Started By
Message

Only changed your protein intake?

Posted on 1/4/23 at 3:16 pm
Posted by Neauxla
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2008
34495 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 3:16 pm
I have heard countless times that you need .7-1g of protein per pound of muscle per day but I've never done it. That's a lot of damn protein.

Has anyone been into fitness for a while and ONLY changed their protein intake and seen results? I'm trying to decide if I should give it a go. Just seems like a lot of work to take that much protein per day.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
37963 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Has anyone been into fitness for a while and ONLY changed their protein intake and seen results? I'm trying to decide if I should give it a go. Just seems like a lot of work to take that much protein per day.




then you arent eating enough

and to answer your questions, best gains i have ever gotten in my life was when i was doing dc training and upped my protein to 2x per lbs (400g daily)
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11366 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 3:51 pm to
Everyone on carnivore and even most keto diets are going to easily hit 1+ per pound per day. That why they are effective. Satiating and you hit most macros with little supplementation if done correctly.

Personally I struggle with it. I love meat, but my stomach gets jacked up when I start going too heavy and I don't like shakes. There are variations of lower protein diets for people to get lean and stay muscular. But if you want to put on serious muscle, you'll have to go high protein (.66-.75 per pound). You still aren't gaining quickly without a bump from something else..
Posted by bayouvette
Raceland
Member since Oct 2005
5891 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 4:43 pm to
Yes. Absolutely..

The moment I got my protein to 220grams a day, everyday in my 20s with natural test flowing I blew up and put about 30lbs of muscle in about 5 years.

Protein IS the key to getting big. Got to have it.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44382 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Personally I struggle with it. I love meat, but my stomach gets jacked up when I start going too heavy



Same. I struggle to hit my protein target consistently.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86096 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 7:10 pm to
I just started tracking my macros for the first time ever and realized I wasn’t eating near the amount of protein I thought I was.

MacroFactor wants me to eat 220 gr and I’ve struggled to get 150 this week with eating lots of meat and eggs like I always do.

Just ordered some protein powder to supplement.

We will see what type of gains I make this spring.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39823 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

Protein IS the key to getting big. Got to have it.
Protein is the key to everything. One of my favorite health guys on podcasts and Instagram said this the other day:

When people try to lose weight by cutting calories, they end up eating less protein.

The real solution is to eat more protein.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
37963 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:24 pm to
Yep, protein literally can not be stored as body fat. Key to everything involved with health

The benefits of red meat for mental health, clarity and performance is way under rated too. If you aren’t eating red meat than you 100% need to be taking creatine(should be anyways)
This post was edited on 1/4/23 at 9:27 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39823 posts
Posted on 1/4/23 at 9:53 pm to
quote:


The benefits of red meat for mental health, clarity and performance is way under rated too.
It's crazy to me the demonization of this super food.

The same guy I quoted earlier said this in answer to his own question that he posed - How were people so effortlessly thin in the 50s 60s and 70s?


They didn't do crazy diets

They didn't have calorie counting apps

They didn't have to fast

They didn't have gym memberships...and they even ate dessert


...

They ate food cooked from scratch

They ate animal protein

They ate full fat

They ate out only as a treat

They didn't eat foods with long ingredient lists...so they were properly satiated by their foods so they naturally ate the right amount in the long term.

All that changed in 1980...what happened?

The US dietary guidelines were introduced

The food industry created a multitude of low fat products

Huge increase in seed oil, refined grains and added sugar, displacing real foods

Increase of additives and pesticides

Societal norms changed to eating out

People now eat for pleasure, because they're sad, or boredom

These foods are constantly marketed to them and are cheap and convenient

They're never full because the protein and nutrients have been removed from the food supply

There's almost no choice but to overeat
Posted by lattin1
baton rouge
Member since May 2014
328 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 3:16 am to
quote:

Yep, protein literally can not be stored as body fat.


This isn't true at all. Once the protein needs of your body are met, any extra is used for energy or stored as fat. Excess calories from any source, including protein, will be stored as fat in the body.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59117 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 7:42 am to
Idk bruh have you eaten food back then


I remember food back in the 90s and it wasn’t as good as it is now

I think it’s the seasonings these days that make us fat
Posted by bamaguy17
Member since Jul 2022
1282 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 8:19 am to
In the 90s, we ate at home more, but when we did go out to eat, are you telling me that Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, McDonald’s, etc. are not better than they are now? You know that’s a lie.
Posted by bayouvette
Raceland
Member since Oct 2005
5891 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 8:38 am to
Companies hoping on the new fitness craze released "low fat" alternatives. But they just replaced fat with sugar.
Sugar is the reason fatties are fatties today.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
37963 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:


This isn't true at all. Once the protein needs of your body are met, any extra is used for energy or stored as fat. Excess calories from any source, including protein, will be stored as fat in the body.


protein isnt, might want to go read the new studies out that show about 90%+ protein literally can not be stored as body fat even when in a caloric surplus. Dr Campbell, Menno and a couple others have talked about this in some of the research review publications lately.

go read the study by Dr Jose Antonio (PMID=24834017) where they put a group on 2g per lbs(4.4g/kg) vs 0.8g per(1.8g/kg) and had the high protein group eat the extra 800 calories as excess on top of the surplus they were already in

after 8 weeks the high protein group gained 4lbs of muscle and lost 1/2lbs of bodyfat

the moderate protein group gained 3 lbs of muscle and gained 1/2lbs of fat

why did this happen? researchers arent sure and beleive it had to do with the thermic effect of food.

it is worth noting, half the high protein group quit due to GI stress so there are some drawbacks

because the study was only 8 weeks the researchers determined that there was not a significant different in muscle mass gains, even though it was 25% more for the high protein group. over only 8 weeks that isnt much but over the course of a year...yea it becomes a much bigger deal.

i am certain its not a linear relationship though but i would imagine if studied(based on my own personal studies and those following the OG DC training diet) a year of someone eating like this...you would see a pretty big overall difference.


Dr Campbell also ran a study where he took already trained females(had to meat a min of 1.5x deadlift and had to demostrate it in the USF performance and physique lab) (where Dr Campbell, Dr Stevenson and others work and also where layne sometimes does work) and he had half increase their protein intake from 1.5g/kg to 2.5g/kg and over 8 weeks they had a net muscle mass increase of 4.5lbs. check pmid=29405780



there is also the study by Dr Bray (pmid=22215165) where he had people live in the metabolic unit(literally live in the lab) for 12 weeks. He split into 2 groups (low protein-0.7g/kg per day and high protein-3g/kg per day) and fed them at a 1000 calorie surplus. they did not train at all.

subjects were not obese and were normal/overweight non exercising subjects. after 12 weeks the low pro group gained 7 lbs, all fat. the high protien group gained 14 lbs, 7 lbs of that was lean body tissue though.

showing even without training that you can gain muscle just from eating more protien


here are a couple quotes about a 2012 study done by dr bray, again subject lived in the lab (JAMA 2012, 307:47-55)



quote:

The effects of over-consuming ( ~ 1,000 kcal day) diets composed of low (5 %), normal (15 %), or high (25 %) amounts of energy from protein are shown. Over-consuming diets composted of 15-25 % energy from protein resulted in significant lean mass accretion compared to over-consuming a diet composed of 5 % energy from protein. Note there are no differences between groups in fat mass gain over the overfeeding intervention; the additional weight gain (body mass) in the 15-25 % groups is accounted for by lean body mass accretion.


quote:

“Calories alone […] contributed to the increase in body fat. In contrast, protein contributed to changes in […] lean body mass, but not to the increase in body fat.”


so...the additional 3 kg of body weight gained in the normal and high protein groups was shown to be due to an increase in lean body mass and not body fat.


in conclusion....overall...can you put on fat from excess protein....yes but its really really hard, especially if training. especialyl when you consider thermic effect of food which is the following percentage per macro on average

prot-25%
fat-2%
carbs-8%




This post was edited on 1/5/23 at 9:32 am
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22542 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 9:17 am to
Well that's cool. Here come the farts. Wife gonna love me more.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59117 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 9:33 am to
Idk Taco Bell in the 90s was like straight food poisoning so we never went

Btw fellas I have the flu so I’m coughing and I’m also too nauseated to eat anything so I’ve decided to live off gurt shakes til I get 6 pack basically gurt casein protein and skim milk
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
37963 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Well that's cool. Here come the farts. Wife gonna love me more.


if you are gonna do it...ill say, easist thing i found outside of whey sahkes was simply to eat ground beef. brown it, rinse it under hot hot water and then throw it back in the pan to almost flash fry it and season then.

normally i am a big season the raw meat kind of guy but if you are rinsing to remove as much fat as possible it tends to just rinse off anyways.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22542 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 9:40 am to
Nope, that sounds gross
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22542 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 9:40 am to
quote:

but when we did go out to eat, are you telling me that Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, McDonald’s, etc. are not better than they are now? You know that’s a lie.


90s Taco Bell didn't have 5 layer burrito so yeah, current is better
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39823 posts
Posted on 1/5/23 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Idk bruh have you eaten food back then
Back when? The 50s, 60s and 70s? The big changes started happening in 1980. Also, the massive ramp up in seed oils started in the late 80s when the guy in Nebraska shamed McDonalds into using soybean oil and other crap instead of tallow. The entire industry has followed suit, such that our consumption of this toxic garbage is sky high now. Soybean oil alone is like 8% of ingested American calories.

quote:


I remember food back in the 90s and it wasn’t as good as it is now
I kind of know what you mean in that "foodie" type of stuff is more prevalent now. But most of that is slathered in nasty oils and other ingredients also.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram