- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
10thyrsr
| Favorite team: | Texas A&M  |
| Location: | Texas |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Scientist |
| Number of Posts: | 997 |
| Registered on: | 10/22/2020 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
The algorithm only delivers what you want to see. So if you are seeing that, it is because it has figured out that is the context in which you want to see that in.
It is more a reflection of you than the common person when you post what you are seeing it accompanied with.
It is more a reflection of you than the common person when you post what you are seeing it accompanied with.
0
quote:
We just wait for news of his latest bat shite crazy behavior.
Who provides that news? Who pushes his comments to the top of twitter? There is a reason they want you to listen to the most outrageous claims of interviews rather than the whole interview that provides context.
Can you state anything he said in the full interview? Probably not. Tucker isn't designed to be consumed with a 10 second sound byte and they know it.
It is the reason politicians have been able to screw us all. THEY know how to work the sound byte and say nothing at all
Errerrerrwere, and I don't play nicely with each other, although we DO share some common ground.
If you stopped listening, then you didn't want to hear what he was saying. Why do you think you didn't want to hear that?
quote:
fact that Tucker said this a month ago is supposed to change everything? You are a total clown. The Chavez-Maduro regime has been an enemy of the United States for 20 years now
Another example. 1. I didn't say that 2. You can be an enemy of the US and be socially conservative.
quote:
Tucker Carlson has truly disgraced himself. What a POS.
Still, after a large amount of discussion, we still get posts like these responding to the OP without evaluating the full thread and commenting on the continued conversation.
People feel obliged to comment for some reason. This isn't a YouTube comment, this is a thread, where you read the entire discussion and then comment. I'm not singling this poster out, but I think this is a problem. Are they farming for the dopamine hit of an upvoter? What is their motivation to post?
re: Tucker unhappy with Maduro’s ouster. Says he is most socially conservative leader in SA
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/3/26 at 9:59 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
The chimps on this board are getting more and more stupid. Who is leaving the doors unlocked?
No critical thinking AT ALL! Everyone just wants to jump on the wagon with their emotions and let them bleed all over the place without taking 10 seconds to evaluate the twitter post and provide their own unique take. Algorithms have fricked us.
He isn't an idiot. He was speaking about South America. Some people see "Conservative" in a post and go nuts defending it because they think it reflects on right wing Americans.
re: Tucker unhappy with Maduro’s ouster. Says he is most socially conservative leader in SA
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/3/26 at 9:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Dictators restricting freedoms go hand in hand. Trying to spin it as "social conservatism" is a bad look. Always.
It isn't spin. Whether dictator or not, it was the most socially conservative nation in SA.
re: Tucker unhappy with Maduro’s ouster. Says he is most socially conservative leader in SA
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/3/26 at 9:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If you think the argument is that he's factually incorrect, you've lost the plot
If I am not evaluating something on facts, what am I evaluating it on? Emotions?
re: Tucker unhappy with Maduro’s ouster. Says he is most socially conservative leader in SA
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/3/26 at 9:37 pm to shutterspeed
quote:
Have to wonder, at this point, who Tucker's audience is now. He was huge. Certainly can't be as large as for his former persona.
Surely you are correct. He is a great thinker and speaker. His words are carefully chosen and you have to understand the context and situation. Sound bites taken from his interviews are guaranteed to trigger emotion without listening to the full interview.
He is not built for 20 second clips. It is a deep dive. I know many reactionaries disagree, but they always will as long as twitter and other social media continues to drive dopamine rewards on short clips.
re: Tucker unhappy with Maduro’s ouster. Says he is most socially conservative leader in SA
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/3/26 at 9:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
Because it is the quote in his statement that you were piling on to. Is he wrong?
re: Tucker unhappy with Maduro’s ouster. Says he is most socially conservative leader in SA
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/3/26 at 9:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
Can you name a more socially conservative nation in SA? You didn't even respond to the call for that. What nation is more socially conservative?
re: Tucker unhappy with Maduro’s ouster. Says he is most socially conservative leader in SA
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/3/26 at 9:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He jumped the shark a long time ago.
You are using this opportunity to pile on because you dislike him instead of evaluating the words and context of what he said. This is contrary to your actions that you would normally do when the target is someone who agrees with your position. This is exactly why the board calls you out.
You don't use your analytical power equally.
Who was more socially conservative than Venezuela in South America then? If you have a problem with his comment, you should probably back it up with responses.
Don't fall for click bait titles when emotions are amplified. Investigate and see if what he said was correct. Answer the question above.
If you can't provide an answer and you are angry, maybe you have a problem with the facts.
Don't fall for click bait titles when emotions are amplified. Investigate and see if what he said was correct. Answer the question above.
If you can't provide an answer and you are angry, maybe you have a problem with the facts.
Guys, not every enemy has to be a globalist. You ever play RISK? There can be multiple bad guys with their own motives. You don't need to frame everything in the context of America vs the Globalists. Most of us like football, we have our rivals (the Globalists) that we want to beat all the time, but you also have to win 11 other games against other opponents, and they aren't all supporting your rival.
re: The Globalists Have Taken A Big Hit Over the Past 24 Hours.....
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/3/26 at 8:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Russia/China/Iran are the triumvirate opposing globalism. Venezuela was one of their proxies.
You are correct. Most of the push for globalism comes from the EU in their effort to collect power they don't control under the guise of being environmentally and morally superior to other more powerful entities. They attempt to guilt those powers into abdicating control of their power to more "responsible" authority who would handle it better. It is their only play.
Other powerful nations, as you mentioned, reject this idea, and that is why we have the conflict. Those other powerful nations have their own motives that don't include protecting America as the mightiest nation.
So, we can celebrate this event as a win that reinforces US power and ability, sticks it in the eye of ALL above, and gives some control back to the actual people of Venezuela.
quote:
The most prominent "percentage-based" method for determining if something is a psyop that I've found circulating online (particularly in conspiracy and alternative media communities) is the NCI Engineered Reality Scoring System.
What It Is
Developed or promoted by the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) or associated figures (sometimes linked to discussions around Chase Hughes, a behavioral expert who trains operatives and appeared on podcasts like Shawn Ryan's to discuss manipulation detection).
It's a scoring checklist (often 20 points or similar) where you evaluate an event, narrative, or story based on specific indicators of psychological manipulation (e.g., sudden narrative shifts, emotional triggers, timing convenience, media coordination, group behavior changes, etc.).
Each matching indicator adds points, resulting in a total score that translates to a percentage likelihood or probability that the event is "engineered reality" (i.e., a psyop, staged manipulation, or disinformation campaign).
How It Works (Typical Structure)
Users go through a list of yes/no or weighted questions like:
Does the story provoke intense fear/outrage without verifiable evidence?
Is there rapid, unified media amplification?
Suspicious timing (e.g., distracts from another scandal)?
Inconsistencies in details or witness accounts?
Sudden shifts in public opinion or behavior?
Higher scores mean higher "engineered" probability, often categorized like:
Low score: Organic event.
Medium: Possible influence.
High (e.g., 70%+): Likely psyop.
It's shared as a tool for "mathematical precision" in spotting propaganda, with charts or memes showing the scoring rubric.
NCI Reality Scoring
re: CNN Finally Covers Minnesota Day Care Fraud…
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/2/26 at 10:08 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
This is what you quoted. Exactly.
Go look at X.
This was pushed by everyone including the owner of X, the VP And the Presidents son.
And then you sycophants followed.
Congrats?
Bud, by that definition, everything is a psyop. You have to apply ALL THE RULES and rank it on a percentage. Greater than 70 percent is probably a psyop. Less than 40 is probably not. You have to use the ENTIRE metric to determine a psyop. Give me your math on the other rules.
re: CNN Finally Covers Minnesota Day Care Fraud…
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/2/26 at 9:53 pm to Errerrerrwere
No MEDIA coordination.
re: CNN Finally Covers Minnesota Day Care Fraud…
Posted by 10thyrsr on 1/2/26 at 9:51 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
quote:
Amazing how quickly MAGA folks revert to trusting the government.
Ain't it though?
Can you blame them? The government is made up of people who know how to work the people. Your anger and derision is misdirected if you are blaming constituents for not being experts in government workings when the politicians have made a career of obfuscation and distraction. The constituents are busy taking care of everything going on in their life, and have become too reliant on the media/internet to provide them relevant and truthful information.
Popular
28
