- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rookie minicamp is ok but a preseason camp is not?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:07 pm
Cole Hutson has been practicing with Texas after getting professional instruction and presumably paid to play by an NFL team. Per Google their beat writers say he’s still eligible and with the team.
Has a TRO.
Absolutely no one seems to be care.
Has Sark been accused of being a rogue program?
Has mcafee interviewed sark?
Has a TRO.
Absolutely no one seems to be care.
Has Sark been accused of being a rogue program?
Has mcafee interviewed sark?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:09 pm to Adam Banks
Rules for thee but not for me!
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:10 pm to Adam Banks
They clearly wrote the rule at the B10 level to not go after that UCLA player and the SEC rule was written specifically in a way to not go after the Texas player
It's a Lane Kiffin rule, flat out
It's a Lane Kiffin rule, flat out
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:11 pm to Adam Banks
I don’t know if players sign contracts for mini camp and compensation.
I’m wondering if he had any travel or hotel paid by the Cowboys.
Would think if that’s the case he would at least get a suspension.
I’m wondering if he had any travel or hotel paid by the Cowboys.
Would think if that’s the case he would at least get a suspension.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:13 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Has Sark been accused of being a rogue program?
They are having quite a few problems in Austin, but yeah the double standard for Hutson is confusing to me
All of these 5 for 5 players signed contracts & got paid to play in college last year.
Yet he is still eligible because he didn’t “sign an NFL contract” while some other guys did
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:17 pm to JimTiger72
He didn't withdraw from the draft. Regardless of whether he signed a contract or not he shouldn't be eligible. According to their statement
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:18 pm to JayVegas702
Seniors had no reason to enter/withdraw from the draft before the “5 for 5” was approved
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:23 pm to Adam Banks
According to Hester, camp invites don't sign an NFL contract. They sign a waiver that states that the team will cover medical costs if they are injured during the minicamp.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:24 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
They also get paid expenses meals etc. as well as NFL instruction.
Absolutely zero reason he should be clear but not the others.
This will be brought up in court.
Can’t say one is ok but the others not.
Absolutely zero reason he should be clear but not the others.
This will be brought up in court.
Can’t say one is ok but the others not.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:28 pm to JimTiger72
Exactly...but they're not making any distinction for 5 for 5 players. That rule makes sense if someone left college early, but these guys didn't. He should be eligible but so should any of these guys that only went to the draft because they had no choice.
But by the letter of the law according to sec then they are all ineligible
But by the letter of the law according to sec then they are all ineligible
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:31 pm to Adam Banks
Rookie mini camp is a 3 day try out. Ur not apart of no team, no contracts, no practices, rookie mini camp is basically like a walk on trying to make it on lsu team but he was cut.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:32 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
They also get paid expenses meals etc. as well as NFL instruction.
Absolutely zero reason he should be clear but not the others.
This will be brought up in court.
Can’t say one is ok but the others not.
Yall are being dumb on purpose. Its all about where the hard line is drawn and it seems like that line is drawn at signing an NFL contract. A rookie minicamp waiver is not a contract.
Yall are essentially taking the stance that "a crime is a crime" so someone Jay walking should get the same treatment as a murderer. I get that this example is hyperbolic but the point being that there are levels to things and signing and official NFL contract seems to be the line in the sand.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:33 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
Camp invite in the spring is way different from suiting up and playing in NFL preseason games and getting paid
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:34 pm to Tiger2tiga
And?
He got benefits housing food etc from the NFL and was cut.
These guys got an EXTREMELY minimal signing bonus and were cut.
All of them left college.
None were drafted.
He got benefits housing food etc from the NFL and was cut.
These guys got an EXTREMELY minimal signing bonus and were cut.
All of them left college.
None were drafted.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:36 pm to Adam Banks
Its dumb because the only reason he is allowed back is because he wasn't good enough to make a preseason roster. That's it.
The other guys were slightly better/valued, thus made a preseason roster, but not good enough to make the final 53.
The "morality" of it all is exactly the same, but they are just mad that LSU was getting slightly more valued players.
The other guys were slightly better/valued, thus made a preseason roster, but not good enough to make the final 53.
The "morality" of it all is exactly the same, but they are just mad that LSU was getting slightly more valued players.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:36 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
And?
He got benefits housing food etc from the NFL and was cut.
These guys got an EXTREMELY minimal signing bonus and were cut.
All of them left college.
None were drafted.
Again your just ignoring the answers to your issues because you don't like the answer.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:37 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
Yall are being dumb on purpose. It’s all about where the hard line is drawn and it seems like that line is drawn at signing an NFL contract. A rookie minicamp waiver is not a contract.
Both of which make a player ineligible in the eyes of the NCAA.
That’s why all of them required going to court.
All of them have received compensation from the NFL
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:37 pm to dallastiger55
quote:
Camp invite in the spring is way different from suiting up and playing in NFL preseason games and getting paid
Neither Harris nor Wright played in a preseason game.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:38 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
Again your just ignoring the answers to your issues because you don't like the answer.
No.
You just seem to think you can be a little pregnant.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:38 pm to Adam Banks
The difference is Sark did it quietly, no one would've ever known if you didn't bring the information to the board.
Popular
Back to top

10






