Started By
Message

re: Barry Bonds only had 4 seasons of more than 45 homeruns

Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:32 am to
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
17202 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:32 am to
quote:

In fairness, he played the same amount of college ball Bonds did


You never know. But he will be an age-40-something superstar, like Barry if he does.
Posted by OGtigerfan87
North La
Member since Feb 2019
3950 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:43 am to
Eh i would bet judge has taken and still takes PED's
Posted by tween the hedges
Member since Feb 2012
20637 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:55 am to
Dude had 4 straight years of over .500 OBP. He was intentionally walked 120 times in a season. There will never be another prime like that.

Of course he's a cheating PoS and a huge douche. 755 is real
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60938 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

comparison between Bonds from 1987-2000 and Lou Gehrig's career numbers. They're remarkably similar.




No. No they are not. I just did a comparison and Gehrig is 16% higher than Bonds on every efficiency metric across the board (example: Bonds had a .290 average and Gehrig a .340, same holds for OPS, slugging, and OBP).

Now factoring in his roid years, yes.

To put it in comparison here is Judge’s numbers, from last season, increased by 16%

Adjusted BA: .322 × 1.16 = .373
Adjusted OBP: .458 × 1.16 = .531
Adjusted SLG: .701 × 1.16 = .813
Adjusted OPS: 1.159 × 1.16 = 1.345

No one with the stats on the right would have “remarkably similar” stats to Judge today.
This post was edited on 4/9/25 at 5:56 pm
Posted by West Palm Tiger561
Palm Beach County
Member since Dec 2018
1751 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

His HR average his first 10 seasons was 29.2 HRs, his average before he hit 49 was 31.8 and through the year before he hit 73 was 32.9. In no world is 33 almost 40. So yes, his HR average jumped dramatically after taking steroids, by at least 25%.


1998 is the consensus. From 1993-1997 he was averaging 40 homeruns. I'm not going to include his first several seasons because he wasn't in his prime years yet. So yeah, there was not a big jump in homeruns after steroid use.
Posted by West Palm Tiger561
Palm Beach County
Member since Dec 2018
1751 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

It's not that interesting but a very misleading statement nonetheless

When he was juiced to the gills from 2000-2004, his average per 162 were

.339/.535/.781
1.316 OPS
58 HRs
123 RBIs
197 BBs

During his pre-roid prime from 1992-1999, those numbers were:

.303/.441/.618
1.059 OPS
43 HRs
121 RBIs
136 BBs


His 2001 season highly inflates that average though. Obviously there is a difference, but his one anomaly of season changes those numbers drastically.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60938 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

So yeah, there was not a big jump in homeruns after steroid use.


Bruh ~30 home run jump to 73 is a BIG jump
Posted by DByrd2
Fredericksburg, VA
Member since Jun 2008
10093 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

THE JUDGE has hit 50+ dongs three times and he didn’t even need steroids.


Antibiotics must have worked on multiple occasions…
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48427 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

From 1993-1997 he was averaging 40 homeruns. I'm not going to include his first several seasons because he wasn't in his prime years yet.


You're excluding 2 MVPs, 3 Silver Sluggers, and an MVP runner up season.
This post was edited on 4/9/25 at 7:23 pm
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39420 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:12 pm to
Oh, 2000-2004, Barry phat head prime.

49
73
46
45
45

His career Avg. HRs was 41. Has anyone ever had a greater increase in one year (almost 80%) over their career average?

40 HR avg. used to be power hitter normalcy....then Bonds turned it on his head.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41040 posts
Posted on 4/9/25 at 9:22 pm to
Brady Anderson?
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
18330 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:24 am to
quote:

Brady Anderson


Definitely him.

Maybe Biggio. Maybe Arod. I think Pudge had a season with a whole bunch.

I bet there are several more from that era.
Posted by ChestRockwell
In the heart of horse country
Member since Jul 2021
7683 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:58 am to
He'll break the all time record for strikeouts and lowest post season batting average
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23159 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 7:46 am to
quote:

This is a pretty good career statline, right? .289/.412/.567, 494 HR, 1547 BB, 1189 K, 111.4 bWAR, 3 MVP, 8 Gold Gloves. That's Barry Bonds if he had retired after the 2000 season.


Yep. Barry Bonds went from a clear 1st Ballot HOFr to the arguable the greatest baseball position player ever. Imo, he got pissed with guys like Palmeiro who starting to get to his level and wanted to show everyone what it would look like if the real stud started using PEDs.
Posted by Broyota2
Member since Nov 2010
13703 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 9:36 am to
Bonds was that dude before the juice 3 mvps in 4 years from 90-94. Golden glove winner 90-94. Silver Slugger 90-94. He had it all.

Edit: He also stole 52 bases in 90' which was 3rd in the MLB. Batted .301 33 home runs 114 RBI in 151 games in the Barry bean pole days is impressive.
This post was edited on 4/10/25 at 9:40 am
Posted by bayoujd
Member since Jan 2009
3132 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 1:51 pm to
Bonds is a top 5 player of all time, roids or not. Most of the top players of his time say he was the best in the game by a margin.
Posted by chew4219
Member since Sep 2009
3208 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

The spin rate and speed are incredible these days.


Speed is the same. MLB started to take speed measurements from 2’ after release in 1990, instead of when the ball crossed the plate. In 2017 they started using track man and for more accurate speeds.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216475 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:30 pm to
Not a problem with this. He would still be there even if he didn’t roid. I hated it when his head got huge. He really didn’t need them.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60938 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Bonds is a top 5 player of all time, roids or not.


Pre-Roids Bonds HOF? Definitely

Pre-Roids Bonds Top 5 player all time? The following list of players might have something to say about that:

Babe Ruth
Ted Williams
Lou Gehrig
Jimmie Foxx
Hank Greenberg
Rogers Hornsby
Stan Musial
Ty Cobb
Hank Aaron
Willie Mays
Will Clark
Walter Johnson
Sandy Koufax
Pedro Martinez
Greg Maddux
Randy Johnson
Roger Clemens
Tom Seaver
Bob Gibson
Cy Young
Nolan Ryan
Christy Mathewson
Lefty Grove
Warren Spahn
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216475 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 5:06 pm to
If he stayed roid free he could have finished with great numbers.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram