- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
April 8 - all of this might unravel and recruits will end up having to make choices
Posted on 11/22/24 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 11/22/24 at 12:29 pm
That's the court ruling on revenue share and pay for play.
It could put caps on everything and undo some of these huge deals we are seeing right now.
Could be absolutely huge for LSU and schools like us that are limited on funds.
It could put caps on everything and undo some of these huge deals we are seeing right now.
Could be absolutely huge for LSU and schools like us that are limited on funds.
10
Posted on 11/22/24 at 12:37 pm to Ebridg3
I have little to no trust in the judicial system to make a decision that will be beneficial for the health of the sport.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 12:42 pm to Ebridg3
quote:
It could put caps on everything and undo some of these huge deals we are seeing right now.
The cap will be on revenue sharing. The number being floated out right now is 22% of revenue can go towards players.
NIL is something completely different. The courts already ruled that you cannot deny players ability to profit off of their NIL (autographs, product endorsements, advertisement appearances, etc). I don't see how you can cap that. The NBA and NFL doesn't tell their players they can't sign any deals with Nike, Adidas, etc for more than a certain number, they're not allowed to. The NCAA or whatever governing body college football has going forward will not be able to either by law. They can only set a cap or a luxury tax for the salary that the team pays them directly. NIL is not going away and cannot be capped.
This post was edited on 11/22/24 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 11/22/24 at 12:45 pm to Ebridg3
You’re wrong.
Revenue sharing will have a cap but NIL cannot be capped. Recruits will take that to court and win every time
Revenue sharing will have a cap but NIL cannot be capped. Recruits will take that to court and win every time
This post was edited on 11/22/24 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 11/22/24 at 12:46 pm to Ebridg3
quote:
LSU and schools like us that are limited on funds.
Today I learned that some people think lsu is limited on funds.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 1:09 pm to Ebridg3
quote:
Could be absolutely huge for LSU and schools like us that are limited on funds.
LSU isn’t limited on funds. Where did this narrative start?
Posted on 11/22/24 at 1:11 pm to Jack Daniel
NIL is one thing , boosters with deep pockets outright paying a kid millions to go to their Alana is something else
Posted on 11/22/24 at 1:26 pm to Septiger
Exactly, the whole reason we’re having this conversation at the moment is because a recruit was paid a lump sum of money upfront by a billionaire donor. Revenue sharing will hopefully put a limit on that.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 1:51 pm to reauxl tigers
quote:
have little to no trust in the judicial system to make a decision that will be beneficial for the health of the sport.
Well it you have no faith in the judicial system, what’s the solution, because it’s a cluster frick now
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:00 pm to Septiger
quote:
NIL is one thing , boosters with deep pockets outright paying a kid millions to go to their Alana is something else
Are you operating under the assumption I cannot just walk up to someone and hand them money?
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:24 pm to Jcorye1
The court never said nil could not have some reasonable regulations
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:38 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
The court never said nil could not have some reasonable regulations
I guess I'm just failing to understand how those regulations are supposed to be legal? The only reason sports leagues are able to have capped salaries is because they collectively bargain.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:46 pm to Ebridg3
NIL isn't going away when rev share comes along. These guys will have even more money now.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 2:59 pm to Ebridg3
quote:It’s amazing how many people have a fundamental misunderstanding of what is actually going on, why it was always going to turn out this way, and why there is very little (if anything) that can be done about it.
It could put caps on everything and undo some of these huge deals we are seeing right now.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:08 pm to Ebridg3
The courts cannot legitimately say that an individual (portnoy, knight, etc…) cannot give their money to a kid.
It’s unwinnable.
It’s unwinnable.
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:11 pm to Ebridg3
The escalation is by design my friend
Posted on 11/22/24 at 3:12 pm to Ebridg3
I hadn’t been on campus in a long time until a few months ago. If you aren’t noseblind to it it’s very obvious LSU has money, especially compared to years ago.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News