Stuckinthe90s

This would be very very bad.

Bad scenarios:
1. Government owns decision making powers which would at best result in poor management, inefficiency, and bureaucracy. But very likely would be used for corruption, politicians forcing family owned consultants and vendors in order to enrich themselves.

2. Budgets would be dependent on the those companies which means a recession in tech industry would magnify the affect on IRS collections.

3. Businesses that do poorly over time would so greatly affect IRS collections that it would most likely result in protections for those companies which means tech to big to fail. Which would ultimately start killing startups and new companies from competing, which would diminish our tech competitive advantage.

4. If there is corruption or fraud at that company there would be a de-incentive for the government to investigate and prosecute.

Now maybe you could say that the U.S. could start a sovereign wealth fund and invest in some of these companies, but it should be limited to 10-20% effectively restricting how much the government could influence a company. Even still, I think a U.S. sovereign wealth fund should be banned from individual company investments.

Well he is probably top candidate to be trusted with the secret bbq sauce.

Edit: for real I think he will take over a lot of ensuring people execute Kiffin vision. But I think he is really looking for another coaching job, so maybe next time Tulane is open.

I am not for federalizing elections, and I am not for a national popular vote determining president. But I don’t thing those two necessarily should be connected like goofy Harry caray states.

The truth is that each state votes in their own elections for president and their senators and at a more local level their representatives in the house. Those state and local elections should be run by the stars not by the federal government.HOWEVER there is enough impact to citizens of all the other states that there should be agreed upon rules that that each election must comply with. Such rules could be
1. Requirement of ID
2. Validation of Citizenship status
3. Validation of right to vote in a particular race
4. Validation that there are no other votes cast by that same person
5. Reasonable controls to validate mail in votes are not fraudulent
6. Background checks on all poll workers
7. Immutable voting records and Chain of custody requirements.
8. Deadline for receiving votes to happen BEFORE votes tally’s are reported


These are just some ideas, but I think it’s paramount that people have trust in the integrity of their elections, otherwise we do not have a democratic republic

Actually bitcoin is one of the worst ways possible to make a transaction secretly.

We have done pretty well when our WR room is the best. But then again we had some years that didn’t live up to expectations either like 2013 when we easily had the best WRs in the nation.

I think for consistency sacks, Oline and Dline.

I am interested in the pardon process, I always thought I pardon could not be handed down until a charge had been filed, I assume I am wrong about that since the autopen dished out pardons for any and all wrong doing spanning over basically a decade for hunter.

I think he will start straightening up after the leaks Ole Miss is giving him turn out to be false. They already were fake when it came to CWJ staying with ole Miss, then the same for the RB coach, then to CWJ going to the NFL and now from the tampering rumors. Eventually you realize you are being used as a mouth piece for propaganda.

Hell yes 150 for 10 years

Dude I don’t think anyone understands a word of what you said. But to one of the more coherent points was that underwood is a now from the majority of our fans - good thing fans don’t make roster decisions.

For misspelled corch