
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Reminder - Ken Paxton was acquitted of 16 impeachment charges
Posted on 10/13/26 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 10/13/26 at 8:56 pm
In perhaps the biggest joke of a trial in Texas history.
Rusty Hardin and his little yappy boss woman sidekick lawyer were made to look like literal morons in the court of law.
I still go back in time on YouTube and watch the key witness Jeff Mateer absolutely melt into a puddle on the stand
So when a “God created trans kids” and “Our border should be a front porch” Talarico supporter mentions corruption on here just roll your eyes and laugh at their dumb arse
Rusty Hardin and his little yappy boss woman sidekick lawyer were made to look like literal morons in the court of law.
I still go back in time on YouTube and watch the key witness Jeff Mateer absolutely melt into a puddle on the stand
So when a “God created trans kids” and “Our border should be a front porch” Talarico supporter mentions corruption on here just roll your eyes and laugh at their dumb arse
Posted on 10/13/26 at 8:58 pm to texag7
Why not tell them while the fix was in in the trial,
since the jury for the trial is the Texas Senate where Republicans have a 17 to 14 advantage
there is never any chance that paxton was going to be convicted of anything it was a sham
it was fixed from the start
since the jury for the trial is the Texas Senate where Republicans have a 17 to 14 advantage
there is never any chance that paxton was going to be convicted of anything it was a sham
it was fixed from the start
Posted on 10/13/26 at 8:59 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
it was a sham
It was a sham because they had zero evidence.
Claiming Nate Paul paid for renovations then pictures were shown proving no renovations occurred. That shite was fricking hilarious
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:00 pm to OWLFAN86
So you just acknowledged it was a waste of time and money?
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:02 pm to texag7
All you need to know about Paxton is he's not totally clean and without some warts but his biggest sin was taking down George P Bush.....that's not gonna fly with the Texas neocons.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:02 pm to OWLFAN86
Even you should be able to admit their case was flimsy. Dade Phallus proved why RINOs suck.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:03 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
Why not tell them while the fix was in in the trial, since the jury for the trial is the Texas Senate where Republicans have a 17 to 14 advantage there is never any chance that paxton was going to be convicted of anything it was a sham it was fixed from the start
Damn. Show us on a doll where Paxton touched you Owl….
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:03 pm to texag7
Reminder, he had to pay back hundreds of thousands because he was guilty and made a deal.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:04 pm to texag7
No matter what, Paxton CANNOT LOSE!
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:08 pm to DeBoar
quote:Where have I ever wasn't a waste of time and money ?
So you just acknowledged it was a waste of time and money?
It was pure political theater just like the Democrats walking out earlier this year Over the congressional redistricting
I kept trying to tell you all that y'all were so convinced that these Democrats are going to be hunted down and arrested,
and I told you all nothing was going to happen, and look what happened: nothing
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:08 pm to Warboo
quote:
Damn. Show us on a doll where Paxton touched you Owl….
What if we show you where a Paxton donor touched underage kids, and Paxton covered for him l. Because he’s walking free. Didn’t even have to register as a sex offender:
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:28 pm to OWLFAN86
What are we arguing about at this point. The time for this bullshite was BEFORE the damned primary.
You frickin Susie come laters are the worst pimple on the arse of the right.
Once again, the time for bitching about the candidates comes in primary season. If your candidate lost, get behind better candidates and argue for them THEN.
You frickin Susie come laters are the worst pimple on the arse of the right.
Once again, the time for bitching about the candidates comes in primary season. If your candidate lost, get behind better candidates and argue for them THEN.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:29 pm to 10thyrsr
quote:I was saying it before the primary; I've been on this platform saying EXACTLY this
You frickin Susie come laters are the worst pimple on the arse of the right.
For about a year
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:30 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
I was saying it before the primary; I've been on this platform saying EXACTLY this
For about a year
And you STILL lost! Texans chose Paxton. You are on here trying to make wine out of sour grapes. Get over it and stop trying to sabotage the will of the people.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:32 pm to OWLFAN86
Was it fixed like the 2020 Presidential election?
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:32 pm to texag7
Owlfan who looks like Adam Richman irl loves trooning kids and freako
All cause hes a bushtard
All cause hes a bushtard
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:33 pm to OWLFAN86
Not to mention, at NO moment has the election of Paxton in the primary given you pause to think "maybe I might be wrong". Instead, you continue to bleed all over the board for some reason instead of taking a moment for introspection.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:35 pm to 10thyrsr
Why does it bother you that I'm so confident in my opinion?
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:37 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
there is never any chance that paxton was going to be convicted of anything it was a sham
Well it's a political process and not judicial. I have a lot less interest in a political process.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:38 pm to AGGIES
quote:
What if we show you where a Paxton donor touched underage kids, and Paxton covered for him l. Because he’s walking free. Didn’t even have to register as a sex offender:
Try looking into the case rather than just regurgitating campaign commercials.
Paxton’s office charged him and prosecuted him. A jury found there was not sufficient evidence to convict.
They wanted to retry the case but the victim refused to participate again.
So the prosecutor (not Paxton) offered a plea bargain to obtain a conviction without the assistance of the victim. The judge (not Paxton) accepted the plea and sentenced the guilty party.

Popular
Back to top

10










