Started By
Message

re: Did Michael Jordan insult Cowherd's momma?

Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178883 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:30 pm to
Lebron tries to fight the women in the stands
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

You have clearly showed that you build your narratives and thoughts, and work the facts into them.

Not at all. From the beginning to now, I have made the case that Jordan had a will and competitiveness that distinguishes him from Lebron at this point. You have bounced around trying to prove that to be an impossible observation. Then, in the end, you acknowledge that things like hustle and effort, though not statistically quantified, are observable.

I have been consistent, you have drummed up debates about Tony Parker, Bill Russell, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone and the 11th and 12th guy on the bench.
This post was edited on 2/18/13 at 12:33 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178883 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:32 pm to
quote:



Right! Because THAT is how you prove yourself to be a MAN!


It's a common fact Charles Barkley was a better man once he got up off the court with a Shaq rumble.


quote:


You know, because taking care of your kids, never getting arrested, and just being a decent human being is NOT enough.


Only a Lebron camper would want to talk about off court when discussing on court.

quote:

All men should be like Shawn Kemp. Get high and go bang broads and never take care of the kids.


Dude, this isn't father of the year competition.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84434 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

It's a common fact Charles Barkley was a better man once he got up off the court with a Shaq rumble.



I disagree. I think Charles was a better man with his controversial "I am not a role model" soundbite.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112854 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Then, in the end, you acknowledge that things like hustle and effort, though not statistically quantified, are observable.

I'm done here.

If we can't read and comprehend, what's the point?
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

If we can't read and comprehend, what's the point?

Give me the benefit of the doubt and just assume that the message wasn't as clearly delivered as you thought. I'm willing to understand if you explain it differently.

Does hustle, effort, will, and inner drive exist? Are all of these things, assuming you agree they exist, equal among all competitors? Assuming no, then is it possible to observe actions that demonstrate hustle, effort, will, and inner drive?
This post was edited on 2/18/13 at 12:37 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178883 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:38 pm to
Are points per game a quantifiable comparable statistic if we can't put a science to the rule changes in the NBA over the past 10 years in what could have been before those changes?
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69079 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Lebron tries to fight the women in the stands


Posted by Ford Frenzy
337 posts
Member since Aug 2010
6901 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

You have never met them. How can you even pretend to have an opinion about this?
probably just the fact that he has ice cold blood flowing through his veins


ETA to add that is indeed a fact
This post was edited on 2/18/13 at 12:50 pm
Posted by jturn17
Member since Jan 2011
4978 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Does hustle, effort, will, and inner drive exist? Are all of these things, assuming you agree they exist, equal among all competitors?


Don't these thing show up in their statistics though? If you don't hustle and show effort, your rebounding numbers will dip. Will and inner drive can pretty easily be seen in how your game and numbers progress during your career.

The only way it's tough to capture is defense because we haven't exactly figured out a way to quantify individual defense in an effective manner. But we'll get their eventually.

I mean that's just my view though. Also, teams themselves chart this kind of stuff in statistical form. So it's definitely quantifiable. The Heat chart effort all the time with charges taken, quality rotations, and hedging. Just because fans don't have access to this information doesn't mean that we can't quantify it. We just haven't.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112854 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

So it's definitely quantifiable. The Heat chart effort all the time with charges taken, quality rotations, and hedging. Just because fans don't have access to this information doesn't mean that we can't quantify it. We just haven't.
SportView!!!
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34327 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Today he said that marketing made Jordan popular


And Lebron wasn't marketed?
Posted by jturn17
Member since Jan 2011
4978 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

SportView!!!


SportVu is going to be crazy. It's going to take a decade just to figure out what info from that is even worth anything. But the Heat don't have that yet. They just manually chart every game.

That's the subtle irony of all these player decisions. The way fans have analyzed the game for the past 20-30 years has been archaic. Teams have analyzed the game in a much more advanced manner, and it's taken fans years to catch up. And we're only now getting there because the internet has made this stuff widely available. Hell, Dean Smith was talking about points per possession and efficiency back in the 70s and 80s. But I digress.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112854 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

SportVu
I heard Haberstroh talking about it on LeBatard's radio show.

I tried to google it, though with the way I spelled it compared to the way you spelled it, it makes sense that I couldn't find any good articles on it

quote:

That's the subtle irony of all these player decisions. The way fans have analyzed the game for the past 20-30 years has been archaic. Teams have analyzed the game in a much more advanced manner, and it's taken fans years to catch up. And we're only now getting there because the internet has made this stuff widely available. Hell, Dean Smith was talking about points per possession and efficiency back in the 70s and 80s. But I digress.


I have my reservations on how popular it can be for fans as a whole, but I can't wait to see more and more info come out from SportVu.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31551 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

MJ was an a-hole but he was teflon due to his popularity.


And yet, Pippen, Kukoc, Rodman, etc never seem to have minded. I'm willing to bet they didn't give a shite if MJ was an a-hole.
Posted by Akit1
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2006
8343 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 2:02 pm to
Bill Simmons called it. Years will go by and MJ's achievements will slowly be scrutinized.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182225 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 2:05 pm to
quote:


It helped tremendously. You really cant argue that.




I like it when people that were like 3 when Jordan was at his peek make comments like this.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Don't these thing show up in their statistics though?
Often, yes.

quote:

If you don't hustle and show effort, your rebounding numbers will dip.
That is part of the equation. Size, strength and position typically play a larger role with regards to rebounds.

quote:

Also, teams themselves chart this kind of stuff in statistical form. So it's definitely quantifiable.
I would agree that evidence of some of these intangibles is partially quantifiable, but not directly.

quote:

The Heat chart effort all the time with charges taken, quality rotations, and hedging.
Again, these aren't the same as the intangibles I have mentioned and don't necessarily chart effort. At least not directly. They chart certain aspects of basketball that people associate with effort. I agree with the association, but only loosely.

I like sabermetrics and the additional quantification that teams are doing, but I suspect we will never be able to directly quantify the types of intangibles I listed above. Who knows though? As it relates to MJ and LBJ, though, we know that the statistics aren't available.
This post was edited on 2/18/13 at 2:15 pm
Posted by RonBurgundy
Whale's Vagina(San Diego)
Member since Oct 2005
13302 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

. Today he said that marketing made Jordan popular


It did, but being popular didn't make him the GOAT. He did that on his own.
Posted by LSUsCRYSTALball
Member since Dec 2012
1709 posts
Posted on 2/18/13 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

MJ won 6 NBA finals and was the MVP all 6 times, that pretty much says all you need to know about him

LeBron will never do anything to compare to that



you do not know this for sure. i agree, at the moment MJ is top dog. but i would not ever say lebron won't win five more rings, no matter what the odds are
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram