- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live hearing thread
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:48 pm to vl100butch
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:48 pm to vl100butch
quote:
Will the case continue today after the recess or start again tomorrow?
Liz said they're about to go back in shortly.
0
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:48 pm to 1999
AG made a good point about SEC filing in AL.
SEC claims it’s not an entity, just a group of member institutions. If so, it has no juridical personhood sufficient to file suit.
Not sure that’s true, but if true, is a good basis to seek partial dismissal based on no standing
SEC claims it’s not an entity, just a group of member institutions. If so, it has no juridical personhood sufficient to file suit.
Not sure that’s true, but if true, is a good basis to seek partial dismissal based on no standing
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:54 pm to afinewagoneer
quote:
can we print the shirts now?
I posted this exact same thing the other day, got downvoted and thread got deleted
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:54 pm to Cliff Booth
quote:
Is that another quote from Tony's maw maw?
No it’s just reality
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:54 pm to Cliff Booth
quote:
Is that another quote from Tony's maw maw?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:55 pm to cajuntiger1010
quote:
Murrill said Sankey is leaving the court for good today
He's been to enough LSU games to know that you have to beat that Baton Rouge traffic.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:55 pm to NC_Tigah
Hold in intentional contempt
Lock Sankey up until Monday
Fine the SEC $20 M
Lock Sankey up until Monday
Fine the SEC $20 M
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:56 pm to Geauxldilocks
quote:
the monetary damages to the players could approach $100M.
Whoa.
$100M?
How is this possible? Not doubting you I just truly don't understand. Not a lawyer by any means, but how could the damages be that high?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:56 pm to More beer please
quote:
Rules are only implemented where they see fit not in all cases and thats the problem.
If a judge makes a statement like that the member University Presidents need to be on a conference call tonight and pull the plug on Sankey
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:56 pm to RummelTiger
quote:Bingo!
Sankey may have well set the SEC back quite a bit.
.... and suddenly, all those programs he thought were supporters, will defend him like like a screen door on a submarine.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:56 pm to tigerskin
Plus, Chambliss got his 6th year of eligibility on a redshirt rule. Redshirts no longer exist. Does this mean he is breaking the rules.
Plus, Ole Miss tried to get these guys and they chose LSU. SO IS ole Miss actively recruiting. Will the SEC sue them, too?
Double standards everywhere.
Plus, Ole Miss tried to get these guys and they chose LSU. SO IS ole Miss actively recruiting. Will the SEC sue them, too?
Double standards everywhere.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:57 pm to LSU4LIFEo85
quote:
AG made a good point about SEC filing in AL.
Heard the interview, basically called it laughable
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:58 pm to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
Their argument is that the guys in Class of 2022 that exhausted eligibility never "Declared" for the draft. It happens by default.
The SEC's argument is that this "declared for a draft" rule is aimed at underclassmen that declared for a draft before their eligibility was exhausted.
Their rule doesn’t say anything about declaring. It says you have to properly withdrawal. Even if its an auto entry, you’d still have to withdrawal.
Just another example of them talking in circles and not really enforcing anything.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:58 pm to PUB
I would build a cell in the student section for him on Saturday night.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:59 pm to PUB
It looks like the move is to get 5th year guys that weren't quite good enough to get extended look from NFL
So just "kind of" ineligible
So just "kind of" ineligible
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:59 pm to LabGuru
quote:
How is this possible? Not doubting you I just truly don't understand. Not a lawyer by any means, but how could the damages be that high?
Personal distress, anguish, and anything else you can throw against the wall and get to stick!!!
If one of these guys were allowed back, went off in a big way, and lost out on that chance, a jury in a civil court could grant them millions in damages!!!
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:59 pm to b rod lsu
On a redshirt. They are no longer a factor.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 3:59 pm to LabGuru
quote:
$100M? How is this possible? Not doubting you I just truly don't understand. Not a lawyer by any means, but how could the damages be that high?
There were 44 plaintiffs originally, though this case reduced to ones that impact LSU in Louisiana. If preliminary injunction granted expect many more NFL cut players eligible under 5-5 to file.
$2M each is not outlandish.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:00 pm to Dlab2013
My guess is they are definitely incorporated and they clearly have bylaws and regulations, so they exist as an entity.
They enforce trademarks, etc, so “something” exists, but just not clear on whether they have standing in the capacity they claim.
They enforce trademarks, etc, so “something” exists, but just not clear on whether they have standing in the capacity they claim.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 4:00 pm to Raging Tiger
quote:
I would build a cell in the student section for him on Saturday night.
Mike’s old wagon cage? Mike doesn’t need to be in it.
Page 51 of 57
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News