- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Florida State planning to leave ACC.. and challenge withdrawal penalty in court
Posted on 12/23/23 at 12:49 pm to SeeeeK
Posted on 12/23/23 at 12:49 pm to SeeeeK
Pete Thamel on ESPN: "Those in the SEC office wouldn't be eager to add Florida State, but the wouldn't be eager to allow the Big Ten to plant a flag in Tallahassee either."
1
Posted on 12/23/23 at 1:23 pm to OleVaught14
Which is why the SEC should add FSU. B10 can settle for Miami.
Same reason Sankey had no choice when OU and Texas came calling because the latter would've definitely joined the B10 otherwise.
Same reason Sankey had no choice when OU and Texas came calling because the latter would've definitely joined the B10 otherwise.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 1:33 pm to GoGators1995
Because the B1G media deal and Research money absolutey DWARFS the SEC. These schools are NOT taking LESS money to go to the SEC. It’s that simple!! It’s financially irresponsible for these schools to go to the SEC…that’s how much money the B1G and media exposure has moving forward. SEC anchored themselves to ESPN…enough said.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 1:55 pm to Buckeye Backer
It's very easy for the SEC.
Assuming you start and circle back on ND at the end,
you take FSU, UNC, and Virginia.
This leaves Miami at an outpost, which the B1G has no more use for. And Clemson as abandoned, which the B1G doesnt want either.
You play offensive and defensive in one move. Don't overthink this.
Assuming you start and circle back on ND at the end,
you take FSU, UNC, and Virginia.
This leaves Miami at an outpost, which the B1G has no more use for. And Clemson as abandoned, which the B1G doesnt want either.
You play offensive and defensive in one move. Don't overthink this.
This post was edited on 12/23/23 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 12/23/23 at 2:01 pm to Buckeye Backer
quote:
Buckeye Backer
Posted on 12/23/23 at 2:06 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
Clemson, outside of the last few years, was never anything more than a regional brand.
They're arguably the strongest CFB in the ACC and yes,brands are important when it comes to TV sets watching.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 2:11 pm to RD Dawg
Lulz no they are not.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 2:12 pm to The Scofflaw
What does Virginia offer the SEC or the B1G?
They have no tradition in football nor basketball…and in terms of branding/marketability…they are pretty ‘meh’. It’s a solid academic school and that’s about it.
They have no tradition in football nor basketball…and in terms of branding/marketability…they are pretty ‘meh’. It’s a solid academic school and that’s about it.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 2:30 pm to Boodis Man
Apparently there are documents related to the ESPN contact tgat can only be viewed in NC. No pictures or copies are allowed. The ACC filed a lawsuit vs FSU to keep the contents secret. Rumor is there is no dollar amount set past 2027. TL;DR FSU is only on the hook for 3 more years. They gone.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 3:27 pm to AUCE05
While true...thats only if they can win in a likely NC courtroom.
Better hope you font get a Duke or WF judge in the bench.
Going to be real interesting if they win in court though.
Better hope you font get a Duke or WF judge in the bench.
Going to be real interesting if they win in court though.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 5:01 pm to Boodis Man
quote:
What does Virginia offer the SEC or the B1G? They have no tradition in football nor basketball…
Ralph Sampson? And a more recent national title?
Posted on 12/23/23 at 6:44 pm to AUCE05
quote:
Lulz no they are not.
Lulz they are
Alabama has played in some of the most watched regular season games despite not being in a top 25 market.The same with Ohio State without being in a top 15 market.
The SEC took on Missouri because of the
KC and St Louis TV markets and guess what? Both markets essentially don't GAS about CFB.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 6:48 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
The SEC took on Missouri because of the KC and St Louis TV markets and guess what? Both markets essentially don't GAS about CFB.
This
Rutgers and Maryland were a wasted add to the B1G
Posted on 12/23/23 at 7:44 pm to Cosmo
quote:
This
lol, it gave them 2 top 30ish markets for tv sets, and more cable networks to sell 2.
this board has some of the dumbest fricks on here, they make the rant look intelligent.
quote:
Eleven of the SEC's 14 teams finished the season among the top 32 most-viewed teams, according to numbers Nielsen ratings released by Action Network on Tuesday.
No. 4 Alabama (12-1, 8-0 in SEC play) was the most-viewed team in college football, with No. 6 Georgia (12-1, 8-0) at No. 4 among teams with at least five Nielsen-rated games.
Incoming SEC teams Texas and Oklahoma were Nos. 8 and 26, respectively, further bolstering the conference's foothold in the college football world. The top five, in order, features Alabama, Ohio State, Colorado, Georgia and Michigan.
The other SEC teams in the top 32 are Tennessee (No. 6), LSU (No. 12), Auburn (No. 15), Missouri (No. 16), Florida (No. 17), Ole Miss (No. 18), Texas A&M (No. 20), Kentucky (No. 31) and Mississippi State (No. 32). All of the teams in the top 32 pulled in over 2 million viewers per game.
top 6 in SEC in viewers per game, 16 out of all cfb teams
Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp fricking tards.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 7:47 pm to Cosmo
quote:
The SEC took on Missouri because of the KC and St Louis TV markets and guess what? Both markets essentially don't GAS about CFB.
This
Rutgers and Maryland were a wasted add to the B1G
Missouri pulls good Nielsen ratings. Maryland and Rutgers do not. Missouri was 16th nationally this season despite getting kind of shitty tv slots - ahead of Florida, Ole Miss, A&M, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Mississippi State, South Carolina, Arkansas, and Vanderbilt.
Maryland averages half of the viewers Mizzou does and Rutgers about one third the viewers.
I swear y’all just make shite up to dig on Mizzou.
This post was edited on 12/23/23 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 12/23/23 at 7:59 pm to SeeeeK
quote:
lol, it gave them 2 top 30ish markets for tv sets, and more cable networks to sell 2.
this board has some of the dumbest fricks on here, they make the rant look intelligent.
LMAO!
This discussion involves TV markets vs brands and if SEC TV viewership proves anything,brands are just as important if not more so.
quote:
it gave them 2 top 30ish markets for tv sets, and more cable networks to sell 2
Combined bigger markets than Birmingham,Knoxville,Baton Rouge,New Orleans, Greenville,Lexington/Louisville and Nashville and keep in mind the only SEC and P5 team in the state barely moved the needle for CFB viewership.
Posted on 12/23/23 at 8:34 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
RD Dawg
Window licker
Posted on 12/23/23 at 8:56 pm to Cosmo
Eh I think the bigger problem with KC is there’s a shite ton of KU/KState people there
Posted on 12/23/23 at 10:26 pm to SeeeeK
quote:
Window licker
Typical.
Anytime you wanna deal with reality and facts let know.
Sorry St Louis and KC are pro sports towns and absolutely kill it when it comes to NFL and MLB ratings but not so much in regards to CFB.
Are you really trying to tell me Missouri brings more viewers across the country than a FSU or a Clemson?
And I'm a window licker?
Posted on 12/24/23 at 5:42 pm to XenScott
quote:
VT has the largest alumni base in the DC and beltway than any other school. I was surprised by this.
quote:
VT has the largest alumni base in the DC and beltway than any other school. I was surprised by this.
And their fans are so annoying. Acting like they have the history of a Blue Blood, when they are below Ole Miss.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News