Started By
Message

Did BCS/modern era Notre Dame still have higher academic requirements for recruits?

Posted on 12/31/21 at 1:12 am
Posted by BGLAVI2
LOS ANGELES
Member since Jan 2013
237 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 1:12 am
Or was this dropped long ago?

We all know despite media hype they were never on same level as SEC or OSU.
Posted by FreeState
Member since Jun 2012
3175 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 1:16 am to
I seem to recall the last time we played them when Fournet was playing we lost.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59109 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 1:37 am to
quote:

I seem to recall the last time we played them when Fournet was playing we lost.


We lost that game, but we also lost to them in the ‘17 season, Orgeron’s 1st. After the disasters is start that year, we miraculously rebounded and had a chance to finish with 10 wins going into the bowl. O wanted it too bad and coached way too tight with a puckered up a-hole. I think the. OST egregious one was kicking a field goal instead of going for a short 4th down that he normally would have.


To answer OP’s question, I think they lowered requirements for athletes to get in in the last decade or so. Still harder than most places, I believe, but not as hard as it used to be. They do, however, have to remain eligible to play, and I’m not sure they have a bunch of easy major curriculums like most P5 schools.
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
77321 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 3:28 am to
Yes they still have the same higher academic requirements they have always had...
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164143 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 4:16 am to
quote:

I seem to recall the last time we played them when Fournet was playing we lost.

Brian Kelly was 2-0 against LSU at Notre Dame. That time being the first game.
Posted by rjokerlsu
Big Spring, TX
Member since Apr 2007
6890 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 4:29 am to
Yes. Norte Dame still has higher academic requirements.
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 6:25 am to
quote:

Yes they still have the same higher academic requirements they have always had...

Not completely true. Back in Holtz's days, the priests traded some academic integrity for more wins because of the Gerry Faust debacle. They didn't directly lower the standards; they just allow more exceptions. Tony Rice was a Prop 48 player, I believe.

Then the Kim Dunbar affair happened. Dunbar was in her mid twenties, a bookkeeper at a local business, and embezzled over a million dollars. She liked athletic studs and dated one or more football players. She bought gifts, took them on trips to Vegas, etc. This didn't raise an issue because she was their "girlfriend."

At the time ND used to have a luncheon with the coaches on Fridays before home games that anyone could attend by paying $25. Dunbar attended one, and this made her a booster. The NCAA didn't buy the girlfriend excuse especially since no one cared where she got the money to lavish the players.

The NCAA leveled ND with their first and maybe only NCAA recruiting violation. Really just gave them a slap on the wrist, but the Priests were embarrassed. It's really the reason Holtz retired.

Subsequently they reduced the exceptions and here we are.
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
5811 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 6:47 am to
Lou Holtz convinced Fr Beauchamps to lower them in 86 or so. Tony Rice was the first “Prop 48” prospect ever signed at ND. Their students and alumni have them a lot of shite over it until Lou win the NC 2 years later. They went back to the higher standards after Lou retired. ND went on probation right after he retired for all sorts of football related violations that occurred under Lou. As a result, the academic standards were put back into place.
Posted by lsudat10
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2010
2742 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 6:52 am to
I’m not sure why you received a bunch of DV’s, but I see nothing wrong or triggering with what you wrote… unless you’re wrong about the ND requirements, that idk.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3361 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 7:10 am to
quote:

Yes. Norte Dame still has higher academic requirements


Lots of articles on google about this.

The consensus is the academic admission standards are lower for athletes than the student body.

Not to say it’s admission standards are on par with other power 5 schools, but it is lower.

Stanford on the other hand doesn’t lower it’s requirements.

Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64661 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 7:12 am to
Oklahoma State University is perty good but come on.
Posted by SOL2
Dallas burbs
Member since Jan 2020
4776 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 7:13 am to
yes
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260635 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 7:16 am to
If you listen to ND (or even B10) players communicate, then compare to SEC players, you'll find out pretty quickly they have more intelligent players than Southern schools.
Posted by tigahlovah
virginia beach, va
Member since Oct 2009
3292 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 7:24 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/31/21 at 7:27 am
Posted by Carlos the Tiger
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2020
203 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 7:29 am to
The higher academic requirements for entering scholarship athletes at places like Notre Dame, Vanderbilt, Duke etc is a myth. Their entrance requirements are the minimum set by the NCAA or the conference.

The media and these schools like to perpetuate the myth but that is exactly what it is: a myth. I have had relatives play at Duke and Vandy during the past 20 years. So don't bother telling me I am wrong.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27544 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 7:36 am to
Notre Dame degrees are worth more. Rod West at Entergy has always said that having the ND diploma opened doors for him that other diplomas would not necessarily have opened
Posted by Carlos the Tiger
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2020
203 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 7:39 am to
It is undoubtedly true that a degree from one of these schools is "worth more." And once admitted they must still make the grades to stay eligible. But, the admission requirements for scholarship athletes are the minimum required for eligibility.
Posted by TheAstroTiger
Member since Jun 2018
3101 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 10:04 am to
But you are wrong.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422567 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Stanford on the other hand doesn’t lower it’s requirements.



*laughs in Richard Sherman*
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
5811 posts
Posted on 12/31/21 at 10:11 am to
The academic standard for an athlete to enter ND vs LSU is very different. Is it the same standard for both ND students and ND athletes , no, but they will not take the athlete that makes the bare minimum NCAA /SEC requirements and that’s a fact.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram