18
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Senate passes PCSA this evening
Posted on 9/28/26 at 10:38 pm
Posted on 9/28/26 at 10:38 pm
ESPN article
Come on Mike Johnson. Call the House to vote before YE so Trinidad can be ineligible. Would become a Tiger legend
Come on Mike Johnson. Call the House to vote before YE so Trinidad can be ineligible. Would become a Tiger legend
Posted on 9/29/26 at 5:54 am to KwoodTiger
Wait is there even a possibility he’d be ineligible
Posted on 9/29/26 at 6:02 am to KwoodTiger
Is this something that’s good or bad for LSU and the other powerhouses? Is it going to empower petty little tyrants like Sankey?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 6:05 am to KwoodTiger
Once the PCSA goes into law, 5 for 5 becomes the enforceable rule.
Also appears NCAA gets antitrust exemption. And, NCAA has deemed ineligible.
Also appears NCAA gets antitrust exemption. And, NCAA has deemed ineligible.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 6:33 am to KwoodTiger
Well if Corey Booker is one of the most outspoken opponents of the bill then I’m all for it
Posted on 9/29/26 at 6:42 am to KwoodTiger
I am against this based on the last minute resolution they changed. The bill capped coaches salaries at $5 million. They changed that at the last minute to have no cap.
If they can cap players ability to earn, then coaches should be capped also. This shows that this bill is not intended to support players….it is intended to take away their rights in a free market.
If they can cap players ability to earn, then coaches should be capped also. This shows that this bill is not intended to support players….it is intended to take away their rights in a free market.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 6:47 am to NewBeginnings
There are too many amendments to fully understand the purpose of this.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 6:53 am to IM_4_LSU
Never let a good opportunity to stuff the bill with BS pass you by…
Posted on 9/29/26 at 6:59 am to KwoodTiger
quote:
Call the House to vote before YE so Trinidad can be ineligible.
Haven't we done enough to Ole Miss already!. Let the man play one last year.....
Trinidad did not get to play his first 3 years. So let him play....
Great sportsmen enhance the spirit of competition....
Also we have already played Ole Miss...so we do not benefit if he is in-eligible.
Also it is in our best interest that Ole Miss keeps winning. A 9,10 win Ole Miss makes the loss more managable.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:05 am to NewBeginnings
quote:
I am against this based on the last minute resolution they changed. The bill capped coaches salaries at $5 million. They changed that at the last minute to have no cap. If they can cap players ability to earn, then coaches should be capped also. This shows that this bill is not intended to support players….it is intended to take away their rights in a free market.
NFL and NBA have player caps and no coach cap.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:07 am to KwoodTiger
quote:
Senate passes PCSA this evening
The thing, I most hate this bill is that it allows only one transfer without having to sit out an year. It should be one transfer for everyone and another one for those that have graduated and have an year of eligibility. I would of course love the un-limited transfer. It empowers players....
Unlimited transfers help schools re-build faster like we did in 2022. Otherwise we would have played 2022 with 50 odd players and bottomed out in the SEC. Also it distributes players evenly between teams and reduces depth. Guys like Jarred Lee had to sit out all 4 years behind Jordan Jefferson. This makes the game more competitive....In short coaches are forced to earn their salary.....not play golf like a certain $95 million coach we had earlier.
Overall a bad bill for powerhouses like LSU.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:07 am to NewBeginnings
Well we know that you are a democrat. You want the regular injuns to be making the same or more as the chiefs.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:08 am to mike4lsu
quote:
Also we have already played Ole Miss...so we do not benefit if he is in-eligible. Also it is in our best interest that Ole Miss keeps winning. A 9,10 win Ole Miss makes the loss more managable.
Until Ole Miss has to forfeit all of their games for knowingly playing an ineligible player.
The NCAA will have antitrust exemption so can do whatever they want without legal recourse.
The melt would be next level epic.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:10 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
NFL and NBA have player caps and no coach cap.
Privacy•A
that poster is of the opinion of most democrats, that the average joe worker should be making the same as the owners. In some respects, it is their way of wealth redistribution.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:10 am to KwoodTiger
quote:
Come on Mike Johnson. Call the House to vote
The guy sent the House on early recess and they’re not coming back until November.
There’s no chance this bill gets a vote before the new congress is sat.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:15 am to mike4lsu
quote:
Overall a bad bill for powerhouses like LSU.
no it isn't. It just isn't letting the players run wild anymore. It rewards them, but doesn't allow them to make more than some coaches...which they SHOULD NOT be doing. Just like college prep, if they are good enough they will make their money when they move to the next level. It is obvious that you are a dem.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:20 am to mike4lsu
quote:
Overall a bad bill for powerhouses like LSU.
I think this gives better coaches a huge advantage. And lsu has one of the best.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:25 am to NewBeginnings
quote:
If they can cap players ability to earn, then coaches should be capped also. This shows that this bill is not intended to support players….it is intended to take away their rights in a free market.
So like the NFL and NBA?
Mahomes would make over $100 million a year by your theory.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:27 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
Is this something that’s good or bad for LSU and the other powerhouses? Is it going to empower petty little tyrants like Sankey?
It’s bad. Sankey has shown selective enforcement and he can be influenced by the most liberal elements in the SEC to punish LSU largely on political reasons.
Kill this bill and keep the kangaroo courts as fair mediators.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:32 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
Is it going to empower petty little tyrants like Sankey?
Yes it will
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News