Started By
Message

re: On3: Going rate for OT/DL

Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:21 pm to
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
38591 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Interesting how businesses typically don't want the government involved in its affairs, especially its labor issues because the government will usually side with workers and order more pay and benefits.

Now we have a mega business in college football asking the government to get involved because the labor is getting too much pay and benefits and they want some sort of cap or regulation. But not regulation of the people who sit atop of the college football world. Oh no. Don't regulate their salaries and benefits. Just the players. Typical business owners BS.


You don't know what you're talking about.

Most P5 football programs depend on tax dollars to operate.

This is not any kind of private market.
Posted by LuzianaFootball
DC
Member since Dec 2008
8025 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:35 pm to
I'm torn because it's funny that Saban was handing out money well before the NIL error helping him and now he can't control recruiting anymore.

Do I want to see others take recruits away from him? Yes. But, do I want regulations? Absolutely. It just feels like regulations will bring the market back down but somehow put him in position to get back to where he was.
Posted by Dicken Nuggets
Member since Aug 2019
319 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 5:46 pm to
No one in here would complain if employers got into a bidding war over your employment. No one complains when a bidding war ensues when they put their house on the market. We don't have the government regulating coaches salaries arguing that there needs to be a cap because the poor schools can't stop the rich schools from hiring their successful coaches. But by all means let's regulate the players earnings because we can't have the laborers making what they're worth.

The players are adults by law. They should be able to make whatever someone is willing to pay them for their service/skill. Since when has that been a bad thing?
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
22687 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 6:44 pm to
They’ve ruined college football. It will eventually implode.
Posted by Dicken Nuggets
Member since Aug 2019
319 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:40 pm to
Then let it implode and then they can do it better the second time. College football too big to fail? Guess they need a government bailout too.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
31964 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 7:49 pm to
I don’t believe any NIL numbers. They’re all bullshite
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
31261 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

don’t believe any NIL numbers. They’re all bullshite


Those Numbers are coming directly from staffs involved in the negotiations.
Posted by Forever
Member since Dec 2019
6233 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

No one in here would complain if employers got into a bidding war over your employment. No one complains when a bidding war ensues when they put their house on the market. We don't have the government regulating coaches salaries arguing that there needs to be a cap because the poor schools can't stop the rich schools from hiring their successful coaches. But by all means let's regulate the players earnings because we can't have the laborers making what they're worth

There is a salary cap for almost every professional sports league though, and for good reason. The argument isn’t about players not being able to make what they’re worth, it’s about the bigger “franchises” in the game being able to pay so much that it ruins the small market franchises’ ability to stay in business and keep talent, in turn ruining the sport and putting everyone out of business.

The issue is way too complicated to compare to employers bidding on employment. I can’t decide to open up a major university and field my own football team tomorrow, this isn’t a “free market” thing. The only way professional, paid sports leagues work is with a salary cap, period.
Posted by DCtiger1
Member since Jul 2009
10162 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Interesting how businesses typically don't want the government involved in its affairs, especially its labor issues because the government will usually side with workers and support more pay and benefits. Now we have a mega business in college football asking the government to get involved because the labor is getting too much pay and benefits and they want some sort of cap or regulation. But not regulation of the people who sit atop of the college football world. Oh no. Don't regulate their salaries and benefits. Just the players. Typical business owners BS


Terrible fricking analogy. NIL is supposed to be kids getting paid for autographs and their image and likeness, so instances like Pryor getting suspended at Ohio State doesn’t happen. It was never intended to be players getting massive payouts for doing absolutely fricking nothing plus getting a college education. The amount of kids doing NIL deals like Daniel’s with Powerade are few and far between. A collective paying a player for nothing in return isn’t what NIL is, so how about just clarify it’s not NIL and it is in fact pay for play and end amateur sports once and for all
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
27713 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

No one in here would complain if employers got into a bidding war over your employment. No one complains when a bidding war ensues when they put their house on the market. We don't have the government regulating coaches salaries arguing that there needs to be a cap because the poor schools can't stop the rich schools from hiring their successful coaches. But by all means let's regulate the players earnings because we can't have the laborers making what they're worth. The players are adults by law. They should be able to make whatever someone is willing to pay them for their service/skill. Since when has that been a bad thing?


Spare us with the workers of the world unite bit. This isn’t that. Pay for play is still illegal, but that isn’t being enforced, nor is there any way to effectively do it. Combined with the portal, it’s turned the sport into a total shite show.

One of two things need to happen. One would be to make the NIL system what it was designed to be- a way for players to be paid for their ability to build their own brand using the brand of the school they choose. Strictly enforce this, and it can work.

Second, and much more painful, would be to go all the way and abandon NIL as the primary means of paying players. The P5 in football would have to leave the NCAA and Title IX’s bullshite behind and make the players employees with full pay and benefits.

The later is likely where we are heading and it’s unfortunate. This will basically kill the G5, or relegate them to FCS level and it will take away a lot of what was good about the rest of big-time college football. It will be professional football played on par with spring leagues and nowhere remotely close to the NFL.
This post was edited on 11/21/23 at 9:18 pm
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12896 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 9:17 pm to
Bryce getting the 7.6 billion canes NIL package
Posted by Dicken Nuggets
Member since Aug 2019
319 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 10:11 pm to
Why has it turned CFB into a shite show? Seems like CFB is now free market capitalism. Guys are getting paid what someone thinks they are worth. It's competition. Isn't that what we want? Can't afford to compete? Oh well. That's life. I want to live in the nicest gated community, drive the nicest vehicles, and go on vacations all the time. Guess what? I can't afford to live like that. Maybe the government should pass some regulation so I can better compete with wealthy people. Should I ask the government to level the playing field?

Seems like everyone is for capitalism until it's not working for them.

Perhaps NIL regulation would be equivalent to antitrust law. We don't allow monopolies, right? The thing is, college football is not essential to everyday life. It's entertainment. If there wasn't college football, then life would continue just fine.

So why the **** do we need our government involved in sport/entertainment? Of all the things they could be working on sports isn't one of them.

Can't wait to see our government spend time on college football NIL but can't find the time to read a proposed bill before passing it.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
31964 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

Those Numbers are coming directly from staffs involved in the negotiations.



Lol. Ok.
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
17094 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

Seems like everyone is for capitalism until it's not working for them.


Not really. i seriously doubt there are that many people that are up in arms about players finally getting a piece of the pie. My issue is with the NCAA who has been staring at this bullet for well over a decade and sat on their hands until the decision was made for them. Then they flipped the switch and ran with zero regard to how it would actually work.

NIL was supposed to be about letting the athletes make money off of their name, not about boosters dropping bags of cash outside their house a year before they get to campus. There is a difference.
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
27713 posts
Posted on 11/21/23 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

Why has it turned CFB into a shite show? Seems like CFB is now free market capitalism. Guys are getting paid what someone thinks they are worth. It's competition. Isn't that what we want? Can't afford to compete? Oh well. That's life. I want to live in the nicest gated community, drive the nicest vehicles, and go on vacations all the time. Guess what? I can't afford to live like that. Maybe the government should pass some regulation so I can better compete with wealthy people. Should I ask the government to level the playing field?


You have no idea what you are talking about. No one here is saying players shouldn’t be compensated. But the only thing the Supreme Court ruling forbade was pay for play, but that’s about 99% of what is happening now. There is no direct relationship between the two parties where money is concerned and there are no contracts. This is not the same as me working for my employer under a contract and being compensated directly by my employer for my work.

Right now, all you have is a court ruling that basically did nothing to set up a framework for NIL and different laws in every state. You can keep babbling about capitalism, but ALL US markets are restricted by laws and regulations and there are laws that govern both employers and employees. The world of NIL should be no different than any other area of federally regulated Interstate commerce.

But that brings us back to the real problem- there is no employee-employer relationship when it comes to NIL. The player and the school have a scholarship agreement, but it has nothing to do with this money. If NIL was really going to be about sponsorship agreements and player branding, then there wouldn’t be a problem. Pro athletes have all kinds of sponsorships and ad deals. But would you for one second suggest that pro athletes be paid their full salaries not by their teams, but through intermediaries and separate from their contract with the team? What kind of sense does that make? That is exactly what is happening in college football today.

I am not personally in favor of destroying the model of college football, but we would have the system you seem to believe exists in your fantasy world if we make the players employees of football programs run independently of the NCAA and the universities. That is a legitimate, legal, regulated employer-employee relationship where players will be compensated directly based on a CONTRACT. I hate what it may do to the sport, but at least this would be a legitimate system to manage pay for play.
This post was edited on 11/21/23 at 11:15 pm
Posted by tgdk11
Member since Nov 2017
1476 posts
Posted on 11/22/23 at 12:26 am to
It's not like there's some Roger Goodell just making 30 million somewhere. Kids were already getting free education, clothes, food, and 500-700/month stipend. When you have 0 expenses bc they cover every single thing for you, that's actually lot of $ for a 18 yr old kid.

There should be an issue when boosters are giving a " collective " who then turns and hands it to the kid, 100's of thousands of dollars. It's letting the rich your speaking ill of, buy players as they please like real life gambling.

I dont tbink the spirit of nil was this
Posted by RightWingTiger
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2003
5694 posts
Posted on 11/22/23 at 4:19 am to
quote:

It's time to get some regulation on NIL.

They need to make Freshman ineligible for NIL. Only players that have actually PLAYED at least 1 season of CFB can sign NIL deals.
Posted by Gene Heinous
Houbuston
Member since Sep 2021
507 posts
Posted on 11/22/23 at 5:09 am to
MLB does not have a salary cap.
Posted by Geauxldilocks
Member since Aug 2018
3939 posts
Posted on 11/22/23 at 5:22 am to
quote:

They’ve ruined college football. It will eventually implode.


Yet you’re still here posting and watching the games.
Posted by USAFTiger42
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2016
3423 posts
Posted on 11/22/23 at 6:53 am to
Then every team needs a salary cap through the conference TV deals. I despise boosters having to pay for something that should be regulated.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram