Ryan Clark is seriously a shite bag

Hope he gets tied up in litigation for years.

So I’m guessing they want this child to be cast aside and never be able to redeem herself? Her whole life is now canceled over a word? Meanwhile every rap song has the n word for dayzzzzzzz.

That's a shitty thing for her to post. Let's he honest though, he basically posts the same kind of shite and says the same kind of shite on TV the other way around pretty much daily.

A grown man calling out a child. Such a piece of shite.

This is what Ryan Clark does.

He lives to tear down his own house.

He did it in Pitt. He’s done it at LSU.

He’s doing it to his own daughter’s school.

He will tear down ASU at some point. Guaranteed.

If that girl did that, it’s horrible. There is no excuse. But tearing down the school and harming EVERYONE there serves no purpose. He’s a piece of shite.

The master race baiter, Ryan Clark strikes again. Hopefully LSU forever bans this a-hole from campus.

That's Ryan Clark in a nutshell. Look at me! Reward me for "standing up to injustice".

What this girl did is absolutely stupid, but it's inconsequential. A grown man going into a twitter frenzy is absolutely ridiculous.

Could easily be a doctored picture

My group chat had this discussion a few months ago during cancel culture 101 (friends, political viewpoints on both sides). I personally don't like dealing with politics, so I stayed out of it but this was what was interesting.

Side A said, in regards to kids being expelled, life ruined, etc over social media posts like this that it was justified and people like that deserve it, etc. That the public should know their shame and make the judgement to 'cancel' them for being dispicable human beings.

Side B argued, well I think canceling a teenager for such things is stupid. They are children, it ruins their life. they deserve punishment but to ruin any potential chance of a job, career, education, etc over something like that is ridiculous.

Side A argues: serves them right.


Now onto the other topic: prison and offenders

Side A argues that prisoners (murders, dealers, rapists, burglaries, etc) all deserve a chance of reform. They don't deserve to have their entire LIVES ruined and stay incarcerated with no chance of improving their chance once they get out (getting a good job with a felony, etc)

Side B retorts, they committed the crimes and they deserve what came to them. they knew their actions, they knew the consequences. Someone's livelihood was take, family member/friend was killed, etc.

Side A argues: it doesn't mean they can't improve.

I just thought it was interesting that both sides sound the same, just depends on what they want to be the champion for.

Imagine being so weak minded to let a single word ruin your existence.

As juvenile and stupid as the Snapchat was, the overreactions and so deeply tweeted
sympathies show almost equaled adult immaturity.