- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:10 pm to msutiger
Bendini Lambert & Locke were overbilling according to Mitch McDere
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:14 pm to 1999
Moscona tweet should be taken at face value: nothing
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:15 pm to JoeENorthlando
Ok.
They will be allowed to play assuming they get their own TRO and SEC will not be able to punish teams who play them under a TRO
OR
The sec will have to punish everyone equally playing players under TRO
What is hard to understand about that
They will be allowed to play assuming they get their own TRO and SEC will not be able to punish teams who play them under a TRO
OR
The sec will have to punish everyone equally playing players under TRO
What is hard to understand about that
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:15 pm to GeauxLaneTrain
quote:
Hey Sankey if you ban Chambliss we will talk
and Cole Hutson, Mark Mitchell, etc...
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:17 pm to 1999
The judge is saying they are eligible to play college football. The SEC is saying that they just can't play in our league without the university that chooses to play them having large consequences. I don't have a problem with that. In fact, if the playoff committee came out and said that whoever plays any player the NCAA doesn't want playing would be banned from the playoffs, then all of this wild west shite would dry up quick.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:17 pm to Fun Bunch
But Wendell's talent was in affecting favorable settlements for his clients. He hated going to court.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:18 pm to 1999
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:19 pm to GulfSouthTiger
And those players will consider your concerns I am sure.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:21 pm to tke_swamprat
quote:
Exactly. What's the difference between these football players and the guy who was in the G league and was allowed to come back and play basketball for Alabama?
Bediako lost in court in no small part due to Sankey throwing all his weight and support behind the NCAA and then promising to do everything he could in the future to fight these exceptions being granted unevenly by local courts.
Sankey's SEC level attempt to specifically halt signings of G League/NFL players from an athletic department -- instead of local court level -- are really a continuation of his reaction to the Bediako case.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:22 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Tony Clayton is, by far, the best trial lawyer in Louisiana and up there with Wendell Gautier as maybe the best ever.
Give us your top 10
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:26 pm to themunch
quote:I don't give a frick if they do or not. But it is fricking stupid that these players and attorneys are trying to dictate how college football operates. frick them. NFL players don't have this much say.
And those players will consider your concerns I am sure
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:29 pm to 1999
Lane may not even make it back to Oxford to play Ole Miss. If he plays ex-NFL players against Clemson or Louisiana Tech the SEC will suspend him.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:31 pm to Shooter
This is not happening. I'm all for what's going on right now because they're being selective on targeting LSU because of their competitive advantages. However, what this will do is paint LSU as a target throughout the entire season and you'll see the SEC refs hit LSU hard in games due to corruption from the SEC offices for them sticking it to them.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:37 pm to wm72
quote:
Sankey throwing all his weight and support behind the NCAA and then promising to do everything he could in the future to fight these exceptions being granted unevenly by local courts.
Then OM should be punished the same.
He will have to argue why some players are ineligible and some are SUPER INELIGIBLE. Specifically citing Huston and Chambliss.
And it will be very difficult to have a logic based argument on that.
Feelings and nostalgia are on Chambliss side compared to the younger guys due to them having participated in NfL activities but not logic.
Huston and Texas don’t even have that.
All sankey has there is he sucked too much to get as far as wright did so it’s different….for reasons
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:40 pm to 1999
And why he makes it retroactive.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:42 pm to GulfSouthTiger
quote:
But it is fricking stupid that these players and attorneys are trying to dictate how college football operates
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:45 pm to redfish99
It's not about gets or gains. It's about players challenging the NCAA rules on their eligibility. Why? Because the NCAA has changed these rules many times based on, OTHER LAWSUITS in the recent past. Players want that extra year now that 5 for 5 is the rule. The NCAA just keeps losing because their rules have been indefensible and the courts concur.
The NCAA opened this door and now it can't shut it.
The NCAA opened this door and now it can't shut it.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:47 pm to DustInTheWind
quote:
LSU isn’t suing anybody
The opposite should happen.
These players should name LSU in their suit and force the judge to specifically order LSU to ignore any external pressure or risk penalty.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 12:54 pm to 1999
Time for CLK/CWW and LSU to move on from these distractions and win some football games!
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News