Started By
Message

re: USC practically shut down our running game playing 2 high safeties all night

Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:01 pm to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61430 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

You’re supposed to run a team out of that coverage and force them to bring another safety into the box. We could not. Offensive line play is not what it was supposed to be. That’s the most disappointing take away from the other night. That does not bode well for our future games against legit SEC defensive lines.
They subbed their safeties with two crashing DEs.....now, why we didnt expose that will be a mystery till end of time.
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
20148 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

We don’t have a dominant RB. It’s just that simple. They are just average RB at best.
the problem isn't at RB
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
20148 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Emery had 10 carries for 61 yds

He should have gotten the ball 20 times.
Emery did well, but one of his carries was for 39 yards. That was an outlier.

Other than that one big run, he had 9 carries for 22 yards.
Posted by des4271
Member since Oct 2014
4682 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:20 pm to
I agree to read that crashing DE and keep it but I don’t think they want Nussmeier running because they are scared of having to play one of the backups. They will have to do it at some point to keep defenses honest.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
29313 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

JD had 1100+ rushing yards, the next person, Logan Diggs, was at about 650~ yards and it slides further down between the next 5 running backs

Diggs was able to run well last year. Once he started suffering injuries, is when Daniels had to be super man running the ball every game.

Diggs got no less than 97 yards when he carried the ball more than 9 times. In his first 6 games, 5 of them he carried the ball at least 14 times. He had no less than 5.3 ypc in any of those games. He was literally 3 yards away in two seperate games from having five 100+ yard rushing games in his first 6 games.

People, LSU can run the ball, and they will run the ball. They just have to make Kaleb Jackson the lead back and feed him. Also, don't run into ridiculous stacked fronts. We have receivers galore and Nuss isn't a chump. If i was them, I'd also have a Rickie Collins package. Let him run some read option during some games.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
29313 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

We don’t have a dominant RB. It’s just that simple. They are just average RB at best.
This right here is a lazy and casual thought. Anybody that thinks this should not be debating anybody here.

Truth of the matter is, they need to change up what they are doing in the run game and when to do it.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
21023 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Running inside zone from the shotgun with a mesh means slow developing and backs not getting a running start. You have to have elite run blocking for that to work, especially when the defense doesn’t respect the QB run or and RPO pass options, because we never MADE them respect them.


Yep. And also IMO if we have this big nasty OL that they are supposed to be then have them firing off the line and mauling guys and getting a push.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
6278 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

but one of his carries was for 39 yards


Yeah, because HE made it happen with his power and speed. You can't throw that out. That's moronic
Posted by eod
Covington
Member since Sep 2020
96 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 1:58 pm to
Take away JE 66 yards, leaves 51 for 24 carries or 2.1 per carry.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
30749 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 2:11 pm to
No they did not play 2 high safeties. One was the leading tackler with 9 (6 SOLO) and their corner was in the box a ton and he had 6 tackles (3 solo) if I remember right. They shut down things because 52% of their tackles were SOLO. They were better tacklers and our line didn’t win the battles they needed to. There was diversity in plays without question. Execution was shite
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
35957 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

my oh my how we miss those effective bubble screens jimbo used to run a nd those effective jet sweeps matt canada used to run. throw in some real toss sweeps(not that short toss we saw albeit it was effective to a degree) and you would have a nice outside game to open up the middle and spread them out up front. when they move up to play all that you hit them behind them with passes. playcalling on down and distance and play type was dogshit.


I would love to see at least 2 or 3 jets per game and multiple WR screens when the DBs play off. Then fake both if they are successful to make the defense think about where the ball is going.

I did like the motion run from Thomas, even though it went off tackle. We need more creative runs like that getting the defense’s eyes moving all over.
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
35957 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

Why didn’t we run a RPO or any trick plays. Nothing else was working much in 2nd half.


All of those slow mesh handoffs were options. Some were read options, but at least a few were likely RPOs. Nuss just never threw out of them. That has to happen going forward.
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
35957 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

We did this. It's like you people didn't watch the game. A quick bubble to Zavion Thomas for a pretty decent gain.


We need more when the opposing front 7 is constantly crashing the middle and doesn’t respect the outside because they don’t think you will stick with it. That’s what USC and they were right- we didn’t stick with runs outside and screens to make them back off. We played into their strategy.
Posted by misey94
Member since Jan 2007
35957 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

IMO, we should have been under center a lot more.


That is highly unlikely. However, we do run Pistol and that gives you more balance and power run options in the run game while retaining the same snap style.
Posted by Mandtgr47
Member since Aug 2024
7918 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

leaves 51 for 24 carries or 2.1 per carry.


I'll go one step farther.....we ran the ball 9 times in the 4th quarter on 3 possessions....we had a net total of 15 yards. Outside of the 2 runs by emory on the TD drive, we ran it 11 times for 22 yards. We ran 4 times in the third quarter, and 9 in the 4th quarter....that was the difference in the game.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49668 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

I'm all for modern offense but I guess I'm old school when it comes to the run game. I'm not saying go back to the I and run toss dive all game but I'd love to see some off tackle from the Pistol. Maybe even two tight. Give the back a running start and give the O line time to move guys up front.


I actually think they should some I form packages as part of the offense. Not that you will run it much or even every game but have that ability. If LSU would have had done some of these sunday night they would have fricked up USC's world IMO. Which would have forced them not to be so aggressive or if they had stayed that way you easily hit them over the top.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55459 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

And CBK continued to run it despite there being 8 guys in the box.
lol
How could there be 8 guys in the box if there were two high safeties?
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
70672 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

I actually think they should some I form packages as part of the offense. Not that you will run it much or even every game but have that ability. If LSU would have had done some of these sunday night they would have fricked up USC's world IMO. Which would have forced them not to be so aggressive or if they had stayed that way you easily hit them over the top.


1. Do we even have a fullback?

2. None of our tight ends look to be very good blockers
Posted by Primeminister337
Member since Apr 2016
659 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 7:30 pm to
I think it’s been said, but when a team struggle like that you have to creative and have “extension of the run” plays. Things like bubble screens, wr end around gives, maybe even a wildcat when ya get to the redzone (and I hate wildcat) but ya get the point
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49668 posts
Posted on 9/4/24 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

1. Do we even have a fullback?

2. None of our tight ends look to be very good blockers


Not that I know of and I think that is a mistake. You could always use one of your most athletic O or D lineman.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram