- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
With this defense, MVB would just need to be average
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:47 pm
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:47 pm
And we are in the playoff. We don’t need a JD or JB just need someone to effing throw a deep ball and pull a read option. And if Sloan is capable call some designed QB draws vs three man fronts.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:52 pm to SwampdogDC
This is so eerily similar to 2023, and we’ll be crying for years about how we would’ve easily won a national title in 2023 and in 2025 had Brian Kelly simply made the changes that hundreds of thousands of fans saw needed to be made but he was too stubborn to admit there was a problem.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 10:07 pm to SwampdogDC
Average mobile MVB is better than what we have had.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 10:12 pm to SwampdogDC
A guy that can tuck it and run for 6 or 7 on third downs here or there would go a long way
Posted on 10/1/25 at 10:22 pm to Words
quote:
6 or 7
Jeez. Don't say that around the kids.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 10:28 pm to SwampdogDC
I’m not so sure this defense is as good as we all think. Achilles heel from last year appears to still be there (mobile QBs). Appears to be good against regular running attacks. Pass D is ok. Not a lot of pressure generated by DL. Blitz is effective, but leaves some vulnerability.
MVB’s ability to add another dimension to our ground game is critical. But, how good of a passer is he really?
MVB’s ability to add another dimension to our ground game is critical. But, how good of a passer is he really?
Posted on 10/1/25 at 10:50 pm to SwampdogDC
Maybe. We don’t really know. Nuss was above average and we barely beat a bad Clemson team. I think they’re really good but this defense has only faced one above average offense so far.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 10:51 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
This is so eerily similar to 2023, and we’ll be crying for years about how we would’ve easily won a national title in 2023 and in 2025 had Brian Kelly simply made the changes that hundreds of thousands of fans saw needed to be made but he was too stubborn to admit there was a problem.
What changes during the 2023 season could BK have made that would have easily lead to a national championship?
Posted on 10/1/25 at 11:19 pm to SwampdogDC
He just needs to be Stetson Bennett level and I believe he is
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:10 am to SwampdogDC
I'd still rather a healthy Nuss though.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:16 am to SwampdogDC
quote:
MVB would just need to be average
By putting it this way, does that mean MVB will be starting next Saturday night?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 1:39 am to lsucjn
quote:
not so sure this defense is as good as we all think
That would be a valid concern, given that Trinidad Chambliss and the Rebs converted a nauseating number of third and fourth down plays last Saturday. And their was nothing exotic about any of the conversions: generally short quick-hitting passes, very "vanilla" calls executed without any defensive resistance at all.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 5:19 am to lsucjn
quote:agree - they were exposed last week.
not so sure this defense is as good as we all think. Achilles heel from last year appears to still be there (mobile QBs). Appears to be good against regular running attacks. Pass D is ok. Not a lot of pressure generated by DL. Blitz is effective, but leaves some vulnerability.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 5:25 am to SwampdogDC
Dont kid yourself, this defense isnt what you think it is. Ole Miss receivers were running wide open most of the night. The final series where we absolutely had to have a stop, is a clear indicator of things to come
And MVB left Moo St for a reason. He was (1-7) while there, and they are now (4-1) without him
You do the math
And MVB left Moo St for a reason. He was (1-7) while there, and they are now (4-1) without him
You do the math
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:26 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Dont kid yourself, this defense isnt what you think it is. Ole Miss receivers were running wide open most of the night. The final series where we absolutely had to have a stop, is a clear indicator of things to come And MVB left Moo St for a reason. He was (1-7) while there, and they are now (4-1) without him You do the math
This is just incorrect on so many levels.
1. The defense was gassed because they were on the field so much. Ole Miss first two series were 3 and out. Our defense is elite
2. Miss. State is a completely different team this year. MVB would be playing with better players here and is a year older
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:32 am to HollowKnight
quote:
2. Miss. State is a completely different team this year. MVB would be playing with better players here and is a year older
In addition, he actually looked good for a true freshman in some really big games, especially on the road at Ga.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:38 am to SwampdogDC
Matt Mauck wins an SEC championship with this team.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 6:52 am to lsucjn
quote:
MVB’s ability to add another dimension to our ground game is critical. But, how good of a passer is he really?
Put on his game against Georgia last year. His deep ball was on the money.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:21 am to SwampdogDC
The defense didn’t do that much better agsinst Ole Miss than our D did last year.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:42 am to SwampdogDC
MVB is more suited to the current style of offense Sloan and BK want to run.
For Nuss and our O-Line, a Les Miles offense would probably be better. Get under center and stop having the running back take the ball 5 yards deep waiting for a hole to open up that never does.
For Nuss and our O-Line, a Les Miles offense would probably be better. Get under center and stop having the running back take the ball 5 yards deep waiting for a hole to open up that never does.
Popular
Back to top

15





