Started By
Message

re: The targeting ejection on Skalski

Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:17 pm to
Posted by SouthdownsTiger4178
Member since Jun 2018
1951 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:17 pm to

Wouldn't have changed the outcome....
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83344 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:20 pm to
nah, frick that noise


If this gets you ejected:



then that Skalski hit is definitely an ejection
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:20 pm to
Clemson's defense was not the same when that dude left. He was playing lights out too.
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14779 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Wouldn't have changed the outcome....


No it would not have. We were the better team.

I just want to see the physicality of the game thrive and officiating have as little impact as possible
Posted by 00 Tech Grad
My homestead, AL
Member since Nov 2009
10694 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:22 pm to
It’s not going to be a popular opinion, but Chaisson made a very similar hit later in the game that I thought was going to get him ejected. If they were being consistent, they’d have called that too.

They need to change the rule.
This post was edited on 1/14/20 at 10:24 pm
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9292 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

It just wasn’t right and you’ve gotta take off the P&G glasses and see that was horrible for the game of football.

I think most people agree that the rule sucks. But I don’t see why we should be white-knighting for the guy either. Every team including LSU has been burned by the targeting rule. Hell, it was part of the reason Clemson was in the championship game.

So sure, I think the rule should change to get rid of the ejection. But unless or until it does, players need to adapt. Skalski’s ejection was the right thing for the game because anything else would have amounted to ignoring the rules we’ve all had to follow for years now.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23651 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:27 pm to
What he did was old school spearing. That was illegal in the 70s. Nothing new about it. Still illegal. Still too dangerous to tolerate.
This post was edited on 1/14/20 at 10:28 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51345 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:28 pm to
He also launched
Posted by mtemplet
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2006
1619 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:28 pm to
He put the hit on burrow before the half of the TD to Moss. I thought that hit was targeting as well.
Posted by lsusince60
New Iberia
Member since Jan 2005
1426 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

There is a proper way to tackle. See what you hit.


Had Saints DB Williams had his head up he would have made the tackle on Diggs sending the Saints to the SB.
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7628 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

It’s not going to be a popular opinion, but Chaisson made a very similar hit later in the game that I thought was going to get him ejected. If they were being consistent, they’d have called that too.


You talking about the hit on Lawrence?

If it's the one I think you are thinking of, Chiasson's head was up and Lawrence was s runner at that time.

Totally different circumstance, Skalski used the crown of his helmet, Chiasson didn't
Posted by ForeverEllisHugh
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
14779 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

He put the hit on burrow before the half of the TD to Moss. I thought that hit was targeting as well.


Go watch it again. It was shoulder to ribs. Injured him but within the rules.
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7628 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

He put the hit on burrow before the half of the TD to Moss. I thought that hit was targeting as well


In real time it looked like it, but it was actually a great form tackle. He put his head to the side and drove through Burrow with his shoulder.

His head was still down but he didnt make contact with his helmet.
Posted by Philippines4LSU
Member since May 2018
8789 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

The Ohio St rejection in their last game was similar imo. That's why I didn't feel it was a bad call.


Lawrence lowered his head right before impact. It looked to me like the OSU player was going for the chest and Lawrence sort of ducked into the hit.

I thought the ejection last night was a much easier call to make.
Posted by TheJuicey
Arkansas
Member since Aug 2019
3505 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:38 pm to
False that was textbook targeting. Argue for a Targeting 1 and 2 foul, but that would still be the worse of the 2
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7628 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

Lawrence lowered his head right before impact. It looked to me like the OSU player was going for the chest and Lawrence sort of ducked into the hit


Doesnt matter, Wade was looking at the ground and tackled leading with the crown of his helmet.

It was targeting by the rule in place, it wasnt that he made contact with Lawrence's head it was that the contact he initiated was with the crown of his helmet.

Head up to tackle and no targeting
Posted by Philippines4LSU
Member since May 2018
8789 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

Don't know if you played the game or not but I did and was taught from Jr. high on not to lower your head not because of penalties but because of how dangerous it is to lower your head and hit with the crown.


I was taught to not lead with the crown because you miss more tackles doing that than when you put your shoulder into the guy’s waist or legs and wrap up.

Back then they didn’t know as much about concussions and CTE was an acronym no one had ever heard of.

Point being, there’s plenty of good reasons to avoid doing what Skalski did. He could’ve Jack Tatumed somebody.
Posted by lsusince60
New Iberia
Member since Jan 2005
1426 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:42 pm to
quote:

I just want to see the physicality of the game thrive




Words that might more honestly assess this kind of behavior – “brutality,” “cruelty,” “violence,” etc. – sound so darned unsportsmanlike!



Posted by JakeFromStateFarm
*wears khakis
Member since Jun 2012
11892 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:43 pm to
Well if Captain Neckroll would quit lowering his head and launching himself into people (he did the same thing before the half info Burrow’s ribs) he could stay in the game.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37437 posts
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

I’m talking about EJECTION. It was a legit penalty


And that’s the way the rule is written
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram