- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Matt Leinart on '03
Posted on 10/26/15 at 7:28 pm to monsterballads
Posted on 10/26/15 at 7:28 pm to monsterballads
If you are still trying to make your case 12 years later it probably means you have no case. Leinart would have been exposed just like Mr Heisman Jason White was exposed in the championship game. Exhibit "A" is Leinart's alleged NFL "career".
This post was edited on 10/26/15 at 7:29 pm
1
Posted on 10/26/15 at 7:30 pm to TBoy@LSU
quote:So because he had a subpar pro career. Means that he wouldn't have been able to take on LSU in the title game? That's airtight logic dude.
If you are still trying to make your case 12 years later it probably means you have no case. Leinart would have been exposed just like Mr Heisman Jason White was exposed in the championship game. Exhibit "A" is Leinart's alleged NFL "career".
Posted on 10/26/15 at 7:34 pm to monsterballads
They have their right to say they had a title that year, but only LSU can claim that they played in the National Championship Game and won it. And every college player wanted to hoist the crystal football at the end of the year...not that AP trophy from the 1520s. They had a great team though.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 7:35 pm to HappyTigerDay
0 peat!
Posted on 10/26/15 at 7:41 pm to HappyTigerDay
Ask Leinhart to explain this in 2003:
OU 59 UCLA 14
USC 47 UCLA 22
OU lost to a 11 win Kansas St team
USC lost to a 6 loss California team
The right team made it when you avoid the "eye test" and look at the facts
OU 59 UCLA 14
USC 47 UCLA 22
OU lost to a 11 win Kansas St team
USC lost to a 6 loss California team
The right team made it when you avoid the "eye test" and look at the facts
Posted on 10/26/15 at 7:49 pm to Crow Pie
It's not a Damn shared title. The BCS bullshite was established as the one and only title holder and we all know who held that title.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:08 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
The 30 for 30 mentioned nothing about a split title or LSU. They just said USC won the national championship
The also stated a few times that the 03 rise bowl was the national championship game which is an outright lie. Funny how they shape that.
There is no case and how anyone can say "it's a national title" including the ones that state in record books that there was a "split". The BCS was invented to put the #1 and #2 teams together for the national championship. The polls were used as a part to determine this but they were Irrelevant other than that.
When USC didn't et their way, they cried and used their Hollywood stroke to make headlines. The AP stated after the rose bowl (before the sugar bowl was played) that they would rank USC their national champion. He AP crowing a team their number one during the BCS Era carry a no more weight than me and 4 posters sitting around and saying we crown team X our national champion. The fact that anyone outside of USC states that it is a split is laughable.
Rules are rules and in this case, they were written. Not the "oh well you have to win your conference or no mulligans" unwritten rules in BCS past. USC and the AP were but hurt and cried like a bunch of bitches because just like the documentary showed, they believed they hype and LA fabrication and no one could tell the different. pretty much said "nu uh. We are the champions " even though they did not play in the game that their school chose and voted to be apart of to decide a national champion.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:12 pm to JBeam
quote:
So because he had a subpar pro career. Means that he wouldn't have been able to take on LSU in the title game? That's airtight logic dude.
Now that's funny. What's your logic "dude" ? 50K plus posts and that's all you have? Give me your best case for why Leinart and USC would have beaten LSU in the championship game. I gave you mine, one Heisman trophy winner QB would have had no more success than another Heisman trophy winning QB that night. You can't refute that so you attack the messenger. Weak logic dude.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:34 pm to TBoy@LSU
You can take the exact scenario LSU and USC had in 2003. Put Notre Dame, Michigan, Ohio State, or some other premadonna school and USC is not recognized as anything but runner up that year.
THE Crystal Ball is not in Los Angeles.
THE Crystal Ball is not in Los Angeles.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:52 pm to Broski
quote:Auburn would have beaten them the next year as well.
nd I'm sure every LSU player on that '03 team says they would whip USC's arse...
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:55 pm to HappyTigerDay
People don't remember how good LSU's defense was in 2003. Watch the national championship game. It's disgusting. LSU sacks White all three plays of one series.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:57 pm to NC_Tigah
USC would have beaten Auburn just as they did in 2002 and 2003.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:57 pm to The Boat
quote:
People don't remember how good LSU's defense was in 2003. Watch the national championship game. It's disgusting. LSU sacks White all three plays of one series.
Hey JBeam what's your logic here dude? You think Leinart's alleged pro career was a fluke and he was really good in college?
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:59 pm to trom83
quote:
Leinart said he does know it's a shared title, but it's still a national title
No its not. It was a number 1 ranking by a sports media group. That's it.
They are darn lucky the NCAA took it easy on them and only vacated wins in 2004 and 2005.
This post was edited on 10/26/15 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 10/26/15 at 8:59 pm to HappyTigerDay
You have to remember Leinart is the guy who said "we're the better team" in a post game interview after Texas beat them in the Rose Bowl. So I wouldn't expect him to look at things impartially.
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:00 pm to HappyTigerDay
quote:
I actually do like Leinart
I don't know why you do- he has been a total arse since his college days & I see nothing in him to think he has changed. One of the biggest jerks I have ever seen or heard...
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:06 pm to Tiger in Texas
The AP title of 2003. Never gets old hearing another USC Trojan claim this. USC won their BS AP participation award because they're flashy USC. If Iowa had their same season it wouldn't have been as much big news
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:20 pm to BestStop
quote:
some other premadonna school
As in before Madonna?
Or did you mean "primadonna"?
Posted on 10/26/15 at 9:32 pm to The Boat
quote:
You have to remember Leinart is the guy who said "we're the better team" in a post game interview after Texas beat them in the Rose Bowl. So I wouldn't expect him to look at things impartially.
Yep really good logic there.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News