Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:450
Registered on:2/1/2023
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
So….should society take steps backwards such as 7-day work weeks, no holidays, and if you miss work for illness then you’re fired.
The NCAA used the amateur label as a cover for getting rich off of the labor of young adults. The Supreme Court unanimously called them out for it 9-0. The “chaos” that people complain about is free market system. Instead of trying to use Congress to legitimize the NCAA’s efforts to control student athletes, they should collectively bargain. It works in other sports leagues. When tv revenue pushed profits into the stratosphere, college sports became a pro business. It needs to run like one.
Difference is that professional leagues have collective bargaining. The artificial caps on salaries are agreed to by players unions.
This proposed act has no input from the players. Players simply get what they are told. But, coaches have no limits. That is anti- American. Providing rights and privileges to some but not others is a step backward.
I am against this based on the last minute resolution they changed. The bill capped coaches salaries at $5 million. They changed that at the last minute to have no cap.
If they can cap players ability to earn, then coaches should be capped also. This shows that this bill is not intended to support players….it is intended to take away their rights in a free market.

Nightmare scenario

Posted by NewBeginnings on 9/18/26 at 7:48 am
On his Sirius XM morning show the other day, Rick Neuhiesel brought up a nightmare scenario and wondered if Oxford officials had any plans for it.
The scenario: LSU is up by 11 going into the 4th quarter. OM rallies by scoring a TD and going for Two. Then they hit a FG to tie at end of regulation. Then they win in OT. Students storm the field……how are they going to protect Lane? When he went back to Tennessee, they hit him with golf balls from a distance. Would some OM fans actually assault Kiffin?
Summrall coached through the playoffs and took some of Tulane’s players with him to Florida.
Lane wanted to coach in the playoffs and take some players with him. He ended up loaning offensive coaches to Ole Miss for their playoff run. During which they tried to recruit the offensive coaches to stay at Ole Miss.
I wish Ole Miss fans would be honest and say “we wouldn’t have beat Georgia without the coaches Kiffin kindly loaned”. Facts help the healing.
What matters is how the team responds to the coach. Moore is calm, unflappable, and projects quiet confidence. Players seem to love playing for him.

Idk if one style is better than the other. As long as players are ready to put it behind them, channel frustration, and execute the next play. It seems like they did that with how they played in the 2nd half.

re: It’s time for LSU to go B1G

Posted by NewBeginnings on 9/11/26 at 9:03 am to
Some pros in going to Big 10:
1. Better TV money
2. Possibly give unique recruiting edge
3. Hurt SEC after recent events
4.Dominate conference in baseball

Cons:
1. Travel would be awful for our athletes
2. Recruits that want to play close to home would possibly go elsewhere
3.Baseball would be hurt. Playing in a weaker conference with long travel.
4. Athletic travel expenses would negate extra tv money
5. Lose historic rivalries
Made at halftime indicates a “lack of institutional control”??
LSU did NOT violate any rules. They were not even a party to the court case last week. They have never rostered a player who signed an NFL contract. They kept a space open in case the Federal court rules two specific players eligible.
Steve Spurrier said humorous digs toward other conference schools his whole career. Did Florida lack institutional control over him? If Lane’s halftime comment results in any punishment, then it’s clear that this whole thing was personal agenda driven. I think LSU’s lawyers will have a field day in countering this if the SEC proceeds. Does Sankey really want to testify again and look foolish a second time trying to defend illogical decisions.
Suspended for making a sarcastic comment in the moment.
Is this the same SEC that had Spurrier making funny jabs at opposing schools regularly.
I think it’s silly but, the players seemed to enjoy it. That’s what matters.
It would have been funny if Golding would have kept it for OM. But, he said in an article that he cut that stuff out bc he felt they were winning “in spite of” distractions like that when Kiffin was there.
Batted balls was my biggest concern. I think drops is an easy fix. Having a smaller frame QB throwing through predictable tight windows is not an easy fix.

I’m super excited. This just a concern w 4 batted balls last night.
This is why I laughed when it was reported this week that Michigan may refuse to schedule LSU in the future. Michigan claiming the moral high ground over any program is peak being unaware.

Two thumbs up to ESPN

Posted by NewBeginnings on 9/6/26 at 9:08 am
I really enjoyed not having the bottom line during the games. The update in the right corner 2x an hour is perfect.
It felt like a call back to late 90’s football.
It is an apples to apples comparison. Bama didn’t play Bedihko when the court no longer said he was eligible.
Kiffin has said that LSU will follow court orders. They haven’t played a player who was ineligible or done anything wrong. They haven’t played a player who was ruled ineligible. All these players are considered eligible by a court order (same as Pavia and Chambliss). If the LA Supreme Court or the Federal case changes their eligibility, then LSU will not play them.

To say LSU has done something nefarious is silly. The precedent has been set by Vandy, Bama, Ole Miss, and other schools are rostering 2022 players who tried to go pro.
Problem with this is that it has not been applied to all sports. Basketball especially. That is where LSU is in the clear.
They are allowing basketball players to compete in g league and come back.

re: SEC punishment

Posted by NewBeginnings on 9/4/26 at 7:52 am to
Monken has retracted that first statement that he made.

Kicking LSU out of SEC….

Posted by NewBeginnings on 9/2/26 at 5:39 pm
Is such a sensationalist talking point, but for fun let’s think about this.
1. LSU has always acted within the rules regarding these 5 for 5 athletes.
2. If the courts rule against the athletes tomorrow or in the future, LSU has always said they will willingly comply.

So, if the SEC attempts to kick out LSU based on following court rulings then they will have a case to sue the SEC.
And if for somehow it works out that LSU is successfully booted from the conference, it’s not like they are going to the SunBelt. The Big 10 would scoop up LSU in a heartbeat. That would give them a powerful brand in the South. The Big 10 paid their members 76 million each this past year ( SEC paid 72 million). Then tv contracts will be renegotiated soon- will the SEC get dinged in tv contracts for replacing LSU with the likes of Fl State, Clemson, or North Carolina? How much more will the Big 10 make by adding a brand like LSU….I suspect a lot.
In no way would I condone the behavior that Lane did and Vanity Fair wrote about. I believe it’s accurate reporting. It’s def been talked about on the SEC rant many times.

At the same time, he was OC at Alabama ten years ago. People grow and change a lot in ten years. The time that he was at OM, there were not stories like this. Could it have been hidden? Sure. But, he has reconciled with his wife and connected with his adult (son is nearly an adult) kids. If he was chasing Sorority girls in Oxford, I think that info would work its way to his daughter (involved in OM sorority). I don’t think they would talk about how they’ve grown closer if his daughter suspected or knew he was sleeping with girls she rushed with.
I think that is a past chapter of his life that by all accounts his family has reconciled with. If they have moved on, then it should be a dead issue.
If reports come out that he was doing the same behavior at OM and currently at LSU, I would not want him as my coach.
I think he is one of the rare individuals who was blessed physically to play a sport and did it bc it was expected. I don’t think he loves the game, the grind, competition, or being part of a team. Loves the paycheck but that’s it.
LSU is not fighting other SEC institutions. There are other schools trying to get players eligible and doing the same thing.
Lane and LSU are being scapegoated like they are the only one bc Lane/LSU get clicks.
This will give them standing. The SEC operates under the purview of the NCAA. It is spitting in all of these judges faces for the NCAA to lose in court and act like SEC is fully independent.
It would be like a court order against Toyota motor company and them trying to say Lexus doesn’t have to follow that court order.