re: DA's office investigating alleged 2025 rape involving LSU football player, student

quote:

---

Dude you are a troll and dont even know if it is legit. Could very well be someone after $$, as usual.

---

That's exactly right. Nobody knows any of that yet and so it's pretty fricking insensitive to talk about it on message boards and throwing out comments like "Oh, Sankey would be all over this"

Well we have one side of the story currently. If shankin did indeed do it he should be locked up.

If he didn’t then it’s more of a Trevor Bauer situation.

From the outside it looks like she filed a complaint, won the original, then lost on appeal, and then instead of going back to the cops went to social media.

quote:

---

Not a good look at all.

---

Really? Thank God you are hear to clear that up for us.

I was debating this. "Football player allegedly rapes girl. Good look? Or not good look?" I was on the fence, but you convinced me.

"Not a good look" has to be the laziest, most worn out Twitter catchphrase ever. Be better.

What is this title 9 stuff? Like school court? I don’t understand how a rape charge isn’t a criminal matter or am I reading it completely wrong?

I'm very confused, I don't have tiktok and I'm not downloading it. Can someone explain like Im retarded what's happening here

quote:

---

He's guilty of sexual assault from some school judicial system and his punishment is suspension from the team?

---

I was under the impression he was cleared by the school's investigation but was booted from the team because there were some ongoing issues with the case (like what we see now). But I am not certain.

quote:

---

What is this title 9 stuff? Like school court?

---

It's a bullshite kangaroo court.

So I looked it up, it’s title ix because it involves two students. According to google, which we are seeing here the accuser can go title ix school side, the city, both or none.

It also does say title ix, works on a lower standard for a guilty so logically if someone is cleared of title ix wrong doing it will be less likely that a city would be successful in criminal charges.

It’s essentially title ix because it’s two students, one who happens to be an athlete and title ix protects against sex based discrimination which SA would fall under.

So end of the day title ix moves quicker does different things requires less evidence or at least standard for guilty vs the DA office. She could have chosen to do both at the same time.


We have one side of the story here, hers which upon appeal lost.

Verge is probably smarter than getting his hand caught in the cookie jar twice, so I highly doubt after finally getting the top job he decided to put his thumb on the scale and try to sway it, especially for what could be a de that hasn’t done anything on the field.

It looks like LSU did what it was suppose to do, they took the report, someone missed team activities while suspended, appeal went through and was allowed back.

quote:

---

I like that you're more concerned with the program than the girl getting justice.

Wonder if your reaction would be different it was your daughter, sister, niece etc.

Some things are bigger than football.

---

That's a bit of a mental stretch for you to take my post and just assume I don't care about the alleged victim. If this is real, whoever is guilty should be punished to the maximum extent of the law in my opinion. I think every logical human being would agree with that. I was just expressing my hope that LSU didn't have a role in pushing this under the rug. Last thing we need is another Les Miles type of scandal.

quote:

---

At no point in his post, did he suggest that he did not want the girl to get justice. He did NOT type that he wanted the alleged perpetrator to be let go, receive reduced punishment, or receive any preferential treatment.

He merely typed that he wanted LSU to be no part of it.

---

Yeah, but he forgot to virtue signal to us all that he is not ok with rape. That is not ok, yall.