- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live hearing thread
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:16 pm to UnsureTiger
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:16 pm to UnsureTiger
Sankeys attorney has been questioning him for a while. Line of questioning is focused around how this will ruin the future of college football if teams are allowed to recruit players cut by the NFL as well as players who will be cut from their college teams and replaced by these NFL players.
We know that both of those points are wrong, but that's the direction the Sec is taking.
We know that both of those points are wrong, but that's the direction the Sec is taking.
7
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:16 pm to CecildaDiesel
I’m just now able to catch up again. Are they still in court?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:16 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
This is pride getting in the way of reason.
I get it. It should be fair and it isn't.
They are making an example of LSU and its only going to get worse. This level of distraction, bad will, negative press, etc is just not worth it.
It was worth it for OM because Chambliss is a QB
These guys are backups.
Maybe. Maybe not.
Maybe the back-ups are the ones we should be standing up for - not just the starters.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:17 pm to 1999
quote:Bingo
even worse, probably the "just promote frank wilson" crowd
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:17 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
this really is a stupid fight for LSU when the best player they're trying to bring in is a backup TE.
I think this is Lane proving once again that he will go to the mat for players. Frickking beast. I like it.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:17 pm to tigerskin
quote:depends on the agenda of the person writing the articles...
Is the Notre Dame DE a regular 5/5 guy?
Talty being factually wrong
quote:
The Tigers have signed three former NFL players so far -- Harris, former Ole Miss tight end Dae'quan Wright and former Notre Dame EDGE Junior Tuihalamaka -- and have had conversations with others who remain in NFL camps ahead of the league's cut day on Aug. 30.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:18 pm to AcadiaParishTiger
quote:
Any TLDR updates ?
LSU stacked
Sankey fricked
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:18 pm to tigerbait2010
quote:
Then the Big 10 will be on the phone with LSU seconds later and we make more money. If Greg Sankey really goes there he’s going to be a case study as famous as Chrysler and the Delorean
We should, as of yesterday, be on the phone with the Big 10 cutting a deal to get in next season. frick the SEC. Big10 is arguably the better conference now anyway. Might be fun to play Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, Indiana every year. frick Bama and it’s Birmingham lapdogs.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:18 pm to Decatur
Not about anything but a dick measuring contest now and Sankey has 3 inches max.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:18 pm to Decatur
If they're suing LSU do they have any proof that LSU colluded with the players? They would have to prevent something here I would imagine? This feels like that will get thrown out unless LSU was dumb enough to give them something to work with. I sure hope we're not that dumb. That's hard to believe.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:19 pm to Giantkiller
I don't know who you are but ok. Its pretty clear you are beyond reason or understanding
I think LSU and the players are right and have repeatedly defended them in this thread. Legally, what the SEC is doing and with Hutson in particular is insane.
Its a very minor argument to question whether all of this is worth it. It is not.
I think LSU and the players are right and have repeatedly defended them in this thread. Legally, what the SEC is doing and with Hutson in particular is insane.
Its a very minor argument to question whether all of this is worth it. It is not.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:19 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
Line of questioning is focused around how this will ruin the future of college football if teams are allowed to recruit players cut by the NFL as well as players who will be cut from their college teams and replaced by these NFL players.
Appeal to emotion.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:19 pm to AcadiaParishTiger
quote:
Any TLDR updates ?
Judge said hes aware Sankey will follow the rules until he decides not to follow the rules.
Lawyer got sankey to admit the players in the suit would be eligible under the 5 for 5 rule
some of our fanbase is made up of fricking morons
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:19 pm to AcadiaParishTiger
quote:
Any TLDR updates ?
quote:
Currently the attorney for the Vanderbilt player is questioning. He questioned several times about will Vanderbilt be punished if the judge rules in his favor they allow this player to play.
Sankey danced around question and his attorney objected. The question had to asked and danced around/objected to at least 5 times.
Then judge said "I get what you're trying to ask and I see that he is not going to answer, but I understand his answer. He is going to follow the rules and the bylaws until the point that he is not going to follow them anymore"
Biggest one I've seen so far and I've been refreshing for 30 pages
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:19 pm to UnsureTiger
Using the old “think about the children” defense.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:19 pm to Pax Regis
The Big 10 has zero interest in LSU. They don't meet any of the requirements for us to get in particularly in areas like academics.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:19 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
Sankeys attorney has been questioning him for a while. Line of questioning is focused around how this will ruin the future of college football if teams are allowed to recruit players cut by the NFL as well as players who will be cut from their college teams and replaced by these NFL players. We know that both of those points are wrong, but that's the direction the Sec is taking.
Man, I love the line of questioning that this opens up on rebuttal.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:19 pm to TutHillTiger
What are the chances this results in a removal of Sankey and some sort of reorg of the SEC board or whatever they are called?
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:20 pm to klrstix
This might be the way go get LSU out and out of the TV deal to get more $$$$$
Im sure espn will want a discount if there is no LSU and the SEC will get 3 new members. To equal the big 10 and get a new TV deal.
It is always about money never about honor or sport, academics ect always $$$
LSU is already the boogeyman let the them be the scape goat
Im sure espn will want a discount if there is no LSU and the SEC will get 3 new members. To equal the big 10 and get a new TV deal.
It is always about money never about honor or sport, academics ect always $$$
LSU is already the boogeyman let the them be the scape goat
Posted on 9/3/26 at 2:20 pm to Lsupimp
quote:You are on the right track.
Bottom line SEC argument fwiw: Louisiana may be able to declare these guys eligible to play college football, but Louisiana cannot force the Southeastern Conference to accept LSU playing them under our banner while preventing us from enforcing our own rules.
Page 34 of 51
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News