- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Could Houston or DFW support a second pro sports franchise in the same league?
Posted on 8/16/26 at 1:26 pm to chalmetteowl
Posted on 8/16/26 at 1:26 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
They got a ways to go to be in the class with NYC, LA, and Chicago…
2025 pop 2020 pop
Chicago–Naperville–Elgin, IL-IN MSA 9,434,123 9,449,351 -0.16% -15,228 Chicago–Naperville, IL-IN-WI CSA
Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington, TX MSA 8,477,157 7,637,387 +11.00% +839,770 Dallas–Fort Worth, TX-OK CSA
Dallas has about 20 years before they are "in the class" of Chicago.
They could easily support a shitty franchise like the White Sox
or the angels or the mets for that matter.
Posted on 8/16/26 at 1:33 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
Dallas has about 20 years before they are "in the class" of Chicago.
Already in same class... 5 to 10 years and they are more than just that.
Posted on 8/16/26 at 1:52 pm to Zappas Stache
Not enough Dots and Muslims fans in Frisco and McKinney for that to work :-)
Posted on 8/16/26 at 2:49 pm to Jim Rockford
Two teams in the same market no longer makes financial sense. Move the Mets to Charlotte, White Sox to Nashville, Angels to SLC, Jets to San Antonio and Chargers to San Diego
Posted on 8/16/26 at 3:16 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:I can tell you without a doubt the Cowboys would never allow a rival franchise in San Antonio. Those people are rabid Cowboys fans, and it's a pretty big market. No way they'd ever give that up.
If you were going to do that, you’d probably just make it in San Antonio
Posted on 8/16/26 at 4:10 pm to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
can tell you without a doubt the Cowboys would never allow a rival franchise in San Antonio. Those people are rabid Cowboys fans, and it's a pretty big market. No way they'd ever give that up.
I mean that’s true of any football franchise in Texas regardless of city.
Posted on 8/16/26 at 6:43 pm to Jim Rockford
North DFW could support a 2nd NFL team but Jerry and his family would never allow it.
From where I live it takes an hour (at least) to get to a Cowboy’s game, it’s a pain in the arse.
From where I live it takes an hour (at least) to get to a Cowboy’s game, it’s a pain in the arse.
Posted on 8/16/26 at 9:03 pm to Jim Rockford
Downtown Dallas could handle an MLB team, but more likely Austin/San Antonio would be a better spot
Posted on 8/16/26 at 10:47 pm to TexasTiger08
quote:
Adding a second team to a major market hasn’t been done in a while, has it?
Rams / Chargers
But that was 0 to 2, not 1 to 2
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:50 am to GentleJackJones
quote:
The Texans and Rockets are just kinda there.
The Rockets are definitely not just here and the Texans are starting to become relevant to Houston fans. The Texans have by and large sucked except for a few odd years when JJ was here but this team under Demeco feels different.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 8:52 am to Jim Rockford
DFW probably, Houston nope
Posted on 8/17/26 at 12:17 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
They are not big enough.
DFW is at 8.5M now and will pass Chicago in 5 or so years. However, there shouldn't be a second team in any of the leagues.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 12:20 pm to Brisketeer
quote:
DFW is at 8.5M now and will pass Chicago in 5 or so years. However, there shouldn't be a second team in any of the leagues.
Well yeah, DFW can grow in all directions. Chicago has a natural barrier on one side
Posted on 8/17/26 at 6:42 pm to TexasTiger08
quote:
Places like NY and Chicago have had 2 teams for years, and I think it thrived because they identified with the neighborhood or borough.
The Cubs are on the north side and the Sox on the south side of Chicago so it works there. In NYC, because of the boroughs, it was feasible to have borough-centric franchises (Dodgers in Brooklyn, Yankees in the Bronx, Giants in ?, and now the Mets in Queens).
Not familiar enough with the DFW challenges, but all three stadiums for Houston are inside the I-610 loop. So, I don't see how it would work here. Population's there, but not the natural geographic boundaries.
Posted on 8/17/26 at 7:22 pm to AlwysATgr
Austin/San Antonio is obvious choice but I’d love anything on the north side of Houston.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 1:02 am to Jim Rockford
I actually think Dallas could have enough support for a 2nd NFL team via a weird coalition of transplants who grew up hating the Cowboys but would be willing to switch allegiance to a different Dallas NFL team, natives who just didn’t like the Cowboys as kids but would support a different team to just troll/be different, and disgruntled Cowboys fans who hate Jerry and are sick and tired of him.
Obviously that team would still be FAR behind the Cowboys in popularity (and Jerry / the NFL owners would obviously block any such move/attempt), but I think there could be enough people in that weird hodgepodge of Cowboys haters in Dallas for it to hypothetically survive. (And not having that disdain is why I don’t think a 2nd NFL team could survive in Houston.)
As for the other sports… I’m not going to say it’s impossible, but it’s a different era in how sports are consumed now, and I simply don’t think it’s feasible anymore outside the huge cities of NY and LA. Chicago’s two baseball teams are based on local geographical and AL/NL considerations that were huge deals a century ago but no longer are really as relevant. And Chicago has only one team in the other sports.
Obviously that team would still be FAR behind the Cowboys in popularity (and Jerry / the NFL owners would obviously block any such move/attempt), but I think there could be enough people in that weird hodgepodge of Cowboys haters in Dallas for it to hypothetically survive. (And not having that disdain is why I don’t think a 2nd NFL team could survive in Houston.)
As for the other sports… I’m not going to say it’s impossible, but it’s a different era in how sports are consumed now, and I simply don’t think it’s feasible anymore outside the huge cities of NY and LA. Chicago’s two baseball teams are based on local geographical and AL/NL considerations that were huge deals a century ago but no longer are really as relevant. And Chicago has only one team in the other sports.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 5:06 am to Jim Rockford
Houston, probably not. Astros, Rockets, and Dynamo are all locked and located in the city’s center, and NHL is likely to face problems if they name a franchise anything but the ‘Aeros’. Your lone outside chance at two teams is moving the Oilers back from Tennessee, and I don’t think anyone wants that.
DFW, I think could get a team if they focus on the Dallas and Ft Worth split. But the Cowgirls and Rangers in Arlington stops that. I don’t see the NBA able to make that split with lack of talent, nor NHL able to make it without expanding to 50+ teams. Soccer probably could, but the USL already shoved their DFW team in Dallas.
DFW, I think could get a team if they focus on the Dallas and Ft Worth split. But the Cowgirls and Rangers in Arlington stops that. I don’t see the NBA able to make that split with lack of talent, nor NHL able to make it without expanding to 50+ teams. Soccer probably could, but the USL already shoved their DFW team in Dallas.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 4:42 pm to Jim Rockford
Houston NO
Dallas/Fort Worth YES
Dallas/Fort Worth YES
Posted on 8/18/26 at 4:48 pm to GoldenGuy
quote:
Soccer probably could, but the USL already shoved their DFW team in Dallas.
Ain’t nobody worried about no USL
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:37 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:The New York (baseball) Giants played in the Polo Grounds in the northern part of Manhattan.
Giants in ?
Popular
Back to top


1



