
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:46 am to blueboy
quote:
This almost always works in favor of the accuser
Almost. Didn’t this time. You sound like a frickin idiot
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:47 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
But you'll call the guys rapists
Yep. Opinions and shite.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:47 am to NoEmpathy
quote:
NoEmpathy
Are you on drugs? The back and forth between positions you're taking is wild
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:48 am to JiminyCricket
You realize this is a message board right? Where opinions are expressed. You stupid or something?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:49 am to NoEmpathy
quote:
You realize this is a message board right? Where opinions are expressed. You stupid or something?
Listen here, sheriff woody, you're the one who was in here trying to police everyone else. Don't backpedal now because you can't debate for shite.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:50 am to NoEmpathy
quote:
Fair enough
And I get your stance. I do. But at the end of the day, she has conflicting narratives that are 180 degrees so until we actually know what happened, it's all speculation.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:56 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
Don't backpedal now because you can't debate for shite
Not backpedaling dumbass. Literally expressing MY opinion. And calling out OP. But hey, whatever you need to tell yourself
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:56 am to idlewatcher
quote:
And I get your stance. I do. But at the end of the day, she has conflicting narratives that are 180 degrees so until we actually know what happened, it's all speculation.
100%.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:59 am to NoEmpathy
quote:Do you think she was lying in her first statements or was she lying in her recent ones. Because the two are at odds.
Imagine a homicide on LSU’s campus and University police are the investigators. Ridiculous
Based on her initial statement, were the men capable of providing consent? Was there ANY indication of actions taken against her will?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:59 am to NoEmpathy
quote:
Not backpedaling dumbass. Literally expressing MY opinion. And calling out OP. But hey, whatever you need to tell yourself
You 1000% changed your stance after you attacked me and I cooked you in response. There's receipts of this for all to see.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:59 am to Sam Quint
You think Madison Brooks, heavily drunk, was raped or not? Was she in her right mind to give consent. Was it okay to dump her out on that dark highway?
I can understand alcohol being at a frat house, but the ketamine.
I can understand alcohol being at a frat house, but the ketamine.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:00 am to America250
quote:
You think Madison Brooks, heavily drunk, was raped or not? Was she in her right mind to give consent. Was it okay to dump her out on that dark highway?
Whether Madison Brooks was of sober mind at the time has absolutely zero to do with whether Jane Doe in this case was or was not at the time of the incident.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 10:01 am
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:03 am to Jimbeaux
quote:
Just imagine how many victim points she can earn to bring down a whole fraternity of villainous patriarchal white dudes!
And one of them is named Van Houton!!!!!
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:03 am to udtiger
Ketamine causes amnesia. Maybe she couldn't recall much right after the incident.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:04 am to America250
quote:
Ketamine causes amnesia. Maybe she couldn't recall much right after the incident.
Is it confirmed that she was given ketamine or is that just part of her statement?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:05 am to JiminyCricket
Both women were either capable or not capable of giving consent. So which is it?
Answer the damn question.
Answer the damn question.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:07 am to NoEmpathy
quote:
And you have proof she consented to all 7? That’s what I thought. Retard
It's not the job of the defense to prove consent. It's the job of the prosecution to prove she didn't.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 10:14 am
Posted on 9/29/26 at 10:10 am to America250
quote:
Both women were either capable or not capable of giving consent. So which is it?
Answer the damn question.
The two cases have no bearing on each other though. They could've taken drank different amounts. Perhaps they are of different size and weight so the amount impacted them differently. Maybe they took different substances. Maybe one drank a lower ABV drink as opposed to the other. That was my point, the Madison Brooks case doesn't automatically dictate the facts of this Jane Doe case.
I would ask this question so that we are speaking on like terms, what degree of impairment is the line between a person being responsible and not responsible for their actions?
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 10:12 am

Popular
Back to top



1







