- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is the CFP committee the ultimate nuke on NFL players in college ball?
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:59 am to JoeENorthlando
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:59 am to JoeENorthlando
I was speaking strictly to them putting a “ban” on teams with these players.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 10:59 am to Yaboylsu63
And The undefeated 13-0 Florida State Seminoles were left out of the 2023 College Football Playoff
So...what did they do??
So...what did they do??
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:00 am to CatfishJohn
The undefeated 13-0 Florida State Seminoles were left out of the 2023 College Football Playoff
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:00 am to JoeENorthlando
Was anybody on their 2023 team in prior legal engagements over eligibility?
Apples and oranges
Apples and oranges
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:01 am to T1gerNate
quote:
Yea this is actually a really good point and why ultimately these guys probably aren’t going to play.
But after typing that I just realized there would be a hole in that logic because if LSU were to be undefeated and #1 that would mean they won the SEC championship, which gives you a guaranteed spot in the playoffs and is not subjective lol
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:02 am to TXTiger81
quote:
The lawsuit will just get amended to add CFP.
CFP is likely removed enough from the NCAA to be able to make and enforce its own rules independently of whatever occurs with the NCAA. Their relationship with the conferences is contractual.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:04 am to Yaboylsu63
This is becoming absolutely ridiculous. This is not for this poster, it's the situation.
You're going to tell me I can get a judge to play me because, I didn't make the team or to play in a game the team didn't win. I can get a judge to get me a TRO because I didn't get the job I wanted.
I believe this is a federal matter and the minute it gets there, the silly state games we are playing all over the country are done.
I will say, if the SEC does go the federal route, it should ask that all state matters be stayed, which would take care of all of the issues, including Chambliss, basketball etc. If we are going to live in fantasy land, let's go all the way.

You're going to tell me I can get a judge to play me because, I didn't make the team or to play in a game the team didn't win. I can get a judge to get me a TRO because I didn't get the job I wanted.
I believe this is a federal matter and the minute it gets there, the silly state games we are playing all over the country are done.
I will say, if the SEC does go the federal route, it should ask that all state matters be stayed, which would take care of all of the issues, including Chambliss, basketball etc. If we are going to live in fantasy land, let's go all the way.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:06 am to NorthTxLSU
So auto-spots are safe. Discretionary spots - screwed.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:07 am to JoeENorthlando
quote:
Nope. There is no injunction or remedy to prevent them from favoring non NFL-player teams. There is no standing to sue or have a court change their judgment as to who makes the tourney. Thanks for playing.
You have been making up facts for days. You dont even look stuff up or cite anything. You're just trolling.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:09 am to JoeENorthlando
quote:
The undefeated 13-0 Florida State Seminoles were left out of the 2023 College Football Playoff
Obviously wouldn't be left out of a 12 team playoff.
If LSU is 11-1/12-0 they aren't going to be able to defend leaving us out, but they'd give us the hardest path amongst teams with similar records.
The other scenario is we're on the bubble and they make us 13 and get away with it without backlash outside of Baton Rouge.
This is assuming the CFP playoff committee is stupid and believes LSU is driving all of this shite and no one else is guilty of anything.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:09 am to JoeENorthlando
NCAA runs march madness so the issue will still exist regardless of what the CFP says.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:11 am to Ebridg3
Corporate lawyer for many years...so I know a little about how the courts work.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:14 am to JoeENorthlando
They won't go for it. They want the best teams in the playoff.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:19 am to Ebridg3
quote:
Nope. There is no injunction or remedy to prevent them from favoring non NFL-player teams. There is no standing to sue or have a court change their judgment as to who makes the tourney. Thanks for playing.
You have been making up facts for days. You dont even look stuff up or cite anything. You're just trolling.
I can kind of justify it.
The players have standing right now because they could lose money. The NCAA says they are ineligible, so that's clear cut.
The SEC says that they would punish the schools. That's another line and it's arguable if it crosses the line.
Now, the CFP is another line altogether. Does not making the CFP financially impact any of these players? That's what a judge would have to determine.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:36 am to BillyBobfan24_7
If I were on the committee, I would say out loud," We told LSU this is what would happen, LSU decided to test us, now a 13-0 LSU squad will get to spend Christmas and New Years watching from home, the brackets are already set."
LSU wanted chaos, they got it......and they only had to spend 50 million a year to get it.
LSU wanted chaos, they got it......and they only had to spend 50 million a year to get it.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:47 am to JoeENorthlando
Then the playoff will be a circus because LSU is not the only school that will have former "NFL" players. However, I could see them leaving LSU out if they are a bubble team to "teach them a lesson".
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:47 am to JoeENorthlando
quote:
Nope. There is no injunction or remedy to prevent them from favoring non NFL-player teams. There is no standing to sue or have a court change their judgment as to who makes the tourney. Thanks for playing.
In the same vein, there's no current threat of irreparable harm that the CFP committee poses. The notion that the committee will cause irreparable harm to these former pro players by leaving out their chosen college teams from the playoff is totally speculative at this point.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:48 am to JoeENorthlando
The fact that they are discussing this and its public opens them up to being included in the lawsuits. The adults who were the ones that caused the issues are just upset that they are getting beat and are trying their best to circumvent the courts.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 11:51 am to JoeENorthlando
I miss when boys were boys, girls were girls, college athletes were college athletes, and pro athletes were pro athletes. Why do we need to be law students to know who tf is on our football team?
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:03 pm to JoeENorthlando
quote:
There is no standing to sue or have a court change their judgment as to who makes the tourney. Thanks for playing.
Except for their own rules when it comes to the power 4 champs right?
Popular
Back to top


0




