
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AP Top 25 Poll Results From Saturday Night.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 6:56 am to DamnStrong
Posted on 11/1/26 at 6:56 am to DamnStrong
Some of those winners eeked out wins against unranked opponents.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 7:05 am to ScootiniTiger
quote:
Bring back the BCS
The BCS was horrible and produced more arguments. It should be settled on the field.
Now we just have to argue about who the 11 or 12 seed should be and those aren’t going to be real championship contenders anyway. Remember it’s REALLY about finding the champion.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 7:21 am to lsusteve1
quote:
ND, IU, Miami, BYU, Texas, are all meh
Add Utah. They now have two wins against teams with winning records, powerhouses Houston and Cincinnati.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 7:52 am to thetempleowl
They played a broken m state team
Posted on 11/1/26 at 7:54 am to Lsuray70443
quote:
Texas had 13 first downs and 220 yards vs the state defense.
Texas loses if Kamario Taylor wasnt hurt.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 8:11 am to hsgeoboy
quote:that's because two-thirds of the BCS formula was the human polls. The BCS wasn't like the RPI for basketball, which factors in a lot of real metrics.
I still use the BCS rankings on X as a reference. They unfortunately usually map pretty well to the polls tho
Voter polls are garbage and irrelevant. Ignore them.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 8:36 am to DamnStrong
Ohio State won’t drop that much. Might even drop us a spot to benefit them
Posted on 11/1/26 at 8:49 am to Lsuray70443
quote:
Texas had 13 first downs and 220 yards vs the state defense.
They had 220 passing yards and 280 total. Still not impressive. The stat that jumped out to me was 5 sacks allowed. Arch is going to have a rough time in Tiger Stadium.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 9:12 am to atxfan
quote:
Arch is going to have a rough time in Tiger Stadium.

Posted on 11/1/26 at 9:38 am to DamnStrong
Where will Ohio State fall to?
I bet 10
I bet 10
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:10 am to thetempleowl
quote:
Texas looked solid today.
We must have not watched the same game
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:32 am to moock blackjack
quote:
Where will Ohio State fall to?
I bet 10
I'm not sure where they end up with Sayin out.
The IU win is propping up their resume, but they were a footstep away from losing that game, and IU's offense hasn't looked good for weeks. At the same time, the Buckeyes will still likely win out and reach the B1G Championship Game.
I'm curious what the CFP committee does with them if they truly care about injuries
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:33 am to moock blackjack
With no Sayin and how they left FSU out, outside the top 12.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:34 am to mdomingue
I've always been skeptical because it always lines up with the committee. Now if that's truly how it is then sure. I just have my doubts on what the committee actually does and it being objectively effective.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:35 am to DamnStrong
Do not see anything that will help us here.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:51 am to USAFTiger42
quote:
I've always been skeptical because it always lines up with the committee. Now if that's truly how it is then sure. I just have my doubts on what the committee actually does and it being objectively effective.
The BCS was never purely objective because it uses polls and metrics set up by humans who have biases. It's just more objective because it doesn't shift the parameters as the season plays out, as we tend to do as humans. The committee uses a lot of the same more objective data. I think that is why they almost always line up so well.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 12:31 pm to mdomingue
quote:
The committee uses a lot of the same more objective data. I think that is why they almost always line up so well.
Exactly. The committee has always claimed they don't use the polls or computers, which is probably technically true, but they're still interpreting the same data points that would be plugged into a BCS formula.
If anything, the rankings lining up should be an argument for why the BCS was fine and shouldn't have been scrapped.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 12:52 pm to nvasil1
quote:
If anything, the rankings lining up should be an argument for why the BCS was fine and shouldn't have been scrapped.
I would say use the BCS as the selector in a multi-team playoff format.

Popular
Back to top


0








