Started By
Message

re: Who should have been hired instead of BK?

Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:40 am to
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
37765 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:40 am to
quote:

If any name on that list had been hired in 2021, this place would have been apoplectic



This board was apoplectic over BK for 24 hours in 2021.

People melted because we just hired that northerner prick dinosaur who never won a big game and was involved in the scissor lift incident for $100 million.

Then people calmed down and tried to reassure and convince themselves.


The ADs job is not to appease the fanbase. The ADs job is find the candidate that will work best at LSU.


Clearly BK in his 60s was not the best choice.
This post was edited on 11/7/25 at 7:42 am
Posted by Blueghost1978
Metairie, LA
Member since Jan 2024
911 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:46 am to
Knowing what I know now? ALOT of different possibilities.
Posted by p226
Lafayette
Member since Sep 2016
2213 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Lanning is a good answer.


Lanning was never coming to LSU.
Posted by onepiecemayne
Member since Nov 2023
1225 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:56 am to
This place said as long as LSU didn't hire an idiot, that coach would win a championship since Les Miles and Coach O did.
Posted by White Tiger
Dallas
Member since Jul 2007
15737 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:59 am to
I think Lane would have been a much better hire.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6653 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 7:59 am to
I think at the time Kiffin was the right person. I think he would have had a championship with JD and would not have allowed the Matt House failure. Would not have hired him.
Posted by Geauxldilocks
Member since Aug 2018
6514 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:00 am to
If Woody had properly hired Lane, Woody would still be AD and the toast of the town. He’d be untouchable by Landry.
Posted by Houtexlandscape
Houston
Member since May 2018
621 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:01 am to
Woody never vetted him by checking his relationships with former players and coaches- If he would have done that - he would not have been hired
Posted by White Tiger
Dallas
Member since Jul 2007
15737 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:01 am to
Well that view was absolutely incorrect. So the signs were misunderstood.
Posted by Houtexlandscape
Houston
Member since May 2018
621 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:01 am to
Woody never vetted him by checking his relationships with former players and coaches- If he would have done that - he would not have been hired
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
24561 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Bk looked good on paper.


Not really
Posted by White Tiger
Dallas
Member since Jul 2007
15737 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:02 am to
All massively better than that loser Kelly
Posted by Gnash
Cypress, Tx
Member since Oct 2015
11024 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Woody never vetted him by checking his relationships with former players and coaches- If he would have done that - he would not have been hired

Gordon McKernan yesterday made it sound like Woody was doing what the BOS told him to do by hiring BK
Posted by Gnash
Cypress, Tx
Member since Oct 2015
11024 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Clearly BK in his 60s was not the best choice

The landscape of the sport has shifted dramatically even since BK took the job.
The way he built a program at Cincinnati 20 years ago and ND 10-15 years ago may not be the way to do it anymore.
Hire someone young that has proven to win in this current landscape and someone willing to adapt.
Posted by chaso
clinton ms.
Member since Aug 2006
3289 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:37 am to
BK was like Les Miles? Maybe you worked with both of them or knew them both personally? If you only knew them through a fans lens then I would have to disagree with you completely!
Posted by That One
Northern Virginia
Member since Jul 2004
6092 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 8:39 am to
Any assistant coach with reasonable P5 experience, inexpensive (3 mil or less per year ->more NIL money), 3-4 year contract, young, and willing to put in the work with no bull-shite, and no fake drama trying to "fit" in. Basically an UNKNOWN would have worked better!
Worst case, we could have had the same results and contract would be over!
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
26262 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Kelly was a mistake, but Kiffin isnt the best hire we couldve made over him.

Yep, no one could have predicted Kiffin becoming his best self on and off the field; he has literally changed his lifestyle for the better.

Kelly on the other hand seems to be going down a downward spiral. He just gave up on LSU.
Posted by Thorny
Montgomery, AL
Member since May 2008
2267 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Thinking we’re too good for whomever is costly. Have an open mind and have a broad interview process that is more inclusive than exclusive.


You are talking common sense, when you know that isn't welcomed here.



GEAUX TIGERS!
Posted by Superfluous Tiger
Houston
Member since Nov 2021
1000 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:33 am to
quote:

was involved in the scissor lift incident for $100 million


Most people didn't know about that. Give me a break.
Posted by OU812
Michigan
Member since Apr 2004
13670 posts
Posted on 11/7/25 at 9:38 am to
Joe Dean or was it Broadhead that should have hired Steve Spurrier instead of Mike Archer?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram