- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | Texas A&M |
| Location: | Wichita Falls, Texas |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | baseball |
| Occupation: | Attorney |
| Number of Posts: | 3092 |
| Registered on: | 7/28/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Scenario if the BAMA vs Jawja game has to be moved.
Posted by twk on 10/6/26 at 1:51 pm to Night Vision
quote:No thanks. Already have travel plans.
Move it to the week of Oct 24, Jawja's open week.
We play aTm that week and if you bump that game one week that is aTm's open week as well as ours.
re: All Arky, Aggie and Gamecock fans get in here!!
Posted by twk on 9/28/26 at 2:56 pm to Lonnie Utah
They have a weekly article in the Athletic every Monday for SEC vibes rankings -- not a ranking of how your team is playing, but how your fans feel about it. I was shocked that A&M wasn't at 16, but I guess I could see the case for some of the others.
I'm surprised that they are televising this week's A&M v. Arkansas game on linear television. I would have thought this would be a prime candidate for a streaming only game. Or perhaps a telegraphic recreation.
Can't believe I'm traveling to Columbia for our game in November. That will be a hoot.
I'm surprised that they are televising this week's A&M v. Arkansas game on linear television. I would have thought this would be a prime candidate for a streaming only game. Or perhaps a telegraphic recreation.
Can't believe I'm traveling to Columbia for our game in November. That will be a hoot.
It's always been a chore to explain to folks that, for the television networks, an 11 am kick is not a punishment, it's just them trying to set things up for the best ratings over the course of the day. And, to the extent that having a big game at 11 hurts the competition, so much the better from their point of view.
With the new ESPN deal, at least some of these early kicks don't come as a late surprise.
With the new ESPN deal, at least some of these early kicks don't come as a late surprise.
quote:Thats like being the tallest midget.
Texas has the best color orange and it's not even close. The fact that some even think it's debatable is funny. Tennessee is a dark yellow shade of orange and it just doesn't look good. Facts.
quote:You guys need to watch the video clip again. The die was cast when CBS stiffed the SEC in 2012. They had no shot at getting an extension after that. They probably won’t even have a shot when the current contract expires. SEC knows how to hold a grudge.quote:No, the biggest head scratcher is why they refused to give the SEC $300 million and instead did a deal with the Big Ten for $350 million. They way over paid for a terrible product.
That’s the biggest head scratcher as to why they didn’t try harder to make a deal. You know they are bleeding money right now.
quote:Arkansas was already in the SEC when the Southwest Conference imploded. I guess you could say that they should have been the ones forcing a move to the Big 8 (and there was talk about this in the ‘80s), but it takes two to tango, and it took some softening up for the Big 8 membership to realize that things were going to have to change because they had no TV markets (and Arkansas wouldn’t have helped in that regard). It was the SEC that had the vision to realize that the status quo would not last (Penn States move to the Big Ten was the first domino to fall).
Their downfall was not joining the Big 12 when the Southwest Conference folded. Could have kicked Baylor out, maybe, for Arkansas instead. If they had fought hard to get in the south division of the Big 12, they literally could have taken Nebraska's spot in the annual turkey day game against OU, and it would have been a big deal for their recruiting, in my opinion. It would have become a natural rivalry game to look forward too. Not like the Red River shootout, but more like Texas vs A&M on Turkey day. And, more importantly TV sets in Texas would tune in for that game. Nebraska would have thrown a major hissy fit over that but who cares. No foresight though on Arkansas part..
You also have to remember that Arkansas was a poor state, and Northwest Arkansas was not the economic boom area that it would later become. The fact that Fayetteville was closer to a bunch of Big 8 schools didn’t matter much when Fayetteville was just a small college town. The state as a whole was more oriented south than west.
re: BREAKING: Ole Miss bans students of a certain color from their gatherings
Posted by twk on 9/17/26 at 5:05 pm to DomesticatedBoar
Welcome to English soccer
re: Key Provisions of the Protect College Sports Act
Posted by twk on 9/17/26 at 2:28 pm to SpartanSoul
quote:Under federal antitrust law as it existed at the time. Congress passed the antitrust law. Congress can amend it (and thereby effectively overturn a Supreme Court ruling) if it wishes.
Supreme Court has already said this isn't going to fly.
re: NFL releases memo on two LSU players
Posted by twk on 9/16/26 at 10:02 pm to DeathByTossDive226
quote:The SEC has always implemented the NCAA’s amateurism rules. The fact that the NCAA has been prevented from enforcing that standard, as a monopoly, does not mean that the SEC (not a monopoly) can be barred from enforcing that standard on antitrust grounds. Some LSU fan sitting in the bench in Baton Rouge doesn’t get to rewrite the SEC rule book at his whim.
The SEC is not entitled to retroactively implement rules that fly in the face of a court order. The NCAA is not entitled to write rules that clearly unfairly disadvantage one high school class. And the US government wrote the rulebook on antitrust, so at least that answer is clear.
You might be barred from spanking someone else’s child but that doesn’t mean they are barred, too.
re: NFL releases memo on two LSU players
Posted by twk on 9/16/26 at 5:28 pm to DeathByTossDive226
quote:The point is, who writes the rules? Corrupt local judges or the leagues? SEC is entitled to have a rule barring guys who have signed player contracts with the NFL (cue the apologists who want to insist the line should be drawn somewhere else, just because).
I just don’t understand what TF the point of this shite is.
quote:Anyone can file suit, but getting a final judgment is another matter. LSU, like any other state school, is presumably (I don’t do Louisiana law) going to be protected from suit by sovereign immunity. Now, whatever private entity signed NIL deals with these guys might not be so lucky, but these players aren’t getting money out of LSU’s pocket.
They are going to sue LSU.
re: Your team's latest kickoff?
Posted by twk on 9/12/26 at 7:48 am to GetPiggywithIt
A&M played Houston in the Astrodome in 1980. Problem was that the Astros made the playoffs for the first time in their history, and were the prime tenants. Astros hosted the Phillies in the afternoon, then the stadium had to be converted for football. The game kicked off at 11:33 pm.
re: aTm 9/11 Tribute
Posted by twk on 9/11/26 at 9:54 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:The North end zone stands were built in 1999. When they did the major renovation in 2015, they wanted to bring the seats on the sideline closer, which required lowering the field, but they had to move it 20 feet or so south so that the folks in the north endzone could see the back line of the endzone. They did not rebuild the east 2nd and 3rd decks (which are totally student seating) because new construction would have been less densely packed and reduced capacity (would have added some cost, too).
The stands behind the field being off center with the field bothers me though May just be the angle.
re: Elko said "LSU got some parenting"
Posted by twk on 9/10/26 at 8:09 am to ColoradoElkHerd
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Here's the quote:
quote:
Texas A&M coach Mike Elko received a written question from a fan on his radio show jokingly asking if the SEC voted LSU out of the league, would the Tigers go independent or go to the NFL?
“This is a little bit like the son figuring out where the limits are until dad comes home and raises his voice, and then the son goes, ‘I was just kidding, I didn’t mean any of that.’ I think that’s what you’re seeing.
“LSU will be in the SEC. LSU will be fired up when we go to Baton Rouge in a couple weeks. All of those things are going to happen. This is just a little bit of, parenting, going on right now.”
re: So no vote to kick out LSU?
Posted by twk on 9/9/26 at 5:53 pm to BeachsideLBC
Ted Cruz did introduce the legislation and has been trying to get it through the Senate.
re: So no vote to kick out LSU?
Posted by twk on 9/9/26 at 5:22 pm to El Segundo Guy
quote:Pretty much this.
LSU bent the knee. No reason to vote to expel. It's obvious to everyone, (and should be for even LSU fans) that Lane was playing frick around games with the last w roster spots. Now that it's a done deal, there's no reason to talk about expelling LSU. Now a penalty or suspension Lane? Who knows. I really don't care, but I guess it's possible because Lane was really trolling and poking the rest of the SEC, which is pretty ridiculous for a HC to do. LSU fans will defend his trolling, but let's face it, there's a time and place to troll and he stepped over the line.
The eligibility issues need to get resolved, and by that, I mean all these suits where athletes run to court to get injunctive relief from the application of rules. What’s different here, and in the Sorsby case, is that when courts relied on antitrust laws to slap around the NCAA, the conferences stepped in to assert their authority to regulate their own competition. We desperately need Congress to pass legislation that takes these decisions out of the hands of judges, or at least removes the ability of players to shop for a favorable forum.
If John Kennedy would stop flapping his gums for a moment, and try to actually do something productive, he could get behind the Protect College Sports Act. That’s what we need our politicians to do. If they want to tweek it here and there, then sit down and work it out, but until they get off their asses and get this legislation passed, the field will be ripe for people who want to use the courts to push the envelope.
re: What should happen vs what will happen
Posted by twk on 9/9/26 at 8:40 am to stephendomalley
quote:And I suppose all those attorneys they hired are just working for free? Come on, man. Just admit it. This has been a Lane Kiffin production from the start. He started it. If he can't stop it, then that's a reason why LSU might have to go. We can't have a league that is run by the politicians in BR.
this is B .S. they'll never prove these allegations. LSU encouraged players to sue? that's a new one. as if they needed encouragement.
re: What should happen vs what will happen
Posted by twk on 9/9/26 at 8:27 am to Pikes Peak Tiger
You left out a step.
LSU needs to get the Louisiana suit dismissed. We know all the protestations about it being the players acting on their own are total BS, as evidenced by the Louisiana AG sitting at the counsel table with the plaintiff's during the injunction hearing. Kiffin initiated the litigation. LSU can bring it to a halt.
Good analysis of the legal situation can be found, here: Trish Whitcomb Substack
The judge in BR has yet to sign the injunction order, but the draft prepared by the plaintiff's attorneys (which is standard operating procedure -- state trial court judges don't usually draft their own orders, instead relying on the prevailing side to draft it) basically leaves the SEC with no remedy short of expelling LSU. If the BR suit is dismissed, and the SEC is given other options, then all the litigation can stop, the SEC can impose appropriate penalties (way short of expulsion), and sanity can be restored.
LSU needs to get the Louisiana suit dismissed. We know all the protestations about it being the players acting on their own are total BS, as evidenced by the Louisiana AG sitting at the counsel table with the plaintiff's during the injunction hearing. Kiffin initiated the litigation. LSU can bring it to a halt.
Good analysis of the legal situation can be found, here: Trish Whitcomb Substack
The judge in BR has yet to sign the injunction order, but the draft prepared by the plaintiff's attorneys (which is standard operating procedure -- state trial court judges don't usually draft their own orders, instead relying on the prevailing side to draft it) basically leaves the SEC with no remedy short of expelling LSU. If the BR suit is dismissed, and the SEC is given other options, then all the litigation can stop, the SEC can impose appropriate penalties (way short of expulsion), and sanity can be restored.
I’m not really expecting immediate expulsion, but the scenario that I could see as somewhat feasible would be a vote to expel LSU effective at the end of the school year (June 30). That would give both sides a window to work something out, but put it on a relatively short fuse.
I get the feeling the presidents not only hate Kiffin, but also, are not fans of Wade Rousse. LSU may need someone else lobbying the presidents, because this guy has blown his credibility with the Kiffin thing, and Will Wade as the cherry on top.
I get the feeling the presidents not only hate Kiffin, but also, are not fans of Wade Rousse. LSU may need someone else lobbying the presidents, because this guy has blown his credibility with the Kiffin thing, and Will Wade as the cherry on top.
re: LSU is actually being southern and standing up to totalitarianism
Posted by twk on 9/8/26 at 7:31 pm to BootyFett69
Defending Lane Kiffin, as loathsome as that is, probably isn’t as bad a cause as supporting slavery.
Probably
Probably
quote:See, that's where this mess all got started. Too much forum shopping in the courts (and not just the LSU case). Unfortunately, only Congress can stop it.
You guys better start for forum shopping ;)
Popular

0












