- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scott Woodward wants NOTHING to do with NIL
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:38 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:38 pm to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
TAF isn't giving out NIL deals. It's illegal
TAF is competing for the same dollar that these NIL deals are competing for.
1
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:42 pm to panzer
Our poor alumni base just cant compete
When a shady trial lawyer is your NIL hero you are in trouble
When a shady trial lawyer is your NIL hero you are in trouble
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:47 pm to panzer
Time to get rid of Wood
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:51 pm to ffishstik
quote:
shady shite that A&M and some other schools are pulling. I still feel like this is going to blow up in their faces
It won't. There are literally no rules. None.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:52 pm to panzer
quote:Yep, I'm sure the guy who just spent $17M to fire his head football coach and another $100M+ to hire Kelly and his staff of thousands doesn't care about something that will give LSU a competitive advantage.
Scott Woodward wants NOTHING to do with NIL
The premise is so stupid as to defy belief.
To the extent there are problems, they exist because of state NIL legislation and a pool of available money that is much smaller than our nearest competitors.
Woodward has no control over the latter but he can try to do something about the former.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:54 pm to OKtiger
quote:
It really does feel like the 1990s.. we’re hemorrhaging in-state talent because we dished out 20 mil for Coach O to have sex in Destin
Did you stop paying attention in early December? There have been some great moves lately.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:55 pm to deaux
quote:
OP is a moron
Well he is wrong for sure. According to NCAA guidelines NIL money should not be paid to players until they actually play. It is not supposed to be used as a recruiting tool. Coaches cannot offer NIL as part of recruitment.
State Laws also get involved with the payout of NIL but I am sure it varies from state to state.
This post was edited on 2/2/22 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 2/2/22 at 12:55 pm to panzer
Why would government hacks getting paid millions give a shite?
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:01 pm to Ice Cold
quote:What exactly is the state NIL legislation that is hampering us?
To the extent there are problems, they exist because of state NIL legislation
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:02 pm to moneyg
They don't get it. Don't even start the conversation.
Most don't even realize how it has been done for years, much less what they need to do now.
LSU is not competing with these school's financially. Profit margin? Yes
Budget? Hell no
We have geographical/political advantages, and we must depend on some loyalty in those regards.
Personally, I'm not interested in the free market/highest bidder without loyalties
I will move on, as I have in other interests
Most don't even realize how it has been done for years, much less what they need to do now.
LSU is not competing with these school's financially. Profit margin? Yes
Budget? Hell no
We have geographical/political advantages, and we must depend on some loyalty in those regards.
Personally, I'm not interested in the free market/highest bidder without loyalties
I will move on, as I have in other interests
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:08 pm to Chicken
quote:IIRC, it prevents LSU from brokering the deals. They must be done independently of the university. I'm not familiar with the details.
What exactly is the state NIL legislation that is hampering us?
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:10 pm to wahoocs
quote:
We have geographical/political advantages, and we must depend on some loyalty in those regards.
Personally, I'm not interested in the free market/highest bidder without loyalties
Can you expand on this?
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:10 pm to TheFlyingTiger
quote:
this is true he's betting on bureaucracy winning out and putting caps and regs on this NIL free for all...
Which I'm all for. I guess we'll see
Yay, someone on record wanting government bureaucracy to intervene and rescue.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:15 pm to Chalkywhite84
Not a chance
If you know me, in person
If you know me, in person
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:21 pm to Geauxldilocks
quote:
Yay, someone on record wanting government bureaucracy to intervene and rescue.
Did not say government. Do not want.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:22 pm to panzer
He better figure it out or he won’t be the AD for long. As football goes, so does his job. That’s facts.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:26 pm to panzer
I think you are bitching and complaining about things that NCAA is going to be forced to correct. They literally gave SMU the death penalty over something that is now approved. I think they are going to have to start looking at how they can limit compensation to athletes per year to keep parody in the leagues. Like an athlete is limited to $100k in NIL deals annually. It is much more likely that they can get that to work legally than they could stop people from using their NIL in general to make any money.
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:30 pm to Cosmo
quote:
When a shady trial lawyer is your NIL hero you are in trouble
He's just the front man for the collective
The OP has no clue what he's talking about
Do we have the money to compete with the Texas schools? no
Everyone else? yes
Why would you offer a 3* TE and a good RB(the least important position on the field where you are deep at) more money than they are worth?)
I mean we offered Matthews hundreds of thousands of dollars
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:46 pm to wahoocs
quote:
Not a chance
If you know me, in person
How would it hurt to expand on it?
Posted on 2/2/22 at 1:48 pm to Ice Cold
quote:
Yep, I'm sure the guy who just spent $17M to fire his head football coach and another $100M+ to hire Kelly and his staff of thousands doesn't care about something that will give LSU a competitive advantage.
The premise is so stupid as to defy belief.
To the extent there are problems, they exist because of state NIL legislation and a pool of available money that is much smaller than our nearest competitors.
Put differently, Woodward just spent $117M for a coach of a sport that we can’t hope to compete in due to inherent and maybe unfixable structural limitations.
That does not seem smart.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News