- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Will adding Texas and OU help or hurt LSU?
Posted on 7/24/21 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 7/24/21 at 6:24 pm
I’ve heard arguments for and against, so wanted to ask the question directly and get tRant on the record as to how they think this proposed SEC expansion will impact LSU. What say you?
This post was edited on 7/24/21 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 7/24/21 at 6:26 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Money: helps
Conference power: helps
Avoiding Bama: helps
Our best annual games traditionally will go away: HURTS
Conference power: helps
Avoiding Bama: helps
Our best annual games traditionally will go away: HURTS
Posted on 7/24/21 at 6:39 pm to Draconian Sanctions
It will hurt in the sense that it will make Texas a much more formidable force in recruiting. It will impair our ability to scoop up some of the best players from Texas.
The positive side - $$$$$
The positive side - $$$$$
Posted on 7/24/21 at 6:43 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I'm on the fence. Adding Texas and OU is great exposure, money and recruiting.
However, with them in conference, it just adds to the toughness of getting thru it to the championship.
The teams in SEC beat up on each other and then you will have good teams from weaker conferences sneaking into the top spots in the polls.
Easier for Ohio State and Clemson to garner top spot. They won't have to go thru a gauntlet of Bama, Texas, OU, Florida, Georgia, or Auburn
LA base USC and UCLA will be in there to. Because the media market wants it.
LSU could be be light years ahead of Ohio State in strength , but 2 losses to say Bama and Texas and they are on outside looking in.
Doesn't seem right until they fix the selection process and polls
However, with them in conference, it just adds to the toughness of getting thru it to the championship.
The teams in SEC beat up on each other and then you will have good teams from weaker conferences sneaking into the top spots in the polls.
Easier for Ohio State and Clemson to garner top spot. They won't have to go thru a gauntlet of Bama, Texas, OU, Florida, Georgia, or Auburn
LA base USC and UCLA will be in there to. Because the media market wants it.
LSU could be be light years ahead of Ohio State in strength , but 2 losses to say Bama and Texas and they are on outside looking in.
Doesn't seem right until they fix the selection process and polls
Posted on 7/24/21 at 6:49 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I feel like it helps ou and Texas more than it helps us
Posted on 7/24/21 at 7:36 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Won’t help our recruiting situation in Texas. That’s for sure.
Posted on 7/24/21 at 7:52 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Who knows if it helps or hurts recruiting, path to playoffs , rivalries, etc. That stuff is all secondary to being part of THE MEGACONFERENCE. Think about all the other conferences. Everyone in the Big 10 not named Ohio State, Michigan, or Penn State will wish to God they could be friggin’ Vanderbilt, for God’s sake. The SEC will control college football for the foreseeable future, and LSU doesn’t have to worry about being left behind - unlike every team in the Big 12, PAC 12, ACC, etc. That means everything.
Posted on 7/24/21 at 7:54 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Bout 3.5% helps
Posted on 7/24/21 at 8:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
All in all it probably helps. With no undefeated Oklahoma rolling into the playoffs for their annual beat down there's a spot open for a second SEC team. It's a very slight negative to recruiting but Orgeron will never have any problem pulling in elite talent to LSU.
And all those old rivalries aren't going away, they'll just be biennial going forward. That's not my preference but I can live with it.
I'd still vote no if I had a vote. Mostly because of how humiliating it would be for Texas.
And all those old rivalries aren't going away, they'll just be biennial going forward. That's not my preference but I can live with it.
I'd still vote no if I had a vote. Mostly because of how humiliating it would be for Texas.
Posted on 7/24/21 at 8:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I think it's fantastic from a monetary standpoint for the university & the conference. I also love it from a fan standpoint with quality opponents joining the league.
LSU would definitely benefit if a 12 team playoff comes to fruition.
LSU would definitely benefit if a 12 team playoff comes to fruition.
Posted on 7/24/21 at 8:13 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I think it will hurt in recruiting with another big time program in the state next door that will try and get their hands on LA recruits. It makes it to where LSU can’t have a couple down years in a row or else they could really fall behind. The only teams it helps is UT and OU, especially UT as they were on their way to irrelevancy
Posted on 7/24/21 at 8:14 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I don’t really see how it’ll impact recruiting much. We’ll still land most of the top in state kids with bama the biggest threat. If anything that kid who gets overlooked or doesn’t get a commitable offer ends up with one of them versus say Miss state or Arkansas
We’ll still always be in the mix for Texas kids in our sweet spots. Maybe this’ll shore up things for them a little
We’ll still always be in the mix for Texas kids in our sweet spots. Maybe this’ll shore up things for them a little
This post was edited on 7/24/21 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 7/24/21 at 9:20 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Think it is upside, but I really do not expect it to end with two. More to come, so I will wait till the dust settles.
Posted on 7/24/21 at 9:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Everyone assumes this means more money - but how much are we actually looking at? Not worth saving Texas's sorry arse for 2 or 3 million per year.
Posted on 7/24/21 at 9:32 pm to Draconian Sanctions
OU and UT will buy victories.
Posted on 7/24/21 at 9:41 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Hurt, so the SEC will do it.
Posted on 7/25/21 at 1:04 am to Draconian Sanctions
Texas has ruined every conference they’ve ever been in so no it doesn’t help us or anyone else in the SEC. Texas is a cancer
Posted on 7/25/21 at 1:42 am to Draconian Sanctions
Money: helps
Excitement: hurts
Strength of schedule: hurts
National relevance now that we won’t be the team every one expects to give Bama their toughest test: big hurt
Recruiting: hurts really bad
Losing biggest and best games every year: astronomical hurt
I see no upside to this move as it is EXCEPT for the program to make a lot of money which is obviously their man concern.
As a product, it ONLY has upside if SEC is leaving the NCAA.
Not playing Bama every year is bad for LSU. You’re either a pussy, a dumbass, or a combination of both if you think otherwise. You don’t “happily” take the #1 team off your schedule. Arguably the biggest game in the nation every year. It gives us publicity. National recognition. A competitive goal to achieve. Think of all the fringe schools that would kill to get a home and home with Bama for national attention. And here a bunch of you idiots want to get rid of that game so we can be in a pod with Ole Miss. give me a break.
To the idiots that are thinking that way. You’re dead wrong. It makes LSU no better than UCF by dodging big games. And we’ll be a lot like UCF (left out) come playoff time if this really is the decision
Excitement: hurts
Strength of schedule: hurts
National relevance now that we won’t be the team every one expects to give Bama their toughest test: big hurt
Recruiting: hurts really bad
Losing biggest and best games every year: astronomical hurt
I see no upside to this move as it is EXCEPT for the program to make a lot of money which is obviously their man concern.
As a product, it ONLY has upside if SEC is leaving the NCAA.
Not playing Bama every year is bad for LSU. You’re either a pussy, a dumbass, or a combination of both if you think otherwise. You don’t “happily” take the #1 team off your schedule. Arguably the biggest game in the nation every year. It gives us publicity. National recognition. A competitive goal to achieve. Think of all the fringe schools that would kill to get a home and home with Bama for national attention. And here a bunch of you idiots want to get rid of that game so we can be in a pod with Ole Miss. give me a break.
To the idiots that are thinking that way. You’re dead wrong. It makes LSU no better than UCF by dodging big games. And we’ll be a lot like UCF (left out) come playoff time if this really is the decision
Posted on 7/25/21 at 2:17 am to Draconian Sanctions
We are diluting the SEC IMHO
Posted on 7/25/21 at 5:23 am to Draconian Sanctions
The biggest negative is that the SEC is losing its identity. LSU is going to be LSU no matter who is in the Conference but with so many new teams in the last 10 years the SEC is really not a Conference as we have known Conferences in the past. I really think that 14 was the absolute Maximum to retain the SEC Identity but with 16 teams it is really unmanageable.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News