
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:39 am to NewBeginnings
quote:
If they can cap players ability to earn, then coaches should be capped also.
This shows that this bill is not intended to support players….it is intended to take away their rights in a free market.
You couldn't be more wrong.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:16 am to mike4lsu
quote:
mike4lsu
I genuinely feel sorry for you as a fan - really of any sport. Your posts in this thread alone... Is this how you think?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:22 am to Honkus
quote:
First of all he didn't leave the team, they gave him an ultimatum to sign an extension or hit the road.
Lane should publicly support this, and say “if this rule were in effect, I would not have been forced to leave my team for refusing to sign an extension prior to the playoffs”.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:24 am to lsusteve1
LSU Steve - your comments are true.
What I have a hang up on, is that most times these coaches are the highest paid public employees in their state. The job doesn't require that to be the case, as their job isn't that important, on the scale of what should be important...I hope that capping an employee's salary is rooted in that premise. If the pay bands for a coach are infinite, then you can't curb what is truly an issue, maybe the issue, aside of the players.
What I have a hang up on, is that most times these coaches are the highest paid public employees in their state. The job doesn't require that to be the case, as their job isn't that important, on the scale of what should be important...I hope that capping an employee's salary is rooted in that premise. If the pay bands for a coach are infinite, then you can't curb what is truly an issue, maybe the issue, aside of the players.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:30 am to GeauxLaneTrain
quote:
Wait is there even a possibility he’d be ineligible
I think according to the NCAA he already is ineligible.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:56 am to CatfishJohn
Difference is that professional leagues have collective bargaining. The artificial caps on salaries are agreed to by players unions.
This proposed act has no input from the players. Players simply get what they are told. But, coaches have no limits. That is anti- American. Providing rights and privileges to some but not others is a step backward.
This proposed act has no input from the players. Players simply get what they are told. But, coaches have no limits. That is anti- American. Providing rights and privileges to some but not others is a step backward.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:57 am to KwoodTiger
quote:
Call the House to vote before YE so Trinidad can be ineligible.
You do realize this isn’t going to effect 2026 rosters right?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:01 am to GeauxLaneTrain
I think what some people are thinking is that this bill gives power back to the NCAA to enforce its bylaws is the way I understand it.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:02 am to NewBeginnings
Well maybe a "step backwards" is what we need. Lately all the "progress" we make is absolutely shite compared to the way things were before.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 10:03 am
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:19 am to KwoodTiger
I read early on this would stop any new lawsuits filed for five for five, but anybody already granted an injunction, like Trinidad would not be affected. There has been a lot of amendments filed so I’m not sure if that’s still the case with the final form of the senate bill or what form the house bill will be if passed.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:24 am to mike4lsu
quote:
It should be one transfer for everyone and another one for those that have graduated and have an year of eligibility.
My understanding is that in addition to one time free transfers it does leave graduate transfers in effect unless that was changed by an amendment.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:44 am to KwoodTiger
quote:Coaches - Make as much as you want
Senate passes PCSA this evening
Schools - Make as much as you want
NCAA - Make as much as you want
Players - OH MY GOD, THE PLAYERS CAN'T MAKE THAT MUCH MONEY, WE MUST STOP THIS IMMEDIATELY!!!
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:55 am to shel311
So you didn’t read anything?

Popular
Back to top


0









