- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “Lance Heard evaluating his role at LSU” per Kelly
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:20 pm to tigersquad89
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:20 pm to tigersquad89
The main problem with this is that he doesn’t need to sit out the game to evaluate his role. As good as he projects to be, I would still have a hard time talking him into staying on the team if I was BK.
0
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:21 pm to SwampyWaters
quote:
make no mistake about it, all universities and these private companies work hand-in-hand and one doesn't act without the other knowing about it. That's the only way it works.
Everyone knows that.
They still have zero control & power. If, as a player, you are good enough to garner an NIL deal, you will always have the power.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:22 pm to Lester Earl
Sure you can. A contractual agreement between the school and the athlete doesn’t have to be tied to his NIL. A pro athlete can have deals with shoe companies that have no bearing on their player contracts.
And there’s nothing stopping the NCAA from stepping in and regulating NIL in the future. Eventually something like this will have to happen.
And there’s nothing stopping the NCAA from stepping in and regulating NIL in the future. Eventually something like this will have to happen.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:23 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
A contractual agreement between the school and the athlete doesn’t have to be tied to his NIL.
They already have that. It’s called a scholarship
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:25 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
Yes, the NCAA could help things by restoring the former rules requiring players to sit out a year when transfering, but they would be pummeled with lawsuits within a few hours. You can't grant a right and then take it back.
The transfer portal was never the problem, the immediate eligibility was what caused the dam to break. The portal would be far, far smaller if players had to sit out a year. The NCAA completely botched it, and there's no going back.
The transfer portal was never the problem, the immediate eligibility was what caused the dam to break. The portal would be far, far smaller if players had to sit out a year. The NCAA completely botched it, and there's no going back.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:27 pm to Lester Earl
Ok? I’m clearly talking about something different than the current system to better protect all stakeholders in this process, but if being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian is THAT important to you, by all means carry on.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:27 pm to tigersquad89
Gotta be nice to have teams calling offering money and a starting spot in the lineup
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:29 pm to BillF
There’s definitely no going back to what we had before, but there’s certainly things that could be done to fix the issues. The schools will demand it.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:30 pm to Locoguan0
quote:
Renegotiating his NIL. If these kids want to get paid like adults, they should be held accountable like adults. Make them sign a contract.
Do you think he didn't sign a contract to fulfill his NIL responsibilities?
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:30 pm to CatsGoneWild
The NIL version of a holdout except its not pre-season.
You are playing for your team and teammates to achieve a 10 win season. Guess that's not important to you. Its a choice but its a bad one
You are playing for your team and teammates to achieve a 10 win season. Guess that's not important to you. Its a choice but its a bad one
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:30 pm to CatsGoneWild
quote:
He can’t play a game and think about it before and afterwards?
He gets hurt, his value goes down.
College football, late 2023, here we are
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:32 pm to Vacherie Saint
If the players and patrons could agree to a longer contract of incentives and vice versa then I could see that working. Ultimately however the transfer portal and immediate playing time is the bargaining chip that needs to be regulated for the benefit of everybody involved, including the players.
This post was edited on 12/29/23 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:32 pm to tigersquad89
How exhausting is it to be a college coach now?
You have to recruit and also recruit your own team every year.
You have to recruit and also recruit your own team every year.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:33 pm to BayouCowboy
Not showing up says he's gone.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:33 pm to CBandits82
They get more than fairly compensated however
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:36 pm to Vacherie Saint
True, NIL needs to be regulated, but no one seems to know how that would work. You can't restrict how much money a player can make on an NIL deal, so what can you do?
Make them employees? Give them revenue sharing? The NCAA can't and won't solve this. Congress is probably the most logical route, but I'm not sure they know what to do, either.
Make them employees? Give them revenue sharing? The NCAA can't and won't solve this. Congress is probably the most logical route, but I'm not sure they know what to do, either.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:37 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
his NIL responsibilities
Does actually playing in a game for your team count?
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:38 pm to BillF
Did anybody hear Jordy this morning saying he heard Ole Miss is paying players in the transfer portal 20% more then what they are asking for so they can’t say no to them?
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:39 pm to BillF
quote:
Yes, the NCAA could help things by restoring the former rules requiring players to sit out a year when transfering, but they would be pummeled with lawsuits within a few hours. You can't grant a right and then take it back.
It was all in the way it was handled. The NCAA is still in control of the eligibility clock and that has never been challenged. 5 to play 4 is the rule and has been the rule for a long time. The extra eligibility that has been given - 6th or 7th years - has all been voluntary, not forced through the courts. They should have handled the transfers by using the eligibility clock and causing players to lose years.
Posted on 12/29/23 at 1:40 pm to tigersquad89
quote:Just gotta stall until the portal closes on Tuesday.
We will pick up the conversations with him and his family after the bowl game
Of course, doubt the NCAA would enforce anything it's after the transfer window closes.
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News