Started By
Message

re: Cornell Frat Case

Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:33 am to
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
67355 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Almost. Didn’t this time. You sound like a frickin idiot

You sound like you're wired on meth or something and you're super mad.

Did you get arse-raped in college? How delightful.
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
9797 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:34 am to
quote:


It introduces doubt that she was aware of everything going on…

how?

quote:

And it gives the appearance of random dudes strolling up to take advantage of the situation.

no doubt they were. that is also not evidence of a lack of consent.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99720 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:35 am to
Yea this will go over well for her

quote:

Nothing in Doe’s original statement indicated she was drugged without consent or had sex against her will, Van Houten said. According to the accuser’s statement, “each time Jane Doe asked to stop the sexual conduct, the sexual conduct stopped.”
Posted by NC_Tigah
Ray Bans for Max Polarization
Member since Sep 2003
141395 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:39 am to
quote:

You do realize 7 or more men started in on this girl right?
Is there evidence of that? At least one claims to have walked in and then left without touching her.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
118034 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Maybe they should not have run a train on her, and used snapchat to advertise it. I bet the prosecutor will supoena every one's snapchat accounts, and cell phone records


I bet they will.

And I bet the defense subpoenas all hers as well.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60721 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:40 am to
quote:

You are obviously a frickin incel that blames women for everything.

Not everything is their fault but they do exacerbate society’s problems
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
15487 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:43 am to
Well I read more into it.
She got hammered, went to the frat house and did ketamine. Then started fricking a couple dudes. Then the Snapchat shite happened.

This case seems to have a lot of unknowns at the moment. Don’t know if anything will ever come out of it.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
13737 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:46 am to
That’s what I’m saying. Lots of unknowns.

And l don’t know how being that impaired would impact your ability to consent, legally.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
130001 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:48 am to
quote:

It doesn't matter if 100 guys walked into that room and had sex with that girl. That's not the question at hand here. The question is one of awareness and consent to the encounter. It's not illegal for 7 guys or 1000 guys to have sex with a woman if she consents to it. Gross, disgusting, sad? All of the above, yes. Not neccesarily illegal though.


If you’re participating in a train, I’m in favor of you being locked up. Even with consent.

Not sorry.
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
6937 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Yea this will go over well for her quote:Nothing in Doe’s original statement indicated she was drugged without consent or had sex against her will, Van Houten said. According to the accuser’s statement, “each time Jane Doe asked to stop the sexual conduct, the sexual conduct stopped.”



Oh boy.
Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
6937 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:50 am to


quote:

If you’re participating in a train, I’m in favor of you being locked up. Even with consent.



For what crime?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Ray Bans for Max Polarization
Member since Sep 2003
141395 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Maybe they should not have run a train on her
Maybe not. We'll see what the evidence shows. The problem is, if this thing hinges on consent (I've heard no claims she was 'assaulted' after resisting/refusing contact), the first two dudes were incapable of consent. She was not. So what is to be made of that?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
130001 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

whole lotta maybes to destroy the lives of 7 guys.


No sympathy. Participate in stupid shite, get caught up in serious shite.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
130001 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

For what crime?


Being a piece of shite.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Ray Bans for Max Polarization
Member since Sep 2003
141395 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:52 am to
quote:

If you’re participating in a train, I’m in favor of you being locked up. Even with consent.
Given that standard, lot's of folks in the Adult Film industry would be in jail.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
130001 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:53 am to
Don’t try to convince me even harder.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Ray Bans for Max Polarization
Member since Sep 2003
141395 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Participate in stupid shite
Are you counting her as a "participant"?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
130001 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:53 am to
If she was, yes.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99720 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Oh boy.



Just wait until they no-bill this case Then the fireworks will really start.
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
18689 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 11:11 am to
quote:

If you’re participating in a train, I’m in favor of you being locked up. Even with consent. Not sorry.
Jokes on you for thinking we’re asking for forgiveness
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram