- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
BreakawayZou83
| Favorite team: | Missouri |
| Location: | Kansas City, Missouri |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 10252 |
| Registered on: | 10/21/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Adam Silver floating the idea of abolishing the NBA Draft to end tanking...
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 2/16/26 at 1:22 pm to Fun Bunch
1. Eliminate the NBA Draft in its entirety. Rookies are free agents.
2. Create a new and improved "loyalty bonus". Each team may grant 33% salary bonuses to up to five players that are not counted against the cap. Players must have played at least one season with the team to be eligible. This would help small markets teams keep their star players and their core players together.
3. Reduce the regular season to 58 games to have a clean double round-robin format to increase the value of each regular season game, reduce injuries, and drive higher viewership.
4. Eliminate divisions and conferences.
2. Create a new and improved "loyalty bonus". Each team may grant 33% salary bonuses to up to five players that are not counted against the cap. Players must have played at least one season with the team to be eligible. This would help small markets teams keep their star players and their core players together.
3. Reduce the regular season to 58 games to have a clean double round-robin format to increase the value of each regular season game, reduce injuries, and drive higher viewership.
4. Eliminate divisions and conferences.
re: Lindsey Nelson Stadium Renovations Almost Complete
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 2/12/26 at 12:35 pm to Rocky Top 14
"What an enormous, state of the art college baseball stadium!"
-Only the Mizzou fans on this board
(It actually looks really nice)
-Only the Mizzou fans on this board
(It actually looks really nice)
re: 2025 SEC Attendance Percentage - Football
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 2/10/26 at 4:01 pm to gamecockman12
quote:
This is literally the stadium at kickoff vs SC State last year at 9:21 ET that occurred after a 2 hour delay. We do a pretty damn good job of filling the stadium.
SCAR has the best fans in football.
re: 2025 SEC Attendance Percentage - Football
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 2/10/26 at 7:08 am to REBEL5 AC
Mizzou was sold out for the whole season. Our capacity was reduced for construction this season and it looks like that was not factored into these lazy stats.
re: Polling confirms Missouri not a fit for SEC
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 2/9/26 at 5:48 pm to Sophrosyne
quote:
Man, Sikeston is the deep south.
Anyone here who argues that southeastern Missouri isn’t southern has clearly never visited that part of the state. On the other hand, anyone arguing that KC or St. Louis are southern has never spent time in the South.
re: Mizzou QB wins Super Bowl!
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 2/9/26 at 1:32 pm to QBUMizzou
Doesn't matter; had Super Bowl.
re: SEC Revenue Distribution announced ...
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 2/6/26 at 11:04 am to scrooster
quote:
Donors are where it's at ... but the SEC has plenty of big money donors.
Exactly. If it was a simple matter of schools with the wealthiest alumni translating to the best football programs, then the blue bloods would be Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, Penn, MIT, etc.
re: Time Magazine Top 500 Universities in the World - just released
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 2/4/26 at 9:04 am to TX Tea
quote:
3. Mizzou 124

re: My early 2026 prediction for Missouri football record. Post your team's record for 2026.
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 2/2/26 at 4:46 pm to TrueLefty
It’s looking like it’ll be a tough year. Guessing 7-5, buoyed by a weak non-conference schedule. I think we will beat Arkansas and Kentucky and scrape by with one other win. We’re losing a lot on defense. Should be fun watching Hardy and our QB situation can’t be worse than last season. Still, we look to have one of the weaker SEC rosters heading into the Spring.
re: What benefits did SEC get by going to 9 conference games?
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/29/26 at 9:45 am to dstone12
quote:
1. If you go to 9 conf games, did SEC gain additional dollar commitment from ESPN?
Yes. It'll equate to about $5 million more per SEC school. Seems like it should be significantly more though. This is where the SEC/Sankey dropped the ball.
quote:
2. Can you at least get the committees to agree that a larger percent of the SEC is ranked, making a tougher SOS for consideration in playoffs?
This already happens but the SEC has shite the bed in the Playoffs for the past couple years.
quote:
3. More competition means more injuries and wear/tear. Can this explain lack of finals appearances? ***or has the big 10 caught up?
I think NIL and the Portal have a lot more to do with it. Especially since the SEC hasn't even played a nine-game conference schedule yet.
quote:
4. Did Sankey move to 9 games just to get the national media off his back?
Or... a nine-game conference schedule made more sense from a scheduling perspective, added revenue, and ensured SEC teams play each other more frequently. Half the whining on this Board is about how "x school has only y school twice since 2012". This new format fixes that problem.
re: I went to Austin this past holiday season
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/28/26 at 10:12 am to fareplay
Austin is the most overrated city in America. It's hot. It's full of aggressive homeless people. Sixth Street is downright nasty. Traffic is atrocious. It's somehow still insanely expensive. The University of Texas feels like it is 90% international students, so the campus feels more like a Model U.N. convention than a big state school.
Sure, Lake Travis is nice. But that's a 40 minute drive from campus to the nearest edge of the Lake.
Sure, Lake Travis is nice. But that's a 40 minute drive from campus to the nearest edge of the Lake.
re: The NIL and SEC decline argument
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/20/26 at 1:18 pm to topcat88
1. The Blue Bloods became the best programs because they had success in the early modern era of football (post WWII). Almost all of them rose to prominence by the 1960s at the latest. Their success became a formula for a self-sustaining cycle.
2. Because they won the most, Blue Bloods generated the most attention and therefore the most revenue - they could sell more tickets, build bigger stadiums, hire better coaches, and attract more tv dollars (which were relatively small back then).
3. Blue Bloods typically invested in facilities and coaches decades ahead of their peers. Programs like Nebraska were ahead of their time with their state-of-the-art training facilities. This made it easier to attract higher caliber players in an era where players weren't paid (wink wink).
4. Blue Blood programs (aside from Nebraska and Notre Dame) are almost all located in high school talent hotbeds. Before NIL and the Portal, kids tended to stay closer to home. This has radically changed almost overnight.
5. Prior to the Portal and NIL, a top recruit's logical track was to commit to the best program and work his way up the depth chart over the years. So the Alabamas and Ohio States of the world often had better second or third-string players than the starters at smaller P5 programs. Now, those 5* sophomores who couldn't crack the rotation has financial and scouting incentives to transfer to a smaller program, start earlier in their career, and potentially get paid millions of dollars. This more than anything else has leveled the playing field. I used to watch Mizzou hang with the Nebraskas or Oklahomas of the world for the first half, then slowly collapse because they simply couldn't compete with the depth of their opponents.
But let's be real - top programs probably made more shady dealings in the pre-NIL era than the likes of Indiana football who probably couldn't generate enough interest in the program to justify such a risk.
2. Because they won the most, Blue Bloods generated the most attention and therefore the most revenue - they could sell more tickets, build bigger stadiums, hire better coaches, and attract more tv dollars (which were relatively small back then).
3. Blue Bloods typically invested in facilities and coaches decades ahead of their peers. Programs like Nebraska were ahead of their time with their state-of-the-art training facilities. This made it easier to attract higher caliber players in an era where players weren't paid (wink wink).
4. Blue Blood programs (aside from Nebraska and Notre Dame) are almost all located in high school talent hotbeds. Before NIL and the Portal, kids tended to stay closer to home. This has radically changed almost overnight.
5. Prior to the Portal and NIL, a top recruit's logical track was to commit to the best program and work his way up the depth chart over the years. So the Alabamas and Ohio States of the world often had better second or third-string players than the starters at smaller P5 programs. Now, those 5* sophomores who couldn't crack the rotation has financial and scouting incentives to transfer to a smaller program, start earlier in their career, and potentially get paid millions of dollars. This more than anything else has leveled the playing field. I used to watch Mizzou hang with the Nebraskas or Oklahomas of the world for the first half, then slowly collapse because they simply couldn't compete with the depth of their opponents.
But let's be real - top programs probably made more shady dealings in the pre-NIL era than the likes of Indiana football who probably couldn't generate enough interest in the program to justify such a risk.
re: Arkansas fans are trashy.
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/16/26 at 9:07 am to WildcatMike
Any SEC fanbase (except Vandy) calling another SEC fanbase trashy:


re: Latest On3 Portal Rankings
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/16/26 at 9:05 am to reds on reds on reds
I've quit giving a damn about recruiting or transfer rankings after watching Indiana this season. They are ranked 72nd in Team Talent Composite - beneath Boston College, Tulane, and even UTSA.
I don't think the evaluations are worth much for transfers. These scouting services excelled at evaluating high school talent with an assumption that those kids would go to a school and continue to develop. Now it's madness and I don't think they have any clue how to evaluate whether a former 3* recruit with five years of experience can become a top talent at different program. I'm not sure it's even possible.
I don't think the evaluations are worth much for transfers. These scouting services excelled at evaluating high school talent with an assumption that those kids would go to a school and continue to develop. Now it's madness and I don't think they have any clue how to evaluate whether a former 3* recruit with five years of experience can become a top talent at different program. I'm not sure it's even possible.
re: This is the worst the SECRant has ever been
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/15/26 at 10:03 am to VolSack
quote:
drive most SEC fans away and become an LSU circle jerk board
So it returns to its origins.
re: Tired of hearing NIL killed the college game.
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/14/26 at 10:02 am to BigSneezy
NIL won't kill the college game. But the existing infrastructure (toothless NCAA) was not ready for its impact. We're in the Wild West years of NIL still, but it won't last. For starters, colleges (and more importantly, their boosters) are already getting fed up with paying kids millions of dollars to come play football for a year and then transfer elsewhere if there is an extra dollar to be found. Let me be clear: I don't fault these kids. This is life changing money and we'd all likely do the same in their shoes. It's a failure to implement reasonable rules and a failure by schools and conferences to protect themselves.
But look at what the B1G did with its template contracts that restrict portal entry and exclusive NIL rights. They are ahead of the SEC on that front. The Washington QB that just tried to transfer is going to get a real fast lesson in American contract law since Washington is under no legal obligation to enter him into the portal and it owns his NIL rights for the duration of the contract. We're going to see more and more of that as the facade of the "student athlete" disappears and we treat big time college athletics like the money making machine that they are and have been for many years. I also imagine that further refining of the Portal will occur: shorter windows, fewer opportunities to enter, etc.
But for now, it's a clusterfrick.
But look at what the B1G did with its template contracts that restrict portal entry and exclusive NIL rights. They are ahead of the SEC on that front. The Washington QB that just tried to transfer is going to get a real fast lesson in American contract law since Washington is under no legal obligation to enter him into the portal and it owns his NIL rights for the duration of the contract. We're going to see more and more of that as the facade of the "student athlete" disappears and we treat big time college athletics like the money making machine that they are and have been for many years. I also imagine that further refining of the Portal will occur: shorter windows, fewer opportunities to enter, etc.
But for now, it's a clusterfrick.
re: frick The SEC, Peace Bitches
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/14/26 at 9:05 am to Lt. Columbo

re: I haven’t seen Serraneaux post baseball rankings. Did I miss it?
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/13/26 at 3:26 pm to Jack Daniel
Idk but pencil in Mizzou for #16.
re: ACC trying to poach UF & USCe?
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/13/26 at 9:45 am to Yaboylsu63
You should do it, Florida. Look how well it worked out for Georgia Tech!
re: SEC Roll Call - Season Finale
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/12/26 at 4:00 pm to Bryno1960
quote:
So much better than SEC Shorts. I love all the t-shirts Matt Mitchell wears for the different teams. Roll Trees and Cook'n up a Whoop'n are my two favorites.
I love this one:

re: The Dream Team was garbage
Posted by BreakawayZou83 on 1/9/26 at 9:38 am to MF Doom
quote:
Why are basketball fans so whiney about the different generations of their sport
Basketball has evolved a lot faster than baseball or football, and it has seen incredibly significant rule changes. It's really only had a few generations of professionals come and go. And the old heads are weirdly defensive and make ridiculous arguments about how the league is "soft" these days and "MJ would dominate these kids". But they ignore the fact that MJ got to play and dominate in an era where not only was the average player far, far, far worse than today, but by his own admission, he would not be able to do today what he was able to do in the NBA during his time when the illegal defense rule existed. To oversimplify: that rule forced defenses to either play 1v1 or fully commit to a double-team. Zone defenses were illegal. Further, you couldn't double off the ball, or commit to a double from the weak side.
Watch how the Warriors defend LeBron here:
In Jordan's era, both Curry (30) and Lee (10) would have been called for illegal defense. Curry is not within the required distance to his offensive player and Lee cannot stand in the lane as he is not closely guarding his man. LeBron scores here anyway, but in MJ's era, LeBron either gets a clean 1v1 against Iggy, or Lee has to fully double-team LeBron, leaving his man wide open for a dunk/alley-oop.
Here's another example of the Warriors all collapsing to guard Durant:
In MJ's era, this would've been an immediate whistle - and you could pick from three of the five Warriors defenders who are illegally cheating off their coverage to collapse on Durant if necessary.
By contrast, here is how a defense was forced to legally guard MJ during his era, compared to how LeBron was guarded in his era post the illegal defense rule:
LeBron in MJ's era would have run down the court, forced a switch (or gotten a free drive through an empty lane if the team didn't switch), and dominate the worst defender on every possession with no threat of help defense unless it was a full double (which would leave a teammate wide open for a LeBron pass). In his own era, LeBron has three guys waiting to collapse on him if he beats Kawhi one-on-one. But since the Spurs can float in the zone, switch, and recover, he can't simply throw a pass until he forces them to commit and recover defensively. Only then can LeBron try to find a gap in the defense.
You can all act like this isn't a big deal, but it would be the equivalent of outlawing zone coverages on defense in football and forcing defenders to stay within a certain distance of their own man, or hard commit to double teams on every play. Guys like Megatron would have average 200 yards receiving per game.
Popular
3












