- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:22 pm to Alt26
Wade’s defenses have been very good since he made that change prior to his last season at LSU. Last years group at NC State was by far his worst, they were playing the same style but either couldn’t or wouldn’t play D on the level they needed to. 3 of his last 4 teams have allowed fewer than 65ppg and even at Mcneese his defenses faired really well vs opponents who overmatched his teams by a lot talent wise. Vs the 9 P5 or tourney teams he faced at Mcneese his teams held those opponents to 40.4% shooting and 71ppg. As far as what he has to work with this year, Nunez, Ugo, Niang and Dioubate are all good on ball defenders. The bigs we’ll have to wait and see but they have played at the higher levels so that’s a plus.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 5:34 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 7:59 pm to Madking
I guess we’ll wait and see what we end up trotting out there. I’m hopeful because of the 5for5 guys seemingly being eligible, but the strategy this offseason was dumb. We had a ridiculously high budget for the roster. Could’ve easily assembled a great team through legitimate portal additions. 5for5 will likely save us though. Zero chance we could roll into next year expecting good SEC caliber play from Nunez. I don’t even like Bashir or Ugo as starters. Niang will be a dude. I like Santos and Dessert as well but like Niang, they have the gray cloud over their head because of “earnings > expenses”. Luis shouldn’t be eligible but I’m sure we’ll find a way
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:05 pm to moldy_tiger
5 for 5 guys if I remember right was the plan from the start mixed with internationals. 5 for 5 didn't seem likely for a while but now its looking good again. Would not be surprised if we don't see a few of these 5 for 5 guys signing soon.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:11 pm to Tigercowboy
Yea we’ll be fine. I dont think we planned on leaning on 5for5 as much as we’re about to though
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:29 pm to moldy_tiger
Well calling it “dumb” is an opinion and you didn’t explain it so I can’t really comment on it. I can tell you that Wade is obsessed with the NBA and Euro because of the way they play offensively so it doesn’t surprise me that he’d want players who could translate that style to the college game. As far as the 5for5 ruling, from what I’ve read Santos looks like the only risky player because his clock will end right near the end of the season but they are confident he’ll get the waiver. Luis is in BR, I’m under the impression he won’t be allowed to play but we seem to be carrying on like he will. Totally disagree with your assessment of the guards, especially Bashir. You should probably go watch some video on those guys. I’d recommend the game were Bashir went head to head with 2 NBA lottery picks (Dylan Harper and Ace Bailey) and lit them up for 38 despite not having much help on his side.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:37 pm to Madking
Dumb meaning: there wasn’t a reason to gamble on eligibility as much as we are with the money we had available. Maybe it works out (probably will). And don’t get me wrong I think Bashir and Ugo can be good role players but that being your starting back court would be suicide in the SEC. Especially considering the skill sets of the guys we have signed around them
ETA: Bashir could definitely start with the right guy running the point and someone at the 3 who can guard guards. I do think Niang could be that guy
ETA: Bashir could definitely start with the right guy running the point and someone at the 3 who can guard guards. I do think Niang could be that guy
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:46 pm to moldy_tiger
Let’s just assume that an NCAA coach knows more than we do, it isn’t gambling if he knew they’d be available. And again I don’t know why you think our guards are so bad? There’s just no evidence to suggest that. Ugo is incredibly athletic, he has size and length. He played behind an All-American at Mich St. but you watch his video and he’s got plenty potential. Bashir is a scoring machine, he was hurt last year and that whole thing collapsed under Tang but again he has plenty of video vs big time competition when he’s having big games. Nunez is another high end athlete, a top 100 recruit out of HS and aggressive defensive player with size. Has some rawness on offense but he’s a backup who will defend hard and does a good job handling the ball.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 8:52 pm to Madking
I don’t disagree with any of your points about the guards because they could all end up being good. But with *reportedly* $20 million to spend I just think we should’ve gotten a guaranteed stud like a Haggerty, Juke Harris, Tounde, Isaiah Johnson type of player.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:00 pm to moldy_tiger
Maybe but Wade wanted the money for pro guys instead. Probably thinks there’s more certainty going that route.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:12 pm to Madking
It doesn't take a genius to figure out 6 months ago that these guys that just completed a 4th season would be given a 5th. Courts don't typically rule against citizens trying to make a living, especially when the lawyers can file suit somewhere that they know is sympathetic to that viewpoint.
Also, I'm not certain about this, but if you lose in one jurisdiction, can't you just refile somewhere else until you inevitably prevail?
Wade wasn't in Portsmouth for no reason, I believe he's always "known " these dudes would get a court ruling them eligible.
To any posters legitimately concerned, please point out the year to me where Wade DIDN'T put a damned strong team on the floor. Let the general cook.
Also, I'm not certain about this, but if you lose in one jurisdiction, can't you just refile somewhere else until you inevitably prevail?
Wade wasn't in Portsmouth for no reason, I believe he's always "known " these dudes would get a court ruling them eligible.
To any posters legitimately concerned, please point out the year to me where Wade DIDN'T put a damned strong team on the floor. Let the general cook.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 9:15 pm to tigahlovah
I don’t really blame anyone for the questions. News and updates are another area where college basketball, especially here, falls far short of football. The normal fan just isn’t given anywhere near enough information on any given topic as they should be.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 12:59 pm to tigahlovah
quote:
To any posters legitimately concerned, please point out the year to me where Wade DIDN'T put a damned strong team on the floor. Let the general cook.
In his head coaching stints, his first year at Chattanooga, LSU, and NC State weren't damn strong teams. Even though NC State made the tournament, they ended the regular season poorly by losing 7 of the last 10. He has had good teams in his 2nd year everywhere, but he hasn't been a slam dunk success in his first year. I don't know if he was given the resources in those previous stings, but I think current LSU boosters expect immediate success given the huge budget.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 3:12 pm to tigersham
Can someone give a cliffs of where we currently stand? Which players on the OP have been officially ruled ineligible? Which ones are still in play?
Posted on 7/15/26 at 5:44 pm to Beef Supreme
Waivers won’t be given for another week or so. Appeals start on the 31st.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 7:55 pm to Beef Supreme
Thank TigerIce who posted this about 4 pages and a week ago.
PG - Austin Nunez 6’2” 170 lbs. (UTSA)- 9.8 ppg, 2.1 reb, 2.8 ast LINK
SG - Divine Ugochukwu 6’3” 190 lbs. (Michigan State)- 5.1 ppg, 1.5 reb, 1.5 ast LINK
SG - Abdi Bashir Jr. 6’7” 190 lbs. (K-state)- 13.2 ppg, 2.2 reb, 2.3 ast LINK
SF - Saliou Niang 6’8” 205 lbs.( International / Virtus Bologna)- 7.9 ppg, 5.0 reb, 1.7 apg LINK
SF - RJ Luis Jr. 6’7” 215 lbs. (G-League Celtics)- Last year of college: 18.2 ppg, 7.2 reb, 2.0 ast LINK [PENDING LEGAL ACTION] NOT LIKELY
SF - Mo Dioubate 6’7” 220 lbs. (Kentucky)- 8.8 ppg, 5.5 reb, 1.0 ast LINK
PF - Marcio Santos 6’9” 250 lbs. ( International / Maccabi FOX Tel Aviv)- 7.3 ppg, 2.4 reb, 0.7 ast LINK
C - Brice Dessert 6’11” 255 lbs. ( International / Anadolu Efes)- 7.2 ppg, 3.0 reb, 0.5 ast LINK
C - Michael Ruzik 6’10 220 lbs. (International / Joventut Badalona)- 6.7 ppg, 3.6 reb, 0.6 ast LINK
W\F - Jordan Bender 6’8 (HS 26’ - development) Not sure if he signed or just committed*
From listening to youse guys, Luis is the lone needing clearance. So 9 on the books. Several small avenues left for CWW to fill his roster, however I assume it will be another 2 months before there’s 15.
PG - Austin Nunez 6’2” 170 lbs. (UTSA)- 9.8 ppg, 2.1 reb, 2.8 ast LINK
SG - Divine Ugochukwu 6’3” 190 lbs. (Michigan State)- 5.1 ppg, 1.5 reb, 1.5 ast LINK
SG - Abdi Bashir Jr. 6’7” 190 lbs. (K-state)- 13.2 ppg, 2.2 reb, 2.3 ast LINK
SF - Saliou Niang 6’8” 205 lbs.( International / Virtus Bologna)- 7.9 ppg, 5.0 reb, 1.7 apg LINK
SF - RJ Luis Jr. 6’7” 215 lbs. (G-League Celtics)- Last year of college: 18.2 ppg, 7.2 reb, 2.0 ast LINK [PENDING LEGAL ACTION] NOT LIKELY
SF - Mo Dioubate 6’7” 220 lbs. (Kentucky)- 8.8 ppg, 5.5 reb, 1.0 ast LINK
PF - Marcio Santos 6’9” 250 lbs. ( International / Maccabi FOX Tel Aviv)- 7.3 ppg, 2.4 reb, 0.7 ast LINK
C - Brice Dessert 6’11” 255 lbs. ( International / Anadolu Efes)- 7.2 ppg, 3.0 reb, 0.5 ast LINK
C - Michael Ruzik 6’10 220 lbs. (International / Joventut Badalona)- 6.7 ppg, 3.6 reb, 0.6 ast LINK
W\F - Jordan Bender 6’8 (HS 26’ - development) Not sure if he signed or just committed*
From listening to youse guys, Luis is the lone needing clearance. So 9 on the books. Several small avenues left for CWW to fill his roster, however I assume it will be another 2 months before there’s 15.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 8:18 am to slutiger5
All but 4 still need clearance. Luis is the only one that has doubts about being cleared
Posted on 7/16/26 at 8:40 am to Lapaz
quote:
In his head coaching stints, his first year at Chattanooga, LSU, and NC State weren't damn strong teams.
I agree. I would not refer to them as "damn strong teams".
However, I don't know if I would say this is true...
quote:
but he hasn't been a slam dunk success in his first year.
It really depends on what your definition of "success" is, but I would say every school at which he coached (except probably VCU) would say his first year was a big success relative to the state of the program when he took it over.
At UTC, LSU, McNeese, and NC State he took over a program that was coming off a losing season. At every one he immediately improved the record...by a fairly significant mark
UTC: 13-18 (8-10) before
18-15 (12-4) year one (+5 overall, +4 in conf., 2nd place conf finish)
LSU: 10-21 (2-16) before
18-15 (8-10) year one (+8 overall, +6 in conf)
McNeese: 11-23 (6-12) before
30-4 (17-1) year one (+19 overall - tied NCAA record for biggest single season turnaround, +11 in conf)
NC State: 12-19 (5-15) before
20-14 (10-8) year one (+8 overall, +5 in conf)
quote:
I think current LSU boosters expect immediate success given the huge budget.
I do too. But I don't think "success" = Final Four/NC in terms of expectations. I don't think most booster expect a Sweet 16 appearance in year 1. I think the general expectation for "success" in year 1 is an NCAA Tournament appearance with 1-2 wins.
LSU was 15-17 (3-15) last season. It's 3rd losing season in 4 years. If the trends above hold, then it's not unreasonable to think LSU could move to a record of something like 22-10 (9-9)
If that happens I don't think you will see any boosters, nor fans bitching. The only ones who will complain are the handful that aren't really LSU basketball fans. Just people who hate Wade personally and want him to fail to satisfy their own self-interests (which best I can tell is anonymous message board cred)
That kind of record would not be the ultimate goal for the program. But it would represent success in the eyes of most. For context, LSU was 21-10 (9-9) in Wade's final season. That was good enough for a 6 seed in the NCAA Tournament. If you told LSU fans today that LSU was going to be a 6 seed in the NCAA Tournament this season and win a game or two in the tournament, most would take it.
This post was edited on 7/16/26 at 8:43 am
Posted on 7/16/26 at 9:14 am to Alt26
I think that must e the first post by Alt26bthat is rational, I agree with, and upvoted. I hope this is the real Alt
Posted on 7/16/26 at 11:33 am to Tigershine
How secure is Dessert as far as gaining eligibility. I know Kansas tried to secure him last year but then backed off because they didn't think he would be able to get eligibility. He is a huge piece and I really hope he will be good to go.
Popular
Back to top



0


