Started By
Message

re: I never saw the ball hit the ground or move

Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
Posted by baytiger11
Member since Jul 2020
2720 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
It touched a blade of grass. Didn’t bounce. He had control the whole time. Mfs are blind
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
75190 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
Hand was underneath the ball. No ground
Posted by BengalShark
Member since Jul 2017
4677 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
Probably hit ground but if that’s Kentucky they call it inconclusive evidence and give them catch
Posted by Lgrnwd
Member since Jan 2018
9203 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
It did, but didn’t move much. Tricky tack overturn. Not enough to overturn IMO
Posted by PotatoChip
Member since May 2014
5469 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
Hit the ground but didn’t move. Had his hand around it. Didn’t matter though, they knew when they rushed the review what the call would be
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
17294 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

definitely hit the ground


Which is 100% okay. The refs misapplied the rule.
Posted by BallChamp00
Member since May 2015
7789 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
Except the ball completely changed arms lol
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
88371 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

I never saw the ball hit the ground
Yes you did
Posted by jasonbr1975
Lafayette, LA
Member since Sep 2024
2843 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:38 pm to
Clearly hit the ground and was not a catch
Posted by TigerDCC11
Member since May 2007
3952 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:38 pm to
every catch like that will force "some' part of the ball to hit the ground. It is how you interpret the rule. What do you think the SEC will do?

You think this is bad? Wait until Basketball season when we play away. The ref's will be on steroids.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
180984 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

The refs misapplied the rule.


Really weird saints and lsu always hear some jaded arse version of a rule at times
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
17294 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Hit the ground but didn’t move. Had his hand around it. Didn’t matter though, they knew when they rushed the review what the call would be


Bingo. When the ref announced the call it was nonsensical, and not based on any rule.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
180984 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Clearly hit the ground


Clearly that means nothing
Posted by Tigrdynasty
19th hole
Member since Jun 2018
3491 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

He had control the whole time


Hahaha! He lost he ball completely as he rolled over. You have to maintain control throughout the landing to complete a catch. And the ball hit turf first so it was moot at that point anyway
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
180984 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

He lost he ball completely


You saw nothing
Posted by baytiger11
Member since Jul 2020
2720 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:41 pm to
The ball can touch grass and you still maintain control. He didn’t lose control
Posted by Lucado
Member since Nov 2023
5350 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:44 pm to
It's allowed to hit the ground as long as the receiver maintains control, which I believe he did.
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Ft. Lauderdale
Member since Jul 2005
33770 posts
Posted on 10/10/26 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

I never saw the ball hit the ground or move
that’s because you’re automatically looking for a conspiracy, so you don’t see what everybody else saw.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram