- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Poll: Are you in favor of LSU adding players with NFL experience to the roster?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:32 pm to TheArrogantCorndog
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:32 pm to TheArrogantCorndog
To me you define NFL experience as any camp participation, mini camp or preseason whether you sign contract or not - or use the NFLPA accrued model, being on team roster for 1-2 nfl regular season games as it acres as full season towards pension.
I think these guys cshould be eligible because ncaa screwed them and they weren’t any more professional than the college players; both get paid except the guys that got cut in preseason got paid less lol
Ps I voted no - juice just isn’t worth the squeeze here.
I think these guys cshould be eligible because ncaa screwed them and they weren’t any more professional than the college players; both get paid except the guys that got cut in preseason got paid less lol
Ps I voted no - juice just isn’t worth the squeeze here.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 4:33 pm
0
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:35 pm to Chicken
Woof, the poll results are more divided than I expected 
I guess the no people are staying quiet mostly?
I guess the no people are staying quiet mostly?This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:36 pm to Nitrogen
quote:
I guess the no people are staying quiet mostly?
Have you seen the SEC Rant? Not only LSU fans voting
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:38 pm to Ryan3232
quote:
Chicken, Can you add a 3rd option?
"Whatever gets the NCAA and SEC to shut the frick up"
Right!
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:38 pm to JimTiger72
Oops, didn’t know the poll was available over there as well.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:39 pm to sidewalkside
clowns from sec rant are coming here and voting against us.
it is a no brainer.
it is a no brainer.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:39 pm to Chicken
For this year, due to the NCAA dragging their feet to officialize the 5 for 5 ruling? Absolutely add them.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:44 pm to Chicken
I'm not worried about SEC repercussions. The TRO is worded to protect against the Rule of Restitution.
The preliminary injunction will last the entire season. When the season ends, the players drop the lawsuit, and the SEC cannot punish LSU retroactively.
No downside.
Blue skies, smiling' at me. Nothing' but blues skies do I see.
Bluebirds singing' a song. Nothing' but bluebirds all day long.
The preliminary injunction will last the entire season. When the season ends, the players drop the lawsuit, and the SEC cannot punish LSU retroactively.
No downside.
Blue skies, smiling' at me. Nothing' but blues skies do I see.
Bluebirds singing' a song. Nothing' but bluebirds all day long.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:47 pm to DecadePlusLurker
This is a NCAA problem. They should be taking the heat. It’s time to tell them to F off and create a new league. They are ran by idiots.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:51 pm to sidewalkside
Look, if the rulings are that you can roster them and play them with no penalties and that is ironclad and the SEC or NCAA cannot levy heavy penalties or any penalties at all then I am ok with it. If there is any chance that it will cause LSU problems with the NCAA or SEC then it's not worth it. We have great players. We have a very good roster. Talent is not an issue here. I don't want any risk taken that could backfire on us with penalties etc.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:53 pm to Athletix
quote:
This fan base is softer than I thought it was. A little media pressure and half of yall are willing to roll over, belly exposed.
To be clear, I think every single logical fan of every program is against former NFL players playing college football.
The issue here is players who have signed NFL contracts but never played. What's the difference between signing an NFL contract and signing an NIL contract?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 4:55 pm to Chicken
Anyone who makes a 53-man roster shouldn't be allowed to come back. But nobody named in the lawsuits should be in that category. I don't even know if that counts as "NFL experience."
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:01 pm to Chicken
The juice ain't worth the squeeze
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:09 pm to Chicken
Vote #25!!!!!
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:11 pm to Nitrogen
quote:
I guess the no people are staying quiet mostly?
not really
I've seen a bunch of tigers fans between here and SEC rant not exactly liking this.
It's bad overall for the sport. I get that LSU could potentially benefit in the short term, but I'm looking past my nose here.
The NCAA handled it poorly months ago and has caused this mess. NCAA is also not consistent with anything they do or their rulings.
We are also using the term "NFL experience" loosely here. As long as LSU remains compliant with whatever is ordered by the judge (who I assume has the final authority here) then whatever. I just see this as opening another can of worms with another set of players down the line.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:12 pm to Chicken
For 2022 class?
Sure
Sure
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:12 pm to Chicken
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:23 pm to Chicken
Until the rules are clear, we should welcome anyone wanting to play for us
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:27 pm to idlewatcher
What is NFL experience? Trying out in the summer is not the same as playing a regular season game… so what is it? Is this like “what is a woman?” What is the line here?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 5:30 pm to Chicken
They don’t have NFL experience. That’s the only reason the results aren’t 90/10.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News