Started By
Message
locked post

Why isn’t Fox Talking About Giuliani Claim About Underage Girl

Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:22 am
Posted by Catchfalaya
Member since Feb 2018
1923 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:22 am
I don’t understand. Giuliani said last night on news max interview the laptop contained underage girls on it. How is this not being discussed at the moment? Credible or not credible
Posted by G The Tiger Fan
Member since Apr 2015
103966 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:23 am to
Because FOX is run by leftists who want Biden to win.
Posted by Boss13
Mobile
Member since Oct 2016
1169 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:25 am to
You can say it's because they are leftist, but they want to independently verify before they make a claim like underaged girls.Even Hannity and Tucker will want more confirmation than a tweet before running with a story where the claims are so significant that you could lose all credibility if it's not true.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Why isn’t Fox Talking About Giuliani Claim About Underage Girl


Not watching. Won't be watching.



But....I'm sure Suzanne and Paul have instructed them not to talk about it if they want those lucrative paychecks to keep flowing their way.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:26 am to
That is a pretty hot button item to be as cavalier as to say
quote:

Credible or not credible
about.


They have discussed, at length, those things that have been RELEASED (emails, etc). The underage is just alleged at the moment and those pics are not released (good). So, it would really be pretty irresponsible to do more than report "been turned over to police for possible..."

I think that is a wise move
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22506 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:26 am to
Worried about their image?
Some of their own implicated?
Afraid to show images?
Loss of woke sponsorships?
Fear of lawsuits?
Just not all-in?

Whatcha got?
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:27 am to
After all those years of Shepard "Sucking Dan Rather's C*ck" Smith, you'd think that people would understand that there is a HUGE difference between Fox News between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. (cst) and Fox News between 2:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. (cst)

They are completely f*cking different.
This post was edited on 10/21/20 at 8:28 am
Posted by PickupAutist
Member since Sep 2018
3022 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:28 am to
Fox is the media, and like the rest of the media, they can’t stand it when trump calls them out. They hate him as much as msnbc does.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8356 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:29 am to
The uncomfortable and outright ickiness of the act make it the kind of thing that no one wants to talk about. Sam Harris had a podcast with a reporter who tried to shine a light on pedophilia in this country, and one of the things they talked a lot about is the difficulty in communicating about the existence of such an evil act. People genuinely didn’t want to hear it; they’d rather just falsely assume it doesn’t exist than being forced to confront that it does. It’s that revolting.

I suspect some of that is going on here as well. The big news outlets might not want to make it an official story until they absolutely have to, which would only happen after a law enforcement agency directly confirmed to the media outlet that said photos/videos exist. This is one of the exceedingly few areas where the MSM doesn’t seem to be okay with using second hand sources
This post was edited on 10/21/20 at 8:31 am
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23828 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:31 am to
Your boy Nick Sandman got paid for slander for less.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64376 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:34 am to
I’m quite ok with checking and double checking before you start banging the pedo drum.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68425 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:36 am to
He didn't say the pics of the underage girl was inappropriate that I heard. They are going to avoid it if possible.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9241 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:37 am to
Because they need the actual photos.

They don’t want a libel claim without the photos
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17620 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:42 am to
Rudy tweeted it so that the authorities know they can't sweep it under the rug. The plan may be to wait on the authorities, I don't know that bringing this to light without the authorities arresting Hunter is a winning strategy unless there's some kind of proof they can put out in the media.
Posted by Andynola
Member since Aug 2014
738 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:43 am to
quote:

John Paul Mac Isaac, said he has a condition that affects his vision and “can’t be 100% sure” it was Hunter Biden who dropped off the computer for repair.


LINK

Maybe cause this whole thing stinks? Now he is not sure it was Hunter. All the so called “evidence” is coming from Rudy not the FBI.

Roger Ailes is not in charge anymore. No more raping and lying for trump this election. Fox has higher standards than the 8th grade girls lunch table that Tigerdroppings has become. .
This post was edited on 10/21/20 at 8:44 am
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
7586 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:45 am to
quote:

I don’t understand.

Pedo-crime is radioactive. Everybody that gets close to it gets burned to some degree, some are irreparably damaged.
That's why the first instinct is to bury it.
To the naive, the best analogy for exposure to raw pedo-crime would be standing under the Trinity test-stand at T+.025 seconds.
This post was edited on 10/21/20 at 8:46 am
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 8:49 am to
Because you'd have to be a complete moron to report something from Giuliani without verifying it
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54231 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 10:23 am to
Fox likes to verify rumors before reporting news items so they can present it as "unverified". i.e., "we have verified that this supposed breaking news item is unverifiable.
Posted by TigerCoon
Member since Nov 2005
18895 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 10:44 am to
Not a fan of recent FOX reporting, but to their credit, at least they've carried SOME stories. I don't think the words "Hunter Biden" have appeared on CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, or CBS in the past week.

It's pretty disgusting.
This post was edited on 10/21/20 at 10:46 am
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
20495 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 10:46 am to
Honestly this is something they don't want to jump the gun on at all. I can see why it isn't being talked about at FOX quite yet. This is one thing they absolutely cannot get wrong. It's coming though... believe that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram