Stuckinthe90s

I think the real comparison that needs to be made is against ‘18 Burrow. Currently, same is comparing quite nicely to that. One thing people didn’t take into account when he wasn’t meeting their ridiculously high expectations, Leavitt didn’t get much spring or summer camp work with his injury. I think he could have an absolute monster jump going into next year.

quote:

---

Should companies be forced to keep servers running for a game that no one plays? Sucks for you if you bought the game but you can't keep paying thousands of dollars a month to run a server for 10 people who bought a game 5 years ago.

---

No, but when companies purchase software from other companies like this they require the source code to go into escrow incase that company can no longer fulfill their perpetual license agreements by either cost or bankruptcy.

It would not be hard for companies to release the source code when they shut down servers or sell a license to the code to allow other companies to host servers.

quote:

---

Leavitt lead his team to the playoffs already he shouldn't be learning how to play the QB position still. I think it's more he just don't know any of his players and trying to get used to them

---

Not trying to pick on you but this is exactly how we felt about Jayden Daniels his first year. In fact, everyone was saying how he regressed each year since his amazing freshman year at ASU. In fact, the parallels are a little eerie.

Chicken already said that Sankey is doing other schools bidding, there are schools that truly want LSU out and it’s more than just Ole Miss. I assume that Tennessee and Georgia also. After that IDK.

Idk I think he will have plenty of pressure, a schedule that Kelly would have had a losing record with. He could legit go 8-4, it’s pretty brutal, only good part is that most of the tough ones are at home.

Idk but I’m still pissed about the Peterson interception 18 years later

This would be very very bad.

Bad scenarios:
1. Government owns decision making powers which would at best result in poor management, inefficiency, and bureaucracy. But very likely would be used for corruption, politicians forcing family owned consultants and vendors in order to enrich themselves.

2. Budgets would be dependent on the those companies which means a recession in tech industry would magnify the affect on IRS collections.

3. Businesses that do poorly over time would so greatly affect IRS collections that it would most likely result in protections for those companies which means tech to big to fail. Which would ultimately start killing startups and new companies from competing, which would diminish our tech competitive advantage.

4. If there is corruption or fraud at that company there would be a de-incentive for the government to investigate and prosecute.

Now maybe you could say that the U.S. could start a sovereign wealth fund and invest in some of these companies, but it should be limited to 10-20% effectively restricting how much the government could influence a company. Even still, I think a U.S. sovereign wealth fund should be banned from individual company investments.

Well he is probably top candidate to be trusted with the secret bbq sauce.

Edit: for real I think he will take over a lot of ensuring people execute Kiffin vision. But I think he is really looking for another coaching job, so maybe next time Tulane is open.

I am not for federalizing elections, and I am not for a national popular vote determining president. But I don’t thing those two necessarily should be connected like goofy Harry caray states.

The truth is that each state votes in their own elections for president and their senators and at a more local level their representatives in the house. Those state and local elections should be run by the stars not by the federal government.HOWEVER there is enough impact to citizens of all the other states that there should be agreed upon rules that that each election must comply with. Such rules could be
1. Requirement of ID
2. Validation of Citizenship status
3. Validation of right to vote in a particular race
4. Validation that there are no other votes cast by that same person
5. Reasonable controls to validate mail in votes are not fraudulent
6. Background checks on all poll workers
7. Immutable voting records and Chain of custody requirements.
8. Deadline for receiving votes to happen BEFORE votes tally’s are reported


These are just some ideas, but I think it’s paramount that people have trust in the integrity of their elections, otherwise we do not have a democratic republic

Actually bitcoin is one of the worst ways possible to make a transaction secretly.