Started By
Message

Finally an explanation bout why Ole Miss went for two so early

Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:49 am
Posted by KCSunshine
Lafayette LA
Member since Dec 2019
974 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:49 am
According to a blog that I find reliable, Rebels at first was lining up for 2 ONLY to SEE possible D formation in case they had to try one later in game.
After the 2nd offside call, they then decided to not kick extra point.
If accurate, definitely shows how little mental mistakes come back to haunt
Them getting 2 there definitely changed our last drive strategy

Makes sense to me now. I don’t care what anyone says, but had they gone for 2 initially it would have been awful strategic call
Posted by FireGoodell
Member since Mar 2019
9097 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:50 am to
I figured they thought Lane would go for 2 if we scored the next drive, so they were just beating him to the punch.
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
27247 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:51 am to
I think they outcoached us in the game. That was a smart move.
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
27083 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:51 am to
DandyDon
Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
7215 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:52 am to
Thought it was obvious it wasn’t their intent initially - that would have been crazy. But glad to get confirmation.
Posted by Bacon84
Texas
Member since Oct 2012
2334 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:53 am to
fortunately for them... LSU is undisciplined AF..

Used to coaches made you run for that kind of shite... I hope that kid is STILL running... He can rest next weekend instead of being in the game...
This post was edited on 9/22/26 at 11:55 am
Posted by BoudinChicot
Member since Sep 2021
2377 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:53 am to
Golding played Lane like a fiddle.
Posted by Cracking
Northshore
Member since Aug 2006
3567 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:54 am to
Those two offsides are inexcusable. One is bad, but I can understand. The second was just terrible.

Posted by NorthTxLSU
Dallas to Austin to Houston
Member since Nov 2018
15226 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:55 am to
Team shite their pants when the lights were bright. Glad this happened early in the season so the next time we're in a dog fight late, we'd have been there already.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
8136 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:57 am to
quote:

According to a blog that I find reliable, Rebels at first was lining up for 2 ONLY to SEE possible D formation in case they had to try one later in game.
After the 2nd offside call, they then decided to not kick extra point.


In a game of this magnitude, you dont f around with gimmicks. Home team, tough game, etc..and you score and kick immediately to go up 7. Nothing else matters
That was an absolutely moronic call by them, even though it worked in their favor...it was stupid. Too many things to go wrong possibly.

Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
13028 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 11:57 am to
You think Lane called in the off sides penalties don’t you?
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
27247 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

You think Lane called in the off sides penalties don’t you?

You can't control what your players do, but Ole Miss was smart to try it to get us to either use a timeout or do what we did twice so that they actually could go for 2 and get it pretty easily. Their coaches just seemed to have more attention to detail with some things.
Posted by iamandykeim
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2015
4101 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Them getting 2 there definitely changed our last drive strategy
I disagree with this, but it definitely added some pressure to the moment. Even if we get this in the endzone, we then have to do it again.

Also, Lane very well might have gone for 2 himself if we were down by 1.
Posted by Bengal tail
Member since Aug 2016
799 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:05 pm to
Yes, but if we scored the touchdown instead of the FG, it would have been 32-31, so our last drive would of been a FG to win it 34-32 , that crappy 3rd down play came down to haunt us, just my 2cent.
Posted by Portcityblues
Member since Jan 2017
1888 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:06 pm to
I saw one report that said that they lined up to go for 2 as they knew we only had one timeout left at the time. They didn't think we would use last timeout there and we would have more of a field goal block lineup in the game. Also, they really felt if they went for one and went went down and scored that we would go for 2 to win. so they lined up for it and then with us jumping it just solidified them going for it
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
13028 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

That was an absolutely moronic call by them, even though it worked in their favor...it was stupid. Too many things to go wrong possibly.


It was a brilliant call. At worst they are still up 6 with 6 minutes left, so even if LSU put together a go ahead TD drive, ole miss would still have time to get a game winning fg with a great qb and great kicker. If they’d been up 7, kiffin would certainly have gone for 2 on the road anyway.
And at best they go up 8 and pretty much end the game right there.
Certainly was worth trying to get an off sides penalty in that environment and that situation. They might would have kicked it if we didn’t jump offsides. So nothing hurt trying it and as mentioned earlier seeing what kind of defense we would put out there for 2pt.
This post was edited on 9/22/26 at 12:09 pm
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
62006 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:08 pm to
quote:


I think they outcoached us in the game.
definitely outcoached our defense in the first half

It is clear that lot of our offensive deficiencies were not scheme or attack related but personel related. Weis and Kiffin had a pretty good offensive game plan I thought. Leavitt needs to be better, I am not sure what we can do about the o-line on pass blocking, I just know it cant be nothing
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47709 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Them getting 2 there definitely changed our last drive strategy



Explain to me like I'm a liberal woman how needing a TD + 1 is strategically different than needing a TD +2 on that last drive?
Posted by cajuntiger85
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2017
701 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I figured they thought Lane would go for 2 if we scored the next drive, so they were just beating him to the punch.


with the way trinidad was moving the ball against us, and with their kicker who is legit from 55, i'd have made the move too bc if they miss the 2 point or if LSU gets the 2, they only have to get the ball to the 40 for their kicker to have a good chance to end it.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
13028 posts
Posted on 9/22/26 at 12:12 pm to
I thought it was a well coached game on both sides. Ole miss was certainly prepared and played well while LSU missed a lot of opportunities because we didn’t execute. We had recievers open multiple times and couldnt connect. Had chambliss bottled up multiple times and he made some incredible throws. That’s not on the coaches.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram