Favorite team:Atlanta Braves 
Location:Knoxville, TN
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:3064
Registered on:12/1/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Forum
Message
quote:


The arrest of Lemon was a ridiculous police action.


Nah

quote:

He’ll never be convicted in a court of law.


Probably 50/50

quote:

He may even eventually recover damages for wrongful arrest…


He was indicted by a grand jury... so highly unlikely
quote:


Would they plan on starting a guy at QB who they are suing?


It's more to prevent him from playing for Miami.
quote:

Also, the DB going down after the interception was like the ONE TIME it actually wasn't good to do so.



Up 6 points is thew perfect time to take a knee.

Taking off the helmet was stupid but didn't cost them.
LSU Fans:

"How do I make this about me?"
quote:


This is like some dude who won the World Series or something giving someone their ring. It does not mean the person who got the ring did a damn thing to win the World Series or Superbowl or whatever the f*ck.


It more like a gold medal swimmer giving their gold medal to someone who saved them from drowning.

They didn't win the medal, but they kinda deserve it.

And she's doing it out of acknowledgement, not selling it.
I was a UT Student during the Lady Vols 3 peat run with 2 HoF players and a HoF legend coach. They routinely got beat by the college guy practice squad that they scrimmaged against. They had joint exhibitions with the men's team, so we got to watch this at Thompson Boiling.
quote:

Why not keep the data herself?

Follow the whistleblower statute requirements?



She should have retained you ahead of time. Two benefits:

1. She would be in better shape legally, since you know everything.

2. We wouldn't have to read you making these same comments on every thread, because you'd be in danger of breaking privilege.
quote:

This would allow for the Vanderbilt and Texas


It would have been A&M and Ole Miss in this game. It wouldn't have helped anything.
I'm tired of this era of politics and life in general when people attempt to lie about stuff when they are on video doing the opposite.

We need to increase the social cost of pulling this move somehow.
quote:

Imagine getting offended over pop lyrics these days


This line is so tired...

No one is offended, they are talking about how cringe it is. Her fans are saying the same thing.
quote:

Because she really looks like the meme picture of him


This... he is making fun at her intentionally choosing to be as ugly as a Meme of him.
quote:

Kimmel was obviously talking about Trump supporters. He was NOT talking about Kirk, and he was NOT talking about the murderer.


This is a dishonest reading of the quote. I don't for one second think you actually believe it. You are just asserting it to win an argument. No honest, reasonable person would assert that he was not talking about the the murder. I'm not going to debate someone who is dishonest.

quote:

hat's not a lie. He's not even saying that the murderer was maga.


Yeah, there's no way a reasonable person would read "MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them" and not think it was a claim that the shooter was MAGA. This is an absurd assertion.

quote:

He's just talking about the overreaction from Trump supporters.


No, He's clearly claiming the shooter is MAGA, and "The MAGA Gang" is trying to characterise him as something else to score political points. That's PLAINLY what he said.
quote:

No, what he actually said matters. I can't find anywhere that he said anything about Kirk in that monologue.


It took me 3 seconds on Google, I posted the quote above and there is video if you just Google "Kimmel statement Kirk"

I don't think you looked very hard.
quote:

Do you have the exact quote?


In his Monday night monologue, Kimmel said: "The MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it."

The Shooter's relationship with a Transitioning person was know on Saturday. The bullet engraving was known before that.

Had Kimmel said "I think the Right is goin overboard in their anger." That's an opinion. What he said was an outright lie in face of already established facts.
quote:

Well, Jimmy getting his show pulled for freedom of speech,'


This is not true.

He's getting is pulled because he just parroted a huge lie that was intentional propaganda to help the left. It wasn't even a joke.
My Menu on YouTubeTV say Celebrity Family Feud, but its showing News Nation instead of ABC when I load?
Two of the 3 teams closest to me geographically didn't exist when I was 8.
quote:

have all those being fired been white females? not that it would surprise me


Mostly.

One older white male.

Why are English teachers so nuts?

Posted by CountryVolFan on 9/12/25 at 12:29 pm
The Libs of TikTok account keeps coming across my Twitter feed. She keeps posting people that have said unhinged things about Kirk. it seems like 50% of those are in education somewhere and the majority of those teach English. I wonder if there is an explanation for this trend?
I was just going to post the same thing on Twitter...

plus it has some random message in yellow that makes you think there is a penalty.
quote:

That was literally not stated nor implied by his post

If this is a tight-knit conspiracy, how do they not already know the crucial witnesses to murder?


Why do you think indictments are sealed in the first place?

1. So the rich accused don't leave the country.

2. Protecting witnesses. If they are using a CI or cooperation agreement they will protect that witness until exposure is required at trial. Lots of negotiation happening before then.

3. Allowing for multiple defendants to be arrested simultaneously. Again, so some don't leave the county.
They had time for "Extensive discussion" on all of them, but he couldn't be bothered to sign his name?

quote:

If the Sniper didnt miss wide Left


We'd be a year into a brutal Civil Conflict
quote:

You're right. I forgot MAGA was all about the "Living Constitution" these days.


One thing is fore sure.. you win every argument with a strawman on here that I've seen.
quote:

Will likely take more as a Constitutional amendment should be necessary


Why do you keep saying this in every thread. This is an ignorant legal argument. There is 100% a pathway to do this without an amendment.

One a semi-resonable argument can be made, it’s a political issue decided by SCOTUS. He needs 5 Black Robes not an amendment.
quote:

Then to add insult to injury they lose the Cup to not only an American hockey team but one from the South lol.


A Canadian team hasn't won since 1993... thye've had a lot of insult and injury
quote:

This actually hurts the argument you're making, because if this was meant to apply generally, there was no reason to apply that exclusion specifically only to Indian Tribes. The fact that they felt it necessary to specifically exclude these particular non-citizens implies that they didn't feel the exclusion applied to other non-citizens.


Not really… that’s a non sequitur.

The 14th didn’t contemplate a permanent non citizen resident alien population.

To the extent that it did, Indian tribes, it excluded them from the count.

The 14th is a Reconstruction Amendment, so it is post slavery and 3/5 compromise. This is Enumeration anew. The clear intent is that everyone that ‘lives’ within a states boarders do not necessarily count for apportionment.
quote:

It's going to be very difficult to argue the writers of the 14A didn't understand the difference in "citizen" and "person".


There is a strong legal argument that avoids this with what I'm going to call the "exclusion clause"

quote:

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.


The amendment already considered members of other nations (Indian Tribes) and determined to exclude them from the count. Extending this to residents here illegally is very logical.
quote:

So the answer is let more war inevitably happen?


US involvement in this "war" was one air mission and shooting down missles that we knew were coming.

So yeah... if they spend 10+% of their GDP on war and terrorism, we can just handle it again.