- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How big of a jump will LSU's defense really make in the upcoming year with new faces.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 8:00 am to Mathias5k
Posted on 1/31/24 at 8:00 am to Mathias5k
quote:
Reasonable expectation would be to break into the 80’s somewhere for total defense
That’s a reasonable expectation for a loser.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 8:02 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
Matt House was the worst DC in the school's history. It isn't close.
Ooooo, that’s not true, and THAT is not close! You must have missed some years.

Posted on 1/31/24 at 8:03 am to _KJ_
the pass rush should mature and if the poor tackling is cleaned up, that alone will do wonders.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 8:04 am to Lee Chatelain
Take your upvote for beating me to the tree fiddy proxy.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 8:06 am to _KJ_
We will suck far less. Meteoric leap into mediocrity, which in all seriousness would be yuge.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 8:07 am to moneyg
This!
What impact players have they brought in to fix some of the holes, depth, and problems we saw last year. Offense they loaded up, forgot about bringing in defensive players
What impact players have they brought in to fix some of the holes, depth, and problems we saw last year. Offense they loaded up, forgot about bringing in defensive players
This post was edited on 1/31/24 at 8:08 am
Posted on 1/31/24 at 9:33 am to _KJ_
If we can be decent, we’ll have a great shot at the playoff.
25 and beyond will be nasty.
25 and beyond will be nasty.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 9:45 am to VeryReauxna_ish
quote:
Missouri went from #104 before Blake Baker to #29 in yards per game in his first season.
They also had two very good corners and d linemen.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 9:53 am to Off McVoy
quote:
I think they'll be average....which will be a very big jump.
This.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 10:15 am to Off McVoy
It wouldn’t take much!
We did see a team that finished with the #99 ranked total defense finish as runner-up in the nation. You saw an LSU team with the #108 total defense finish 12th in the final poll. LSU was 13th in the final CFP ranking, which would be two spots behind an at-large for the 12 team playoff.
If LSU doesn’t have a huge offense drop off (Top 25?) and a moderate defensive improvement (Top 60?), the possibility of making the 12-team playoff is high. Just have to go out there and win the games.
We did see a team that finished with the #99 ranked total defense finish as runner-up in the nation. You saw an LSU team with the #108 total defense finish 12th in the final poll. LSU was 13th in the final CFP ranking, which would be two spots behind an at-large for the 12 team playoff.
If LSU doesn’t have a huge offense drop off (Top 25?) and a moderate defensive improvement (Top 60?), the possibility of making the 12-team playoff is high. Just have to go out there and win the games.
This post was edited on 1/31/24 at 10:17 am
Posted on 1/31/24 at 10:16 am to Penrod
quote:
Ooooo, that’s not true, and THAT is not close! You must have missed some years
House's first season probably takes him off the top of the list...but not by much.
Tepper was bad. His defense tanked what should have been a very good 1998 season. Dinardo then doubled-down in 1999 and lost his job as a result.
Pelini in 2020 was bad. But I tend to put that more on the stupidity of Orgeron. Pelini was brought in specifically to run Ed O's "wet dream late 80's Miami/early 00's USC defense". This, despite the fact (1) LSU didn't really have the personnel to do so and (2) offensive football had changed a LOT since those defenses were effective. Ed just had so little actual understanding of the intricacies of the game that he didn't appreciate that. No DC could have succeeded under that buffoon of a HC dictating the defensive approach. That's why in 2021 the defense suddenly went from shite to dominant after the bye week when Ed got out of the way.
But NEITHER of those defenses had a best in the nation offense to work with. Not even close! Because LSU was so dynamic on offense last season the bar for "success" by the defense was incredibly low. And House couldn't even reach arguably the lowest bar in LSU history (or at least the 2nd if you feel the 2019 was even more dynamic than 2021).
So while House may not be the worst simply because he had 1 decent year and Tepper didn't. I think his performance this past season was the single worst defensive coaching performance in LSU history given the circumstances.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 11:45 am to Lee Chatelain
quote:
35.0%
On April 21st, that SouthPark joke will officially be 25 years old. That’s the age where time flies by for a human and it’s time to grow up. For a joke, it’s 24 years past its prime. Let it go. It’s ok to be an adult.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 11:54 am to _KJ_
Just need be in the top 50% and get some occasional turnovers. The offense will be flying high with Nuss flinging it
Posted on 1/31/24 at 12:13 pm to _KJ_
Defense will take a step forward. Offense will take a step back. Tho the offense will still be good.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 12:28 pm to bayou85
Unfortunately, we have room to improve considerably and still suck….I really can’t see how LSU D could possibly be worse than2023.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 12:37 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
I personally believe that they will end up being much better by the end of the year. I think the big question is how long into the season will it take for the new coaches/players/scheme to gel. There will probably be some growing pains early in the year, just based off of all of the turnover.
This is the most accurate answer. Unfortunately, we will still see all the dumbass posts on the scoreboard calling for everyone to be fired in the first half of the first game. At some point, a DB will be out of place and someone will claim victory for saying that Cory Raymond should’ve never been hired back.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 12:39 pm to Faurot fodder
It will improve. Question is, will the offense also fall offsetting the gain in defense?
Posted on 1/31/24 at 1:18 pm to NorthshoreTiger76
quote:
Well considering they were like 117th in total defense, hopefully a lot
If they can jump to Top 50 it would be a vast improvement!
Posted on 2/1/24 at 6:57 am to LSBoosie
I don’t know about the D overall, but the sacks, hurries, ect should take off quick. We have some really good edge rushers starting with Perkins and the best edge rusher coach in the country.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 7:56 am to _KJ_
My expectation is to be in the top 50 and hope they're in the top 30. Its what's needed to compete for the playoffs.
With this staff, I'm hopeful it will happen.
By the way, has anyone figured out what exactly was going wrong on defense in 2023? Too complicated schemes, inferior staff, coaches not working well together???
When your at the bottom there's only one way to go, up!
Go Tigers!!
With this staff, I'm hopeful it will happen.
By the way, has anyone figured out what exactly was going wrong on defense in 2023? Too complicated schemes, inferior staff, coaches not working well together???
When your at the bottom there's only one way to go, up!
Go Tigers!!
Popular
Back to top
