0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/1/26 at 10:38 pm to Chicken
Experience?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 11:37 pm to LSUAlum2001
Hey baw, to me it's fairly simple...
NCAA had their chance for YEARS. NCAA instead fought in court.
I understand. players are in the right.
NCAA had their chance for YEARS. NCAA instead fought in court.
I understand. players are in the right.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 3:09 am to Chicken
Sure, why not?
They are all professional athletes now.
Minor league football.
They are all professional athletes now.
Minor league football.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:25 am to Chicken
Playing them just mot worth the risk of potential forfeits and suspensions. Could derail a successful season.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:54 am to Chicken
NO. IMO that move will officially be - the death of collegiate football.
So how long before we see collegiate football players holding out for more NIL money? And when does LSU sell the university to pay for high dollar football recruits?
What a mess.
So how long before we see collegiate football players holding out for more NIL money? And when does LSU sell the university to pay for high dollar football recruits?
What a mess.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:07 am to Athletix
quote:Or we believe college football should remain as close to college football as possible. There are several other current practices that need to be rolled back as well.
This fan base is softer than I thought it was. A little media pressure and half of yall are willing to roll over, belly exposed
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:08 am to Chicken
Perfectly fine with it as long as it’s within the rules.
Why is it even a question?
Why is it even a question?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:11 am to Chicken
If the court system said it’s OK. Then yes.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:19 am to Chicken
If this poll was made across all college football fans, it would be 95% No to 5% Yes. Those would be the results here too if it was another team leading the charge on this and not LSU.
This is not some 50/50 issue. It’s an odd fight to fight at this time of the year and there’s no way it’s not a distraction to the players and coaches.
This is not some 50/50 issue. It’s an odd fight to fight at this time of the year and there’s no way it’s not a distraction to the players and coaches.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:29 am to Chicken
I have no say in it so it doesn't matter, but I see bringing in former NFL players in put college football in the semi-pro position.
It's just another step past the NIL.
It's just another step past the NIL.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:29 am to Chicken
Eligibility is one thing but there should 100% be an age limit. 23 years old max then move on with life. If you turn 24 in December ? No playoffs for you. Needs to be a hard line. It’s America and you should be able to earn what you can wherever but there are age limits for various things in various fields. It’s the way life is. Can be a teenager forever. And winning should NOT be at any cost. That’s immature
The end result may be that if you’re a student you can play because this is America Just make rules and be done with it
The end result may be that if you’re a student you can play because this is America Just make rules and be done with it
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:48 am to Chicken
I think the question is too vague. The majority of people, myself included, don’t believe players with “NFL experience” - as in played for the Cowboys for a couple of years - should be allowed to come back.
In the current situation, we’re talking about a small group of guys that were forced to go pro last year and don’t have to based on the new rule and never played a game in the NFL. I think most people Are okay with this small group but not a blanket-wide “former nfl players” being able to
“NFL experience” is vague/misleading IMO
In the current situation, we’re talking about a small group of guys that were forced to go pro last year and don’t have to based on the new rule and never played a game in the NFL. I think most people Are okay with this small group but not a blanket-wide “former nfl players” being able to
“NFL experience” is vague/misleading IMO
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 7:51 am
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:25 am to Athletix
quote:I noted no only because i couldn't vote yes on if all schools should follow the same court orders.
If you vote no, I pray your next menstrual cycle is mild.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:44 am to Chicken
Definitely not worth all the negative publicity right now. But I also think it’s very bad for college football. It’s already sliding down a very slippery slope with the semi-pro, non student athletes but this just ratchets it up several notches. Leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:46 am to Chicken
Players with remaining eligibility testing the waters should not disqualify them from returning to college IMO. I have always felt that. Just think of the poor guys we've had who declared early due to their circumstances and went undrafted or got cut.
Though ones who have been officially rostered for a single NFL regular season game should be disqualified 100%, you have to draw a hard line somewhere.
It is a Pandora's box currently and I'd rather LSU not gamble with it, or act before there is a stable framework that is consistent across all states and conferences to govern and facilitate the moves.
No for me at the moment, hopefully this is worked out before the 27 season.
Though ones who have been officially rostered for a single NFL regular season game should be disqualified 100%, you have to draw a hard line somewhere.
It is a Pandora's box currently and I'd rather LSU not gamble with it, or act before there is a stable framework that is consistent across all states and conferences to govern and facilitate the moves.
No for me at the moment, hopefully this is worked out before the 27 season.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 8:55 am
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:04 am to white beans
quote:they didn't test the waters they jumped into the water, swam laps and got out and went back to college.
Players with remaining eligibility testing the waters should not disqualify them from returning to college IMO.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:22 am to Chicken
I don’t see a problem with a first year player who gets cut/waived returning to college for a final year of eligibility. Should they really be considered a pro when they don’t actually make a team? Maybe there needs to be a revision as to what constitutes a pro player.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:36 am to JimTiger72
That's my take also, if its ruled to be legal.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 9:37 am
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:50 am to Chicken
I would of added "...if not against the rules". This would imply others can/will do it as well.
Which means we should do what we must to remain competitive within the rules. Would change the vote pattern I think.
Which means we should do what we must to remain competitive within the rules. Would change the vote pattern I think.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News