
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cornell Frat Case
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:39 am
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:39 am
CNN
How many men (eg justice kav) have had their lives ruined bc the college slut got too drunk and later regrets it.
When is the metoo harpy brigade going to finally die off
In fact, based on her own carefully worded testimony it sounds more like she was the one who raped the guys considering they were so blown out they couldnt even keep it up.
Nasty woman
quote:
Van Houten acknowledged that the text message screen shots between the men “were completely vulgar and disgusting, but they had nothing to do with her consent.”
How many men (eg justice kav) have had their lives ruined bc the college slut got too drunk and later regrets it.
When is the metoo harpy brigade going to finally die off
In fact, based on her own carefully worded testimony it sounds more like she was the one who raped the guys considering they were so blown out they couldnt even keep it up.
quote:
The three engaged in a “threesome” involving oral and vaginal sex in a room of the fraternity. At the start of the threesome, Jane Doe described her intoxication level as “5 or 6 out of 10” and that she was “pretty ok with having this threesome.” The sexual conduct ended when Jane Doe “noticed that [Male Number 1] appeared really sleepy and was no longer fully erect.” She told Male Number 2 “[they] needed to stop having sex in order to make sure [Male Number 1] was ok. [Male Number 2] then stopped having sex with [Jane Doe].”
quote:
“[Male Number 2] began to dry heave as if he was going to vomit. Jane Doe “began to take care of [Male Number 2] by patting his back while also waking [Male Number 1] every few minutes to make sure he was okay.” Jane Doe “was consoling [Male Number 2] on the couch and telling him that it was ok if he needed to vomit. [Male Number 2] told [Jane Doe] he was pretty sure he wasn’t going to vomit. Eventually, [Jane Doe and Male Number 2] would start making out for a very short amount of time.”
Nasty woman
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:48 am to NotPrepared
This is a Clancy case all over again with mob mentality and low IQ retards.
One of the guys (apparently) just got let go from Wells Fargo due to the mob and a couple other of the 7 have had their employers and or schools contacted. One dude is in med school there.
FWIW I have no idea if these guys are guilty or not but the evidence we do see isn't a good look for any of them.
One of the guys (apparently) just got let go from Wells Fargo due to the mob and a couple other of the 7 have had their employers and or schools contacted. One dude is in med school there.
FWIW I have no idea if these guys are guilty or not but the evidence we do see isn't a good look for any of them.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:00 am to idlewatcher
"Are you gonna vomit ?"
"No."
Proceeds to make out

"No."
Proceeds to make out
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:10 am to NotPrepared
From the OP link:
quote:
The district attorney said the initial report Jane Doe made to university police differs significantly from the allegations in the lawsuit.
quote:
Nothing in Doe’s original statement indicated she was drugged without consent or had sex against her will, Van Houten said. According to the accuser’s statement, “each time Jane Doe asked to stop the sexual conduct, the sexual conduct stopped.”
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:16 am to NotPrepared
I just found out about this case yesterday. Anyone have a good link to the facts?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:18 am to medium_okra
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:19 am to NotPrepared
Daddy’s little girl was so concerned about the one guy being so drunk he was losing his stiffy… ok. And? What’s the case here?
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 8:20 am
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:34 am to SouthEasternKaiju
It’s highly likely that an empowered boss babe college girl got her freak on with an entire fraternity, and afterwards, maybe after attending a fight the patriarchy rally, decided her victim card had fewer punches than her empowered sisters, and so she decided to retcon her previous sexcapade from a proud moment to a victim moment.
Just imagine how many victim points she can earn to bring down a whole fraternity of villainous patriarchal white dudes!
Just imagine how many victim points she can earn to bring down a whole fraternity of villainous patriarchal white dudes!
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:37 am to NotPrepared
The only people I see talking about this case online are the people who are always perpetually outraged about the current media thing. This leads me to being extremely skeptical.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:45 am to NotPrepared
This is the sad result of young men growing up with unlimited free porn available 24/7 on their phones and computers.
In the real world:
MWM = gross
WMW = awesome
In the real world:
MWM = gross
WMW = awesome
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:54 am to soonerinlOUisiana
i posted this on the OT thread on this topic:
if these guys really did what they're accused of then frick em, but it really seems like there's a lot more to this story. not that that matters to the mob.
quote:
it seems like almost anytime there is universal screaming outrage and pitchforks across the internet we soon find out we dont have the whole story.
multiple conservative social media pages are tripping over themselves and each other trying to be the one to display the most outrage and indignation at this case. very similar to the immediate surge of outrage against Derek Chauvin and outpouring of support for George Floyd. it all feels very manufactured and performative.
if these guys really did what they're accused of then frick em, but it really seems like there's a lot more to this story. not that that matters to the mob.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:58 am to Sam Quint
quote:
if these guys really did what they're accused of then frick em, but it really seems like there's a lot more to this story. not that that matters to the mob.
It's pretty sad to see on social media how quickly many women have jumped all aboard on the man hating train without all of the facts. Not saying these guys are guilty or that they're not guilty but we certainly should let the facts come out before making any determinations. Of course, many won't though.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:02 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
It's pretty sad to see on social media how quickly many women have jumped all aboard on the man hating train without all of the facts. Not saying these guys are guilty or that they're not guilty but we certainly should let the facts come out before making any determinations. Of course, many won't though.
a large chunk of what i've seen have been conservative pages that really came out aggressively against Lindsay Clancy that are now coming out over the top against these guys, almost as if they are just trying to show how fair they are (which is of course exactly what they are doing).
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:02 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
It's pretty sad to see on social media how quickly many women have jumped all aboard on the man hating train without all of the facts. Not saying these guys are guilty or that they're not guilty but we certainly should let the facts come out before making any determinations. Of course, many won't though.
Wouldn’t you argue here that some men are doing the complete opposite of that?
Like, if she was raped, some of the comments in this thread are absolutely despicable.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:07 am to NotPrepared
You don’t have all of the facts, but I know they won’t affect your argument…
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:09 am to Dawgsontop34
quote:
Wouldn’t you argue here that some men are doing the complete opposite of that?
Like, if she was raped, some of the comments in this thread are absolutely despicable.
I think there's a ton on nuance that has to be sorted out before a determination can be made. For example, if it's true that she was having a threesome with a guy that got so drunk he lost an erection and was physically ill, does that mean she technically raped him as well?
What do we make of the statement originally made by Jane Doe that seemed to indicate that she was aware of what was going on?
Even the "free pussy" text doesn't prove or disprove consent. Does it look bad and is it just flat gross? Absolutely. But it doesn't prove that she wasn't aware of what was going on.
There's a ton to dig into here and frankly, nobody should be making definitive statements at this point because the facts are so muddy.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:10 am to VOR
quote:
You don’t have all of the facts, but I know they won’t affect your argument…
The other side doesn't have facts either.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:13 am to NotPrepared
quote:
How many men (eg justice kav) have had their lives ruined bc the college slut got too drunk and later regrets it.
It was worse with Kavanaugh; he was a 16 year old HS student when the fictitious event happened in Ms. Ford's mind.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:13 am to NotPrepared
"wait I can get paid for sex?"

Popular
Back to top


12













