Started By
Message

re: ATL Thread | offseason hot takes + discussion

Posted on 12/12/22 at 9:46 pm to
Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 12/12/22 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

He was very fortunate, as were we all, that some very low risk moves at the '21 deadline struck gold. That cannot be the standard by which we judge everything he does, forever.


Everyone likes to slob on his nob about that deadline but even he would tell you he didn't expect to get that kind of production out of those guys. He clearly expected them to have some positive regression, but does anyone believe in their heart of hearts that even he thought he was gearing the team up for a deep run, much less a WS? I highly doubt it.

His real legacy that he should get a ton of credit for are all these extensions of good young talent. Some of the other moves (this one, Ozuna, choosing Olson over Freddie) are either bad or TBD and look bad right now.
Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 12/12/22 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

I'm going to go ahead and get my hopes up for Correa.


Think the Giants and maybe Yankees are going to push really hard for him which probably prices us out.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48410 posts
Posted on 12/12/22 at 9:52 pm to
The Braves are sitting around $196M projected payroll, +/- a few million depending on where you look. How high do we think they're really going to go? I'm guessing they'll bring back Duvall on a cheap deal and that will pretty much be it with a few depth pieces. I really think Grissom will be at short and we'll run it back with Duvall/Rosario in left. I don't think we have the ammo left to trade for a big time shortstop or corner outfielder.
Posted by Dale Murphy
God's Country
Member since Feb 2005
24964 posts
Posted on 12/12/22 at 10:10 pm to
Are there any expensive underperforming SS we could trade bad contract for bad contract and hope they turn it around? Preferably one that doesn’t suck on defense.
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
41214 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 1:58 am to
Interesting late night note. After today’s trade FanGraphs projects the Braves to have the best record in baseball.

Dodgers about $100M below last year’s payroll right now so if they add a couple big pieces they will likely jump us. Astros also could.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54445 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 7:19 am to
There was no reason to trade Conteras. I’m a bit bummed about it.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62698 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 7:26 am to
I watched a handful of podcasts and takes on this trade. I have thoughts that I’ll come back and share when I have more time. But check out this one if you have time. 2 guys with no affiliations to any of the 3 teams. It’s called The Just Baseball Show. 18 and a half minutes long. The 1st 11+ are them shitting on the A’s for getting fleeced, wondering how AA keeps doing it to them.

Then they try to talk about the Braves and one guy can’t let the A’s go and goes back to shitting on them because “it’s so infuriating. If I am an A’s fan, I am considering leaving this team. This is the most uncompetitive, terrible trade. I have no words for them. None. Alex Anthopolis fleece. Now let’s talk about the Braves.”

Sean Murphy Traded to Braves Instant Reaction

They go through the Braves lineup as is, putting Grissom at SS and Ozuna in LF and TDA at DH. Guy 1 lists starting rotation of Fried, Strider, Wright, Morton, and Soroka.
Guy 2: “…so freaking elite. That is such a sick team.”

They touch on the Mets, Phillies, Dodgers, how great the sport of baseball is, and wind up talking about the Brewers part of the deal, which they liked because of the offensive upgrade of Contreras and being able to keep Adames. The pitchers they got were kinda “meh” throw ins. Speaking of “meh,” they “meh”ed all over Muller for most of the podcast, mostly while talking about the A’s, obviously.

And these guys have no emotional investment in any of the 3 teams—I think 1 might be a Mets fan and the other a Yankee. But it was interesting to get an outsider’s, objective take on it that I found interesting. I said I’d have more thoughts when I had more time, but I damn near transcribed the whole pod, so I could have just left the link and gave my thoughts. But I wanted to try to make sure you listened. There’s a lot more, and they were pretty entertaining, so do try to listen to the first 15 minutes of you have time. I do have more thoughts, but a couple from this and listening to AA:

—Murphy is a lot better than we think/thought and is/was valued much more highly than we realized
—5+ teams were in on him and the A’s rejected some pretty big hauls
—AA REALLY values defense from the catcher position
—Murphy is more than just a Gold Glove winner, AA talked about his daily mental prep with the starters and how great he is at calling a game
—AA mentioned he was a great teammate; by itself, pretty benign comment. However, it may have been as much about Contreras as Murphy. Dale Murphy (the poster) texted me what are supposedly the text receipts that Contreras may not have been that popular in the clubhouse. Unnamed former Brave: “I didn’t like him as a teammate.”
—reading between the lines a bit, but Murphy was not just an upgrade defensively behind the plate, AA didn’t think he was good enough to play there every day at all once TDA’s done
—more assumptions, but I don’t think AA thinks he will hit enough to be a full-time, long-term DH. Unfortunately, we just can’t address that with Ozuna and Rosario still on the books, but I think they will upgrade that significantly either at the deadline or after the season
—I think another move for SS or LF is likely, but he’s not gonna force one he doesn’t love. I think he’s willing to go into April with Grissom/Arcia at short, Rosario and probably Duvall platooning in left, with a Murphy/TDA/Ozuna holding down the DH spot and seeing how it goes.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54445 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 7:50 am to
Good post. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
26700 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 8:02 am to
quote:

The Braves are sitting around $196M projected payroll, +/- a few million depending on where you look. How high do we think they're really going to go?


Hopefully will get in the range of the Mets payroll.


Divided by 2.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62698 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 8:05 am to
quote:

There was no reason to trade Conteras.


To get a better player at the same position

Think about this. Contreras is younger, cheaper, under team control for 6 years instead of 3, made the All-Star team as a DH (super weak field, but still), but Murphy was the one with the super hot market. Was there even a market for Contreras at all? At maybe the most important position on the field? All those things I listed and teams were packaging 4 players for a Murphy deal while Contreras was just 1 of the 5 in the deal that got done. Does that not scream how differently the 2 were valued by the rest of baseball? We watch our guys every day for years and can’t help but get emotionally invested, and it makes it almost impossible to look at these things objectively.

But you—we—have to be self-aware enough to know that and try to take a 10,000 foot view of these things after the initial knee-jerk reaction. I was hoping we’d trade Contreras, because I think he’s kinda fool’s gold, and we were never gonna get as much for him as we could now. So I was kinda pumped when I heard about this, because I assumed we were getting Adames too to fill the hole at SS. When I found out we weren’t, my knee jerk was to be super pissed. “What the frick are we doing trading Billy and a bunch of pitchers and not even filling our 2 gaping holes?!!!!”

Then I took a step back and realized Murphy is a fricking dude, and all the pitchers we gave up are just “aight.” This is another way our perceptions are warped. Our farm sucks. Our prospects are simply not very valued. Just because a guy might be our 6th best prospect doesn’t mean he’d even be in other clubs top 20. And that’s ok. Because we don’t have spots for them anyway with everybody locked up. We have some elite arms, but they’re 19 or 20 years old and not projected to make it to the majors until ‘26. Which is about the time we’ll need them. The advantage of locking all these guys up long-term is it gives us a few years to rebuild the farm.

Or I could just be lying to myself to keep from crying.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54445 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 8:08 am to
Oh, you’re right. Bill’s trade value was never going to be higher.
Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 8:23 am to
quote:

But you—we—have to be self-aware enough to know that and try to take a 10,000 foot view of these things after the initial knee-jerk reaction. I was hoping we’d trade Contreras, because I think he’s kinda fool’s gold, and we were never gonna get as much for him as we could now.


Yeah this is what a lot of teams who trade players to the Rays and Brewers think, and it turns out to be wrong more times than not

Think Bill DHs a bunch this year and plays some catcher, and they really work with him in the offseason behind the plate. With his ceiling as a hitter he doesn't have to be a stalwart defensively, he just has to be serviceable.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62698 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 8:24 am to
quote:

sorantable




Make no mistake, I WANTED to find reasons to make it make sense. I could be completely full of shite.

And I don’t think AA can do no wrong or walks on water or any such nonsense. I am not familiar with the other GMs of non Mets, Phillies, Yankees, Dodgers, and Padres’ payrolls. AA could be an average GM. He could be fricking terrible. I don’t know how he stacks up. It’s fair to say he inherited a pretty sweet situation. Also fair to say he got incredibly lucky with Soler/Rosario/Joc in ‘21 (though I do think saw something in them that he thought may work—he didn’t just close his eyes and throw darts).

And this move isn’t some incredible genius fleecing. Even if it works out. Or could blow up in his face. Murphy could frick up his knees and turn into Ozzie Virgil. Muller could add some velo and turn into Clay Kershaw. But I think I’ve at least convinced myself that the logic was sound. But again, I could just be lying to myself and have just wasted over an hour writing a thesis on complete and utter bullshite.
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
904 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 8:29 am to
The Braves lost nothing in this deal and gained the 2nd best catcher in baseball. The fact that so many fans seem irked by the trade is mind boggling. There are hundreds of Mullers out there. Contreras is easily replaceable. Heck, Tromp will probably be better if given a chance.

Bottom line is we just added another All a star to the roster for a bunch of guys we’ll probably never hear about again. Sure, we have some holes, but everyone does. Bottom line top to bottom we are a better team today than yesterday.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48410 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 8:36 am to
My thoughts today haven't changed a ton. We're going to be happy with Murphy and he is an upgrade.

We're basically tapped out of trade assets (unless AA can convince someone that Ian Anderson just needs a change of scenery and isn't potentially facing long term shoulder problems) and priced out of big ticket free agents with holes still to patch in LF and SS. I believe the Braves are going to roll the dice and go with Grissom at short, and I think Duvall comes back to platoon with Rosario in left while hoping Ozuna can hit like it's 2020.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48410 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Contreras is easily replaceable. Heck, Tromp will probably be better if given a chance.


Contreras was a big time bat and started the All Star Game. Chadwick Tromp is not filling that void.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62698 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Yeah this is what a lot of teams who trade players to the Rays and Brewers think, and it turns out to be wrong more times than not


Well those teams have great scouting departments. It’s why they’ve been competitive for the better part of a decade. Longer for the Rays. And that has netted them all of 2 World Series appearances combined. Both of which the Rays lost. You’d rather be those guys?

Hell, we WERE those guys, just collecting prospects and getting bounced in the 1st round. And the criticism back then was we never did anything with our prospects, never pushed our chips in to make a serious run, just hung on to them until they fizzled out in the minors and lost their value. Now, we’ve pushed them all in—almost literally—and should have a nice 5,6,7 year window of deep runs that, with a little luck, could see us holding that big trophy a couple more times. Or not. But this strategy is a lot more fun.

quote:

Think Bill DHs a bunch this year and plays some catcher, and they really work with him in the offseason behind the plate. With his ceiling as a hitter he doesn't have to be a stalwart defensively, he just has to be serviceable.


Maybe so. I hope he does. I still like him. But what I’ve learned the last 18 hours is that “serviceable” is not good enough for AA at that position. He thinks—rightly or wrongly—that having an elite defensive catcher is more valuable than just the ways that are quantifiable. And fricking everything is quantifiable now. (frame rate came up a bunch—I don’t know how many runs that’s worth, but I bet there’s a big gap between the 2). But I’m talking more about how Murphy studies opposing lineups, preps with the day’s starting pitcher and the guys available in the pen and has a plan on how to attack them in various situations. AA thinks he makes pitchers better. Whether or not he does or whether or not that makes any kind of significant difference, I have no idea. But I think that’s his thinking.

And I do think there’s something there with the teammate thing and how AA thinks each would affect team chemistry.
Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 9:05 am to
quote:

You’d rather be those guys?


How did you get to this from what I said?

I'd rather have a 24 year old who has already been in an all-star game who plays at a premium position than not have him.
Posted by TrussvilleTide
The Endless Void
Member since Sep 2021
4069 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 9:13 am to
From Fangraphs write up on the trade: Basically they feel like it wasn't necessary to use resources to upgrade a position we were already strong in, but its still a good trade for the Braves. As for the Brewers side:

quote:

Because now it’s time to come down to Milwaukee’s role in this trade. If you want to know why your life is harder than it should be, you should become familiar with an economic concept called rent-seeking. Rent-seeking is the behavior of middlemen, people or more often companies that insert themselves between the people who produce goods and services and those who consume them, charging additional fees and exploiting regulatory loopholes while providing little or no additional value to the proposition. Examples include: Health insurance companies, Ticketmaster, rideshare and gig economy startups. Think sub-cable company levels of cost-to-usefulness ratio and you’ll be on the right track.

That’s how much the Brewers won this trade.

Milwaukee is one of the few teams that sits in the middle of the Venn diagram of 1) having designs on competing in 2023 and 2) being nearly as hard-up for offense as the A’s. They got a middle-of-the-order bat, at a premium position and under team control from now until the Sun swallows the Earth, plus a live bullpen arm and a hard-throwing Double-A reliever. And all it cost them was a young outfielder they didn’t think they could use. They inserted themselves into a process — Atlanta wants Murphy, Oakland wants rid of Murphy — and came out way ahead while risking little. It feels like it should be against the rules somehow.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81290 posts
Posted on 12/13/22 at 10:34 am to
Yeah, it was a total fleecing
Jump to page
Page First 26 27 28 29 30 ... 62
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 28 of 62Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram