- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If LSU doesn't make the playoffs this year is this a wasted season?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:27 pm to LSBoosie
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:27 pm to LSBoosie
quote:Ok and point well stated.
I mean I somewhat get that, but I don’t think it’s a guarantee. Our freshman DB’s the last year Raymond was here were Derrick Davis, Sage Ryan, Matthew Langlois, Ralph Walker, Darius McGhee, Everett Garard, Messiah Farinas, Pig Cage
I think Raymond got lazy and lost focus, and wanted to get paid. He has since left, went to Florida, and got fired from there. A bit of a reality check for him.
He could probably find elite DBs that jumped off the page, but didn't have the lay of the land in Fla that he did here.
You do agree it's unusual for LSU not to have a batch of athletes, maybe unknown, but capable of becoming legit D1 starters, right? Raw dudes who just need to be coached into players?
I think we get back to that.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:29 pm to SidewalkTiger
Wow, that’s not a talent eval, that’s your intentional misleading as usual. 9th is where we actually stand so the no talent excuse isn’t valid like I said.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:32 pm to Scoob
quote:
You do agree it's unusual for LSU not to have a batch of athletes, maybe unknown, but capable of becoming legit D1 starters, right? Raw dudes who just need to be coached into players? I think we get back to that.
I agree, I just don’t think it’s guaranteed just because we want it to be. This year we have a 5 star DL that isn’t ready to play and a 3 star CB who is getting legit playing time.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:32 pm to Scoob
Hold up, are you asking a question because immediately after you dismissed any answer to your question. And BTW UGA was in the national title game year 2 so don’t know where you’re getting the idea that it took him longer to build a winner.
This post was edited on 9/18/24 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:37 pm to Scoob
quote:
OP is asking whether this season should be considered "wasted"
of course not
what exactly is being wasted?
There is a reason that the team's highest graded players are mostly Freshmen/Soph and/or transfer guys.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:37 pm to Scoob
Well people said the same thing about our 2020 defense, the worst in school history btw yet 13 of those players made it to the NFL so you could be mistaken in thinking none of these guys can play. Our problems could be elsewhere.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:41 pm to TigerKnights
A Marcus Randall-style QB who can run and who can complete a fly pattern of 90 yards is what this team NEEDS. Nuss has a limited skill set
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:45 pm to Lester Earl
Who are the highest graded players?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:51 pm to LSBoosie
The 2 Jr. Tackles who’ve been here since they were freshman
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:54 pm to Madking
quote:You're not suggesting that Kirby inherited a similar program to what Kelly did, are you?
Hold up, are you asking a question because immediately after you dismissed any answer to your question. And BTW UGA was in the national title game year 2 so don’t know where you’re getting the idea that it took him longer to build a winner.
Kirby took over from Richt, it would be like taking over from Miles. Program is on solid ground, just needs to be tweaked a bit.
Kelly came in post-Orgeron, after the program had been allowed to collapse.
Anyway, I'm making observations, not asking a question.
Like my discussions with LSUBoosie, I see LSU as a potential, and you need a coach to tend that potential and build it. I think we have the immense talent pool to get back to elite, which sets us aside from schools like, say, Wisconsin, etc. We need to rebuild the structure, and then fill back up with talent working within that structure. I think the defense will improve back to traditional LSU standards, and it seems like our offense (read- our QB) will be above what we saw in Dinardo/Saban/Miles eras. I think our WRs will stay great, and our RBs will return to the standard we used to have.
I think Kelly is far better suited for the long-term aspects of this, as compared to a lot of other options. Orgeron could recruit, and he had a natty, but he didn't keep things running. I think Kelly's a stronger program manager than him, by a lot.
Once we get things back to normal, I see the occasional runs at titles, just like we used to under Miles. There may be better gameday guys, but there will be years when we just have the best talent.
I'm not worried about this year, because I think big-picture we're in really good shape.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 12:59 pm to Scoob
Ok but you’re the one that said it took UGA awhile now you’re adding qualifiers that weren’t there in that statement so how am I supposed to retroactively account for that? As far as getting to elite, that’s the beauty of the 12 team playoff, you don’t have to be elite. I’m not saying he has to win it all or even win a playoff game but he said judge him on this year, nobody made him do that.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 1:06 pm to TheFlyingTiger
quote:
Y'all. Kelly can't be on the hot seat if we're not competing for top talent NIL wise.
Wanna bet?
It would be even MORE of a reason...we're competing for top talent and still can't make the playoffs? (Is what those folks would say).
Posted on 9/18/24 at 1:08 pm to boweswi05
No, because we can return a bunch of players to build upon this year. Especially Nuss and other skill position players and defense.
Losing Campbell, Jones, Perk, and Lacy hurts but for the most part we are a pretty young team.
Losing Campbell, Jones, Perk, and Lacy hurts but for the most part we are a pretty young team.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 1:08 pm to RummelTiger
This is what I was talking about earlier, the excuses are so rampant they’re getting to the point of contradicting themselves. Excuses aren’t reasons, they’re dismissals, big difference.
This post was edited on 9/18/24 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 9/18/24 at 1:10 pm to Scoob
You can find arguments both ways. Kalen DeBoer took a 4-8 team then went 11-2 in his first year and 14-1 in his 2nd year, winning a playoff game. So wanting Kelly to make a 12 team playoff in his 3rd year isn’t the craziest of things.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 1:33 pm to Madking
quote:I'm judging on what I've seen done.
I’m not saying he has to win it all or even win a playoff game but he said judge him on this year, nobody made him do that.
Defense was historically bad last year, he made moves to correct that. Despite the breakdowns at times, I think it does look significantly better, and I think the future is bright with that side of the field.
Offense lost 3 first rd guys out of the passing game- a Heisman QB and 2 stud WRs. New offense looks to be a very potent passing attack. I would love to see better run production, I think it can come with more varied formations better suited to the talent at back (I think Jackson would be way more effective running from an under-center formation). I think that's an either/or situation right now, we don't see a shift away from the shotgun until Nussmeier is comfortable lining up under center. Nuss is more important than Jackson in this offense. Hopefully Durham is quick enough to run well in the gun.
We have a return game this year, which is a marked improvement from the past.
Going forward, I think we're going to see continued talent influx, so I think the future looks good.
I never expected a for-sure playoff appearance this year, did you? I hoped we'd be USC, and then we'd be in position for a maybe 10-2 record and a shot. We're still in that spot, but we can only afford to lose 1 more. I didn't expect we'd beat USC, I thought it was a tossup, and I'd like to get out of those openers until we're firmly established again.

Posted on 9/18/24 at 1:40 pm to Scoob
Problem is he’s 3-7 vs ranked teams at LSU and not beating the upper crust teams has always been the knock on Kelly. So far there’s no reason to think he’s figured out how to get over that hump yet.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 1:44 pm to Madking
quote:
Wow, that’s not a talent eval, that’s your intentional misleading as usual. 9th is where we actually stand so the no talent excuse isn’t valid like I said.
So you think we have the 9th best roster in college football? Let me ask you this. How good a defensive roster do you think we have? I don't see many NFL type dudes running around on that side of the ball currently. I think we have some young guys that can get there one day but right now I see 3 maybe 4 guys sophmores and up that are future NFL guys. And I'm counting Womack who hasn't done much yet but I see the potential.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 1:50 pm to redfishfan
You quoted a talent evaluation site that has us 9th which seems correct to me. Again, you guys always do this, if I asked you how many NFL players were on the 2020 defense you’d have said Stingley and Stevens yet 13 of those guys made it to the NFL so claiming this one and that one is an NFL player before they’re drafted is really pointless.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 1:50 pm to Madking
quote:
the worst in school history btw yet 13 of those players made it to the NFL so you could be mistaken in thinking none of these guys can play.
Please name the players from that defense that made it to the NFL. And I'll even let you count Stingley who played half the season and was injured most games. There's no way it's 13 dudes.
Popular
Back to top
