Started By
Message

re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation

Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:42 pm to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52191 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

If you think that’s irrelevant your either brain dead, Funyons or the LSPD.


Lacy not being part of the collision in no way absolves him of causing it. It’s literally written in both the negligent homicide and hit and run laws that physical involvement isn’t required.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6818 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

know there were reports of this at first. And while it shouldn’t have gotten to an official report, it doesn’t change the fact the she swerved to avoid someone who was braking because Lacy was speeding in the wrong lane in a no passing zone. There’s no getting around that.
. You will never .... never convince an idiot like that otherwise.
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
20826 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

Genuine question, how is a car that is going 50 mph tailgating a car that is going 28 mph?


Maybe tailgating isn't the correct word but she was obviously closing in on the suggested 100 foot gap as he was slowing down.

Her original citation was for following too close.
This post was edited on 10/8/25 at 6:35 am
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6818 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:45 pm to
But she WAS cited for what was deemed her responsibility.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21184 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:46 pm to
I commute a long way to work daily on the interstate. Many times I’ve avoided accidents by paying attention to my surroundings. People drive like maniacs. There is not a day it seems like I don’t see someone driving crazy and reckless.
Posted by DustInTheWind
Member since Sep 2016
899 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:49 pm to
She broke the law only by being forced to because of a sudden event she had to avoid in an emergency.

One person blatantly breaking the law going over 25 mph over the speed limit crossing double lines vs a lady reacting to an emergency who may have been distracted. Good luck getting a jury to buy that and have sympathy. He was done.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87991 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:49 pm to
And if you hit someone because of that reckless driving, they would more than likely be at fault and not you.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6818 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

 commute a long way to work daily on the interstate. Many times I’ve avoided accidents by paying attention to my surroundings. People drive like maniacs. There is not a day it seems like I don’t see someone driving crazy and reckless.
. Me too. My head is always on a swivel. And I surely don't assume that just because a light is green that no one is coming.

But even with that care this may not have been avoided. And that's scary.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6221 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

She broke the law only by being forced to because of a sudden event she had to avoid in an emergency.

i can respectfully disagree on her involvement. She asnt forced to do anything if she is paying attention but your 100% right about KL's actions.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
28424 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:52 pm to
Practically-speaking, for those still in the thread… Which of these do you consider more dangerous?

A) driver speeding well over the speed limit and passing multiple cars in a no-pass zone

B) driver following car in front of them too close


(We all know both are bad and can lead to an accident, but I’m curious what everyone thinks is more dangerous practically and long-term)
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 6:56 pm
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47572 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

But she WAS cited for what was deemed her responsibility.


Not good enough. The lunatics want her (or literally anyone not named Kyren Lacy) charged with negligent vehicular homicide and Lacy to get a posthumous speeding ticket. The law be damned.
Posted by Dubaitiger
Abu Dhabi, UAE
Member since Nov 2005
5214 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

I still can't really understand how him being a couple cars behind the accident and getting back into his lane and slowing down caused the accident. Maybe I'm missing something. Not trying to argue, but would love clarification.


Catfish, when I saw the video come out a couple days ago, I was also thinking it was not Lacy's fault. "How he could have caused that 70-90 yards behind the accident"? However, I will say this then follow up with my thoughts, if Lacy is driving the speed limit in the flow of traffic heading south, and not making passes (in a NO PASSING ZONE) at a VERY HIGH RATE OF SPEED, we WOULD NOT be talking about this because there would not have been an accident.

I drive slow and from a small town with 2 lane roads with 2-way traffic. In fact, I and someone in front of me was run off the road a few days ago because this person swerved into our side of the lane and car in front of me traveling in the same direction went off the road. By the time that car got to me, he was almost fully in my lane, so I had to get off the road completely, on an inclined shoulder and Bayou Teche is only about 35-40 yards from the road. My slow driving saved me from flipping or running into the bayou. I kept the car upright and hopped back on the road.

With this new video, this whole thing started with Lacy driving too fast and passing cars in a no passing zone and driving extremely fast and reckless. With his last pass, prior to braking and getting back in his south lane, Lacy's high speed while passing a 18 wheeler and another car while in the north lane, scared the crap out of the gold pickup truck driver, who pulled off the side of the north bound lane to avoid a head on collision with Lacy's car. However, Lacy hit the breaks and pulled back in his lane.

What we cannot see if the gold truck hit the breaks fast or just pulled off the road at current speed or light breaking. What happened is that made the white car behind the gold truck pull to the left and hit the truck in the southbound lane about 3 cars in front of Lacy. I do not know if she was following too close, or not paying attention, but gold truck made a decision (like I would have made) to get off the road because a car was passing cars heading right to me.

Like I said earlier, this would not have happened if Lacy was driving the speed limit (or even exceeding it a small amount) and not passing cars in a no passing zone on a 2 way road.

Can get him for reckless driving, and something else pertaining to the crash or actually causing the crash from his reckless driving.
Not hit and run because he did not hit anyone.
However, he went through the wreck scene without stopping, putting a bullseye on him, and really a dick move, when people could be hurt and need help.
White car also at fault as they got out of their lane due to the chain reaction of the gold truck getting out the way of possible head on collision.






Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
56550 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 7:06 pm to
Speeding is a infraction
Passing illegally is an infraction

PASSING Into incoming traffic at high speed to pass is very dangerous

Being behind someone too close is unsafe but not unlawful

Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87991 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 7:08 pm to
Yes it is:

Louisiana tailgating laws prohibit following other vehicles "more closely than is reasonable and prudent" (RS 32:81), a traffic violation with potential fines and license points, but don't set a specific distance for personal vehicles.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47572 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 7:09 pm to
If people want to play that game, then why isn’t anyone blaming the gold truck? If Lacy was well back in his lane as they all claim, why did he recklessly swerve halfway off the road before bailing into a parking lot at 30 MPH?

Isn’t he as much to blame as anyone? Werent there traffic violations like reckless driving and improper lane change committed by this individual too? Why wasn’t he cited like Funyuns was?







See how fricking stupid that all sounds?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47572 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 7:10 pm to
You are right, but you’d still have to prove it. Thats likely the issue here.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40227 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 7:10 pm to
PurpNGold I may have missed it .. what would you consider their charges to be? Either one charged with homicide or whatever (if anything) it would be considered for the gentleman’s death?
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21184 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

And if you hit someone because of that reckless driving, they would more than likely be at fault and not you.

I can’t control other drivers, but I can control my own driving. I’ve avoided many accidents by paying attention to these speed demons and reckless drivers. I’ve probably saved my own life and others numerous times. I control the things I can control.
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
20826 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

The Lacy apologists are assuming EVERYTHING about the lady: Reckless driving, speeding, distracted, following too close... nothing in the evidence says this, but its assumed.


Your statement is incorrect.

Matt Ory video shows data from Funyun's black box. That data shows her speed at 49.6 mph, no braking until it was too late and making a 75° turn to the left.

Keep in mind that this data is from the DA's investigation not his own.

What if Lacy was in a passing zone and he did everything the same? You pretty much have to gun it to overtake and pass vehicles. Once you get back into the proper lane you still may have to "brake aggressively" to avoid any traffic in same lane that you might overtake. If Funyuns was in oncoming lane, sees him and still crosses center line, is he still at fault for what she did?





Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52191 posts
Posted on 10/7/25 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

Yes it is:

Louisiana tailgating laws prohibit following other vehicles "more closely than is reasonable and prudent" (RS 32:81), a traffic violation with potential fines and license points, but don't set a specific distance for personal vehicles.


It’s already been shown that she was going almost 50 MPH. She was speeding as well. I doubt she was following too closely as the truck driver says he was already going slow before having to brake.

She was speeding and wasn’t fully paying attention. This is no way absolves Lacy of his actions. It just makes it clear that more than one person is to blame for what happened.
Jump to page
Page First 33 34 35 36 37 ... 60
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 35 of 60Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram