- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Sorsby came to LSU and all this went down
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:10 am to dallastiger55
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:10 am to dallastiger55
I would say hit the road if he was at LSU. Other things can be in a gray area, but gambling is black & white. You just can't cross that line.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:12 am to Alt26
Only difference is Tech has absolutely zero contingency at QB, whereas we were smart enough to get a quality backup.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:22 am to dallastiger55
Sorsby's official photo:

Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:23 am to dallastiger55
But we will unite and defend will wade hiring 25 yo bb professional players from the European league lol! Can look in the mirror now if we want. Everyone knows what the real answer is on this subject.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:33 am to dallastiger55
quote:Dude, we win a NC and still don’t have 90% support on TD. This cesspool actually hates certain programs, players, and their own Tigers.
it would be over 90% support on TD
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:36 am to dallastiger55
I think some would defend him like you are saying, but we wouldn’t be in as bad of a spot because we could get behind longstreeet. So I could see a lot of lsu fans get behind him.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:38 am to dallastiger55
If LSU had landed Sorsby and this went down the only thing I can guarantee is the Rant would be melting
We dodged a bullet
We dodged a bullet
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:52 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
if this was accurate, it isn't, that percentage will drastically go down in the next few weeks with all the bad press they are getting. when opposing fanbases and AD's are for cancelling games with your team bc of what is a should be inelligble player your defense of the guy will change. I saw their backup play some last year and would definitely be like frick Sorsby if I was a TT fan.
I constantly read posters on here saying that they like being hated. I know I don't like it, and I wouldn't want this controversy, but I wouldn't assume that adding another reason to hate us would garner majority disapproval by the rant.
I don't know the details of his gambling, but if he was gambling to lose on his own games, then I would be pissed as a fan. If he gambled that they would win, then I would be far less pissed. If he gambled on other games that he couldn't control, then I'm not pissed at all. Gambling is hugely popular, and the question of integrity only comes into play when a player isn't giving full effort in order to win a bet, which would become the question if he bets the team will lose.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:57 am to Lapaz
quote:
I don't know the details of his gambling, but if he was gambling to lose on his own games
He was. Along with betting on hot dog eating contests and obscure sports.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:59 am to Walnut
[insert backup QB name here] is better anways and should start
---- tRant
---- tRant
Posted on 6/9/26 at 10:59 am to dallastiger55
I find it interesting that so many disagree with OP. It's easy to say "he cheated, I would never support him" when he is not your starting QB brought in. I think many on here have integrity and probably wouldn't support him. But, MANY on here (and probably the vast majority) would be defending him and talking about "everyone hates LSU", "this is a hit at Lane"....so forth and so on. I agree with OP. If the shoe were on our foot the conversation would be different
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:07 am to thelawnwranglers
What would Lane say?
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:10 am to dallastiger55
I have never been good with kids betting on sports especially their own team. Thats a red flag.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:23 am to BilJ
quote:
I don't care about any of the NCAA's rules.... but they're still the rules. Why bother having any?
It's one thing to play around with eligibility stuff because the NCAA opened that can of worms during COVID. I don't love that Chambliss is somehow still eligible, but it is what it is. This is an entirely different animal though. It's a known rule with no gray area at all.....don't bet. He did and has admitted guilt; he shouldn't be allowed to play.
If they were enforceable they wouldn't take so many Ls in court
Basically universities want the protection that collectively bargain contract would being but they don't want to collectively bargin
They made this bed and shite the sheets
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:31 am to dallastiger55
I would be upset in the situation we would be put in but in no way would I defend this. I love LSU football but have a deeper love for college football. While I always want LSU to do well without the integrity of the game there is no college football. There is a reason there is no one speaking out on his behalf. Every one agrees this is a terrible precident being set and harms college football. Im not one to dramatize things but this really feels like the beginning of the end of college football.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:36 am to dallastiger55
I wouldn't care. LSU plays in the SEC where it is blatantly obvious games are being rigged. If the players can make money off of it too, so be it.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:40 am to dallastiger55
I healthy portion of LSUs fanbase doesn’t understand why ole miss fans are so upset with the whole Kiffin situation
Of course they’d be blind to the sorsby shite
Of course they’d be blind to the sorsby shite
Posted on 6/9/26 at 11:54 am to dallastiger55
Not the same situation, but look at how this board and LSU fans in general treated the Lane Kiffin situation. I’m happy we have him, but there’s no way you can tell me that this board wouldn’t go scorched earth if the roles were reversed and Ole Miss did that to us.
This board would absolutely defend the Sorsby situation if he was slated to be our starting QB.
In saying all that, frick Ole Miss
This board would absolutely defend the Sorsby situation if he was slated to be our starting QB.
In saying all that, frick Ole Miss
This post was edited on 6/9/26 at 11:55 am
Posted on 6/9/26 at 12:00 pm to Lapaz
quote:
I don't know the details of his gambling, but if he was gambling to lose on his own games, then I would be pissed as a fan. If he gambled that they would win, then I would be far less pissed. If he gambled on other games that he couldn't control, then I'm not pissed at all. Gambling is hugely popular, and the question of integrity only comes into play when a player isn't giving full effort in order to win a bet, which would become the question if he bets the team will lose
as i understand it he idn't bet his team would lose. he may have bet the unders in some games but he wasn't even playing. Why risk playing a guy when at some point, probably after the season, the NCAA will win the appeal and all the games will be forfeited. Every game he plays there will be a black cloud and stigma attached to it by all opposing fans. I personally wouldn't want the scrutiny as a fan.
Posted on 6/9/26 at 12:30 pm to Commanda
quote:
But we will unite and defend will wade hiring 25 yo bb professional players from the European league lol! Can look in the mirror now if we want. Everyone knows what the real answer is on this subject.
Other schools were pursuing those same players. It's pretty trashy, but its also currently allowed.
Someone gambling on his own team, that's always been explicitly not allowed
Popular
Back to top


0






