapman couldn't or shouldn't be a starter. I simply said it is a different workload
Yeah, we agreed on that.
But I will continue to disagree with you about equivalence of the innings. Throwing once a week in college =/= the same work load as every five days in the minors/majors. Even if the innings number is similar.
Posted on 3/13/13 at 5:53 pm to ProjectP2294
I didn't read all four pages or whatever, but Chapman needs to stay in the bullpen.
He was (arguably) the best closer in the game. And with the Reds rotation already as solid as it is, why throw that off? With Chapman/Broxton in the back of the bullpen, the Reds will blow very, very few leads.
Also, IMO, you could make a strong argument that Latos > Cueto last season. Regardless, Cueto, Latos, Bailey, Arroyo is a solid rotation already. Bailey is finally becoming the superstar everyone thought he would be. Leake I'm ehh on, but he's a fifth starter, NBD. And he can hit
Long story short, keep Chappy as a closer
He was (arguably) the best closer in the game. And with the Reds rotation already as solid as it is, why throw that off? With Chapman/Broxton in the back of the bullpen, the Reds will blow very, very few leads.
Also, IMO, you could make a strong argument that Latos > Cueto last season. Regardless, Cueto, Latos, Bailey, Arroyo is a solid rotation already. Bailey is finally becoming the superstar everyone thought he would be. Leake I'm ehh on, but he's a fifth starter, NBD. And he can hit
Long story short, keep Chappy as a closer
Posted on 3/13/13 at 6:56 pm to LSU Red24
If the Reds had a top 5 closer with Chapman in the rotation, I'd understand it a bit more. I don't agree with this decision at all. Chapman, as a starter, will have to dial down his greatest strength....his velocity. Why?
Posted on 3/13/13 at 7:02 pm to Bho
Because 200 innings >>>>>>>>> 70 innings.
Even if it is at a decrease in statistical production.
How do you not understand this?
Even if it is at a decrease in statistical production.
How do you not understand this?
Posted on 3/13/13 at 7:41 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:
How do you not understand this?
Because getting 50 saves (50 wins for team)>20 wins for a team.
ETA: This is all assuming Chapman is an elite starter. If he's not, then it will NOT be worth it.
This post was edited on 3/13/13 at 7:42 pm
Popular
Back to top



0







