- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Beef Supreme
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2329 |
| Registered on: | 4/22/2008 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: You Moon landing deniers are all complete idiots...
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/23/25 at 12:03 am to STLDawg
quote:
The leadership of the Soviet Union was looking for a way out of the space race. It was bankrupting their nation. That’s why they didn’t call the US bluff with the fake landing.
Their official stance at the time of the moon landing was denial that they were even in a space race with America and weren't trying to get to the moon! This was their official stance until 1989.
In 2020 the then head of Russia's equivalent to Nasa, Roscosmos, publicly doubted the moon landing numerous times. His replacement however has reaffirmed that Russia recognizes that we went to the moon.
re: You Moon landing deniers are all complete idiots...
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/22/25 at 8:54 am to TigerGman
quote:
Your "rebuttable" is pathetic. And only shows how clueless you are.
A lot of people resort to trying to shut down arguments with insults when they lack the ability to support their side with substance.
Again, I appreciate the people on here who are not moon landing deniers who can actually address the skeptics points with reasonable debate.
re: You Moon landing deniers are all complete idiots...
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/22/25 at 8:40 am to Enadious
quote:
No, other governments had craft that verified with photos. Are they part of the conspiracy, too? Wouldn't China or Russia delight in calling us frauds?
I'm aware of other governments like India stating that they can view the landing sites. The example I used was someone specifically saying we can see footprints. From my quick googling here this morning I can only find evidence of that from Nasa's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter which got low enough in 2010 to capture trails of footprints. From what I can see those are the only images that were used as the basis of the "we can see footprints" argument that always comes up.
My point was not that there arent footprints on the moon it was a rebuttal to notion that people who "accept facts" are better thinkers than those who question them and look further.
re: You Moon landing deniers are all complete idiots...
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/22/25 at 8:14 am to N2cars
quote:
If you need a gun put to your head to believe we landed on the moon, you need to read a book or three.
It's a figure of speech, bud. No reason to have it trigger you into a smart arse response.
quote:
Skepticism is one thing, but to be unable to accept facts, from multiple resources, would make me question your ability to think.
I understand your point but I would say most of those who simply "accept facts" aren't really the ones doing the thinking and research here. As an example, someone on this thread stated something to the effect of "we can literally see footprints on the moon". A skeptic would look into that "fact" and discover the only way we can see that is from satellites orbiting the moon, owned by the same government agency the skeptic is questioning the honesty of in the first place. Of course there comes a point where a certain level of skepticism is crazy - flat earth is a great example.
re: You Moon landing deniers are all complete idiots...
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/22/25 at 7:51 am to TigerGman
I dont understand why the fact that people are skeptical upsets so many people to such a degree. To me the unhinged people on this thread are the ones saying how stupid everyone is, they shouldnt be allowed to vote, and need to get re-educated in training camps.
I appreciate the ones who give actual rebuttals to the skeptics points. I cant wrap my head around someone not at least acknowledging that there is room for skepticism. Skepticism does not equal denial.
Gun to my head, i would say we landed on the moon. But it does bother me that it is the only achievement in the history of exploration (that I am aware of) that we were the only ones to ever do, have never gone back, have never aspired to reach further, and despite advancements in technology we say we cant yet repeat. Also its the only thing I can think of that a reason we stopped doing is bc it was too expensive. We still build rockets. We now have a space station that is shared by multiple countries. We still send people into space. Technology has advanced everywhere and continues to do so making technological parts and components of the past cheaper to make and gain access to.
I appreciate the ones who give actual rebuttals to the skeptics points. I cant wrap my head around someone not at least acknowledging that there is room for skepticism. Skepticism does not equal denial.
Gun to my head, i would say we landed on the moon. But it does bother me that it is the only achievement in the history of exploration (that I am aware of) that we were the only ones to ever do, have never gone back, have never aspired to reach further, and despite advancements in technology we say we cant yet repeat. Also its the only thing I can think of that a reason we stopped doing is bc it was too expensive. We still build rockets. We now have a space station that is shared by multiple countries. We still send people into space. Technology has advanced everywhere and continues to do so making technological parts and components of the past cheaper to make and gain access to.
re: I think I want Ole Miss to lose vs Tulane
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/16/25 at 11:56 pm to thelawnwranglers
You think???
Roll Wave baby.
Roll Wave baby.
re: We havent developed a RB since 2015.
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/16/25 at 11:55 pm to BadatBourre
According to 247 Frank is credited with recruiting the following RBs:
Fournette
Berry
Guice
Durham
Kenny Hilliard
JT Lindsay
Kaleb Jackson
Nick Brosette
Trey Holly
Darrel Williams
Jeremy Hill
Alfred Blue
Terrence Magee
Lanard Fournette
Fournette
Berry
Guice
Durham
Kenny Hilliard
JT Lindsay
Kaleb Jackson
Nick Brosette
Trey Holly
Darrel Williams
Jeremy Hill
Alfred Blue
Terrence Magee
Lanard Fournette
re: We havent developed a RB since 2015.
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/16/25 at 11:42 pm to BadatBourre
quote:
Have you realized that Frank was going .500 or below at UTSA while both CEH and Guice were committing to LSU?
Guice signed with LSU in 2015. Wilson officially accepted the UTSA job in 2016. Guice was recruited and played his freshman year with Frank as his coach.
re: Most recently published LSU sports financials
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/13/25 at 5:37 pm to bigbonvi
quote:
Kinda surprised me.
TV deals.
re: Had an appointment in Lafayette the other day
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/12/25 at 6:52 am to Odysseus32
quote:
I will add, I've also never seen a more poorly laid out city.
Been saying this for a long time. The entire city is south of the interstate. Everything is surface streets and stop lights. There's no quick way to gst anywhere. Its awful for a city that size.
re: @ Kentucky October 10! Best time of the year for the Bourbon Trail!
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/11/25 at 7:56 pm to Tdubs7
Last time LSU went it was one of the funnest away trips ive ever done. Keeneland was fantastic.
re: Explain the reasoning behind why some guys spend money on OnlyFans?
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/9/25 at 4:22 pm to dukke v
quote:
Explain why they also go to strip clubs just to watch women shake their shite…. And give her money to do it….
This one is way easier to explain.
re: Sounds like Kiffin was being considered for LSU job for THIS season
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/9/25 at 4:02 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Hey a-hole, buy a calendar. He said "LAST YEAR", dummy!
You should probably slow down on throwing names like dummy around.
re: Sounds like Kiffin was being considered for LSU job for THIS season
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/9/25 at 4:00 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Orgeron said "last year" so I guess the other poster needs to buy a calendar
He didn't misspeak; the article is just written poorly. In one paragraph he is discussing Lane calling him for a different job last year and in the next he is discussing the LSU opening this year. You just have to comprehend it a little better. When discussing the job last year he said he told Lane he wasn't ready to go back to coaching when Lane asked. Then in the next paragraph when discussing the LSU job he said Lane never asked even though he said Lane knew he was planning on going back and coaching.
re: Frank Wilson says he’s received no clarity on his future with LSU
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/9/25 at 11:34 am to LSULaw2009
quote:
Those discussions are ongoing, but right now I'm focused on making sure we are ready and focused for the Texas Bowl and the Houston Cougars.
Good reply. And as it turns out thats pretty much what he said:
quote:
"We've had conversations. For me and for Coach Kiffin, let's play this game on the 27th and we'll go into those details later. We just want to finish what we started with this football team, with the team of 2025. Give them our undivided attention before transition happens. So until then, nothing will necessarily happen in that regard. There'll be opportunity there. Where that lies, I'm not sure. But the priority is our current football team," Wilson said on Tuesday.
I think Jaques tried to summarize it in a tweet and the drama queens on here went off and took their pitchforks out.
re: Frank Wilson says he’s received no clarity on his future with LSU
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/9/25 at 11:12 am to Wichita Co Tiger
quote:
The fact that Frank would say that publicly speaks volumes about the stuff he’s been doing doing (allegedly)
Jesus. If you were in his situation and didnt yet know if you were being retained how would you answer the question when asked by a reporter?
Its an honest answer. fricked up to view it as an indictment on his character.
re: Coach O on Bussin' With The Boys Podcast
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/9/25 at 11:07 am to DallasTiger
quote:
A real, legitimate and qualified coach simply hires an agent who puts out feelers into the college and pro coaching communities. Interest is created, followed by interviews, and then offers as the season plays out and coaching openings surface.
Not all real legitimate and qualified coaches are a personality that the media and podcast communities like to talk to. This isnt an either or. He can have his agents doing exactly what you said, interviewing with teams and also be sitting down to have a podcast interview in the time between.
In the last month he's been rumored to have been in consideration for the Oreg St, Ark, and Tulane hc positions, as well as the LSU DL and now FL DL positions. Oh no! He did a podcast! Heaven forbid!
re: SEC-C Yuge miss not alternating sites
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/6/25 at 8:04 pm to SanJoseTigerFan
quote:
Orlando
Maybe include Houston
Gross. Houston better than Orlando. Orlando is a terrible stadium and city. Houston is meh all around.
re: Reflecting on the asinine Kiffin discussion on gameday
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/6/25 at 4:53 pm to jmaclsu
Oh the hypocrites sitting there on the biggest show on the biggest sports network. Why did Rece leave the network he was on in Michigan? I believe it was Pat who said he wished Lane would have stayed and built what he wanted at Ole Miss. Says the guy that jumped from DAZN to ESPN. Why did Desmond choose to play at Michigan rather than a smaller school?
Also, when people bring up how they agree he couldnt coach the playoffs and poach coaches and players, why doesnt anyone point out theres absolutely nothing stopping him from doing that while hes not coaching the playoffs?? Blows my mind no one counters that point.
Also, when people bring up how they agree he couldnt coach the playoffs and poach coaches and players, why doesnt anyone point out theres absolutely nothing stopping him from doing that while hes not coaching the playoffs?? Blows my mind no one counters that point.
re: Can we move on from the Will Wade romance?
Posted by Beef Supreme on 12/3/25 at 11:31 pm to Pax Regis
quote:
And LSU actually finally looks ok
We started 11-1 out of conference in 2022, won our opening SEC game to start 12-1 and then finished 14-19
We started 11-2 ooc last year and finished 14-18.
Pump the brakes.
re: LSU isn't a blue blood, and yet...
Posted by Beef Supreme on 11/30/25 at 11:58 pm to VYForever
quote:
LSU isn't a blue blood
You're right. Not a blue blood. But we're maybe the biggest brand in college sports at the moment. We're the school that churns out the most celebrity and most influence than any other school. Name another school with as many household names. Burrow, Daniels, Chase, Jefferson, Skenes, Bregman, Dunne, Reese.
Turn on the largest sports network in the world and our alumni are all over it repping us. Watch kids score a TD and they're doing the griddy.
We win championships across multiple sports.
We also are the only school in history that a coach ever left ND for. And he was their winningest coach of all time. It didnt work out, and you can chalk it up to whatever reason you would like but that statement is a fact. And now we just went to a rival and pulled their HC and offensive staff the day after they completed the greatest season in their school history and are preparing for the playoffs.
Popular
0












